Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Carl, you're spiralling. Maybe it's time to tap out for a little while.

This op to oust Biden has failed. The backlash has just begun and it's fierce. Meanwhile Gaza isn't an issue anymore because most of that was astroturfed too. Meanwhile the GOP has no money, no ground game, and Donald Trump hasn't had a public event in 10 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6818

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Christopher Bouzy, founder of Spoutible published a pretty detailed thread chain listing all of the anti-Biden Op-Ed pieces, some going back nearly a decade. This isn’t new. There is also an existing effort to try to force out VP Harris, because they likely know that Biden, like any president has a Vice President for a reason (there was also an Op-Ed that called for Biden to step down as VP, with some pretty bizarre suggestions for alternatives). If folks really want to focus on stability of the executive branch, they would realize that Biden has a solid VP in case anything should arise, like any president. 
 

Meanwhile, there is little to no ink being spilled on the very real, very destructive Project 2025 and Trump is getting away with his very weak unconvincing protestations of any links between him and Project 2025. Democrats need to direct the same and more energy to putting Project 2025 under a microscope, the way that some put Gingrich’s Contract On America but this time with a greater sense of urgency.

Project 2025. Make it an inescapably urgent issue that voters will actually focus on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Vee That AOC video helps drive home Biden's strategy of talking about "elites" vs the everyday person who wants him in. Of course, some on the left would say AOC is an elite, but she still probably sees the common person more than Rob Reiner, or Michael Moore, or other celebrities who are calling for him to drop out.

If they had wanted him to drop out, they should have pushed this a year ago. Polling isn't good for him now, but it wasn't great then either. Now they are just mostly generating a constant negative feedback cycle that will go nowhere, aside from when they can say we told you so in November.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because I have pretty much blocked out much of that debate, I don’t know whether this was discussed at all during that debate but the Biden administration shout be touting this as much as possible and really lay down the facts and challenge his opponent to own up to how much he weakened the US in terms of technological advancement and security and how his predecessor/opponent’s constant picking fights with China did nothing to shore up U.S.’ place in supply chain security, quite the opposite—and the Biden administration’s approach has been far more successful.

(yes, it’s the NYT, but we know that altruism about broken clocks…)

U.S. Creates High-Tech Global Supply Chains to Blunt Risks Tied to China

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I heard on the radio this morning the RNC convention is next week. It was the first mention I've heard of it. Part of me thinks that part of this anti-Biden feeding frenzy has been about reducing expectations for Trump next week. It was a pre-emptive strike.

I want protesters to show up dressed in shark costumes and pictures of Hannibal Lechter with "Trump thinks I'm real" scrawled across them.

The RNC is going to be a circus so the media decided to try and force a brokered DNC convention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I absolutely think that this is at play. Whether mainstream news outlets are knowingly playing along or asleep at the wheel, I am not certain.

The Hunter Biden mess peeled away so they are taking this up with gusto, hoping no one remembers the felonious merchandise they’re trying to sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me too. I believe he did it and I'm pretty sure it's not my bias talking. The testimony in the court transcripts sounded truthful to me. There was a lot of detail. Plus we know he has a thing for young girls and that he went to that hellhole of an island more than once. He's really a disgusting bastard who lacks a soul, but he was right when said he can do anything and his followers don't care.

Sadly, I believe Bill Gates is guilty as well. I wonder how people justify this type of predatory behavior to themselves? Those girls were practically babies.

I didn't even know about Project 2025 until recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sadly, that jackass tied to Trump and Project 2025 who went around boasting about how they were winning a "bloodless revolution" did more to promote their plan than the media ever would, aside from a few MSNBC anchors. Much of the media, along with the dead end left, see it as a scare tactic, something that will never happen. To them it's the new Roe v Wade overturning, something else they spent years saying would never happen and if you said it was in danger you were fearmongering. And some are already doing what they did post-Dobbs - claiming the Democrats are complicit. There's always a way to make sure the public is ill-informed. 

I have seen some people trying to point out just how much veterans will be targeted in these plans. Given how many vets vote against their own interest, I'm not sure learning of these plans would make any difference, but I hope it gets out there. 

There are never any expectations for Trump, but I do think the media is at a point where polls are going their way and the Democrats are badly divided, so they figure why rock the boat. Showing as little of Trump as possible helps get their man back in office. More importantly, it means less attention is paid to the deeply cynical and false choices he's made for the RNC platform, lying about "softening" on abortion and gay marriage. Less people knowing about it means the true believers won't be upset with him and the people who might fall for these lies won't know just how repulsive and repulsed the people who actually run the party are.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy