Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

 

I remember he got a lot of hype at the time he was first elected as he beat a fat cat Democrat. That's about it. 

 

A long article about Democrats' chances in this year's midterms. 

 

(I'd say they're not anywhere near as good as some think, which this article seems to agree with)

 

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/02/23/2018-election-analysis-politics-217073

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So the Supreme Court refuses to hear the DACA appeal. So for the time being DACA is still in effect and the 9th circuit is likely to rule in favor of DACA.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-26/u-s-supreme-court-rebuffs-trump-won-t-hear-immigration-appeal-je4bn951?cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

 

 

No one knows what's going to happen, but I am done listening to any Beltway press or media when it comes to politics. Politico did a horrible take the day before on one of our local congressional races here in Illinois - Lipinski vs. Newman, basically insisting democrats need to stay with Blue Dog Lipinski. 

 

Now if this were a red or purple district I would agree, but this is a district that is solid blue so going with the more progressive Newman (who is not radical left) is not a mistake as this district has ZERO chance of ever going red.  Lipinski is pro life, anti immigrant, voted against the Affordable Care Act.  Has not touched on how important to healthcare is to his district. It's also a district that has seen a shift in terms of latino population over the past 8 years, doubling.  He does have the state party support, the support of mayors across his district, and has brought money into his district due to his position on the transportation committee. And he does show up to events in his district regularly when he's in town. So it's not all negative. But these are the same people who believed Virginia was going with Gillespie, didn't predict the races across the state correctly, insisted Roy Moore was going to win.  I'm not diminishing the fact that the races won't be easy, but neither are people who actually live in these districts. I actually don't think by the way Newman will win. Lipinski has the financial advantage and AFLCIO support. But I think it will be closer than expected.

 

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

+1 

One of the reasons why I posed my question specifically toward boardmates who live in Florida is because I wanted to get away from the pundit press articles.

Many of these press pundits staunchly state one thing, only to reverse their stance or pretend they never stated what was previously said anyway.  They've all been practicing this special form of plausible deniability since the horrendous outcome of the 2016 election.

I'm done with them being the first source of what's supposedly going on in the "grassroots".

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Alamo, Avis, Budget, Enterprise AND Hertz?  Well, [!@#$%^&*].  How are they gonna transport their guns across state lines NOW??

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a big deal for LGBTQ rights

 

2nd Circuit appeals court just ruled in favor of a gay worker, saying anti-gay discrimination is prohibited under 1964 civil rights law.

It’s a loss for the Justice Dept, which injected itself into the case to argue against gay rights.
 

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/dominicholden/a-federal-court-just-ruled-for-gay-rights-in-a-major?utm_term=.mxLG8G78d#.qdw1o1joY

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Why am I confusing Rubio and Cruz??  Oh yeah, right, spineless GOP politicians who only use their ethnicity when it suits their political career.

 

Hopefully people would read click the link and see that it's Texas.  And hey, someone in Florida might also know who this candidate is and have some thought as well (*shrugs*).

I'm just not as interested in getting a pundit's perspective this time around.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Phyllis saying it sexy

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is so confusing. So will CBS and P.Plus just be a day ahead for the rest of the episodes the whole week? 
    • April 15, 1993 is when they first meet. 
    • Does anyone know the air date when Victoria & Cole first meet? Was there a scene when Victoria was sitting on Cole's lap and kissed him? If so, does anyone know the air date?    
    • When is the last time Bridget & Deacon scene happened?
    • Surely that was a joke. Why would anyone seriously ask if Dani had any rooms besides having a bedroom? MOST of the time when we see her, she's in that open, airy, white room with her kitchen far stage left & there's an island & a love seat.  I have meant to post to say how taken I was with Eva last Thursday. You don't know it but I have  not really gotten into either Eva or Leslie/Sheila/Anna/Dana/Mom in the same ways or degrees most of y'all have.  With "Many Names" I get that it's quite a challenge to play that evil & that crazy without becoming cartoonish & she hasn't, so there is that. But, I do not see layers or nuance. I also do not fault the actress. If the gray tones are not there on the page, I don't expect to see them ripped out of thin air. With Eva there were so many questions. Now most have been answered.
    • No kidding. It’s amazing to me that CBS as messy as it was for the 97-98 season landed at #2 that year thanks to Sunday nights, 1/2 of the Monday night lineup, Diagnosis Murder on Thursdays, and oddly the Saturday night line-up. I think CBS was saved by the Winter Olympics not to mention ABC had gotten even messier than CBS’ mess.  CBS came out a more solid for #2 for the 98-99 season but was still very uneven overall. Outside of Sundays the rest of the network’s hits were on checkerboard split between Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.    Had it not been for Who Wants to Be a Millionaire fever I’d say CBS probably would’ve been at #2 for the 99-00 season as well, very much still uneven but of course Survivor and CSI were on the horizon. (*There’s some evidence that CBS may have barely eked out a win for #2 for the 96-97 season but that season’s mess sure doesn’t feel that way)
    • By request, I present to you "Abbott Communications".  
    • Meh, I'm a bit tipsy after coming from a Mother's Day festivity. I should have posted a picture of her and Andre in her little great room.
    • Their question was does she only have a bedroom lol
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy