Jump to content

GH: How would you phase out Sonny?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I know for some, myself included, Sonny and the mob stuff is this black hole that makes it desperately hard to enjoy most aspects of this show. I honestly feel like if MB even just took one of those extended vacations that TG is constantly taking things would improve drastically. If given the chance how would you phase Sonny out temporarily or permanently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

1. Brenda & Sonny reunite. And realize that Paris is much prettier than Port Charles.

2. Irreversible death. Added bonus: Lorenzo and AJ do the honors.

ETA: Sonny and Jason have been seriously over-exposed (add Carly to that list, too) but IMO it is the whole Mob concept that is killing the show. That and GH's unwillingness to utilize and rotate a talented ensemble cast. IMO, Rick Hearst is arguably the most talented actor on the show and by rights should be on an equal footing with MB. Similarly, Greg Vaughan as legacy character Lucky Spencer should be given the same kind of props and material that Steve Burton gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, Sonny is only half the problem. You would then need to phase out Jason and the Zaccharas. If MB would of left when his contract expired or where to take a vacation I don't think things would drastically improve since you still had plently of characters tied to the mob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lucy, Kevin, the ghost of Alan, Monica, Mac, Brenda, Luke, Tracey, Robert, Anna, Robyn, Sean, Tiffany, the ghost of Tony, the ghost of Katherine and last, but by no means least, Bobbie all pronounce him dead at, you guessed it, General Hospital.

Then, Jason and the other mob people also get to die very visible and irreversible deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Seeing as how GH has access to the actors who played Robert, Anna, Luke, Laura, Sean, Tiffany, Bobbie, Mac and Felicia, the easiest way to fix GH would be to just start an episode with Felicia waking up telling Mac "what a horrible dream..."

Then she goes to Kellys and has lunch with all of the above and it is discovered that everything from 1991 on never happened, and we spend the week updating and explaining what all of the characters have been doing for the last 18 years. Not only would this get rid of the mob, but it would mean Alan and AJ are alive. GH then would have the luxury of reintroducing all the characters it wants to (like Helena, Nik and the Cassadines, or Liz). Jason would revert back to being a Q and so on. Clean slate achieved, proceed as the writers see fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LoL, my thoughts exactly. Now I don't condone violence, but since GH seems to live for it, why not? Why should I suffer Sonny being phased out, when he's been a annoying piece of sh-t since, well, fukc its been a long time. One bullet to the head. DONE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Six minutes into watching today's episode, and there's Joey...... Ugh!!
    • We have to deal with more Tide and Febreeze - that’s really what’s paying the bills for the show, so it’s a necessary evil. 
    • It is interesting that Ann lasts as long as she does as a character on the show. I assume the show chose not to renew her contract, but I don't know for certain. I also believe Millette Alexander's contract wasn't renewed after she last appeared at Christmas in 1982. Looking back, I really wish that they had ended up pairing Sara and Mike Bauer versus Sara and Adam. Sara and Mike were already good friends, and it would have been an interesting twist in 1978 if Sara and Mike had a fling after Dean Blackwell's death, Sara turning to Mike for comfort after Dean's death. Mike and Sara certainly could have been a tentpole couple moving forward, unlike Mike and Elizabeth.
    • I wish they’d inject some of Colby’s real life energy, and yes, fashion sense, into Kat. 
    • Like I've said before, I think the show is often a very strange (and admittedly fascinating to me) mix of very old-fashioned, purple dialogue and classic soap opera structural elements - right down to the insanely blatant, virally successful product placement for P&G - mixed with other dialogue or material that tries desperately to be current and hip. One moment it will remind me of very hokey old B&B stuff or expository stuff out of the '60s, and the other it'll look and sound like the Prospect Park soaps. Some of the hipper dialogue or material (Chelsea's sexuality, etc.) works for me, others are pure cringe. Same with the classical stuff, like the characters (particularly the elders) gathering around to recap plot, make grand pronouncements about each other or their children/family, or make grave portents of the future. Then there's the whole piano thing lol. It's a weird mix, but not one I'm mad about atm so much as mystified by. As a longtime soap fan it is very compelling to examine even when parts of it really don't work, because so much of BTG feels both very old and very new at the same time. I do think they need to dump the Bell (or maybe more accurately Brad Bell) school of dialogue MVJ has been working from for years, and bring in more of the naturalistic GH house style she and Guza worked from in the '90s and 2000s. If that means dumping a lot of the dialogue people so be it (I do think some are good). OTOH the Bell style seems to work for a lot of the social media and probably offline audience that isn't me, so who's to say. I don't think Dani is at all in the latter-day Carly though. She's not on quite as much, and she's far from always right. I do think they are definitely playing it down the middle with the Duprees while waiting to reveal more, but I do think they want you to see them both ways or divide the audience on who they are. Which seems to have succeeded because some people are baffled.
    • Might this show be a black stereotype? Angry crazy acting women like Dani and Leslie. Cheating punk men like Bill and Ted who didn't keep it in their pants. Angry black men like Martin. Promiscuous black man wanting the white girl. Dirty black cops. And so on?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • That would require Dani to think about someone/something other than herself.. and we all know Dani only thinks about Dani.  Including her butting into Nicole's business instead of just being a supportive sister.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy