Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members


very few true journalists on CNN and MSNBC called that man out from Day 1. the rest sold out for access. they ignored all the lies and slander that was being covered by internet news sites, and had big smiles on their faces when he won a primary....and now sit back and act like they are the aggrieved party. AC asked him on the trail what he ordered from McDonald's. softball questions while HRC was getting grilled left and right by these networks. how many stories about Trump were ignored by the majority of on air talent? and now their ratings are high because they blast him every single day. where was this during the campaign? 

Michelle IMPO did a splendid job calling all of these high priced bellhops out for what they have put this nation through in the last year and a half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Frankly, Michelle Wolf's remarks about Sarah Huckabee Sanders don't even compare to what has been said about HRC for decades.  People are upset because she compared SHS to a "Handmaid's Tale" character and said she was the white woman equivalent to Uncle Tom?  Honkies, please.

 

 

Yet, evangelical Christians are convinced this man has been anointed by God.  (Whatever, Jesus freaks.)

 

Yep.

 

I must hand it to Les Moonves: as venal as that man can be, he was right when he said that Trump was "bad for [the country], but good for CBS."  Because, he was.  Someone, even Donald [!@#$%^&*] Trump, with zero political experience, making it all the way to the presidency, made for some damn good copy.

 

But, more than that, I'm starting to believe that the media was MORE determined NOT to let HRC win -- or, at least, not just to hand her what should have been a very winnable election.  If that [!@#$%^&*] c**t and her jumpsuits want to be president so bad, they said, then let her work for it.  Because, honestly?  If it had been another woman in that position -- hell, even someone like "Hanoi Jane" Fonda -- I don't think they would've been as ready to fillet her.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My main issue with her jokes is they felt lazy and done to death (especially the Handmaid's Tale joke) and if she's white then casually throwing around terms like "Uncle Tom" isn't the best idea either. The women in the administration have been the main focus of progressive anger from early on and at this point it's mostly just become a distraction. 

 

I don't care about those who insist oh this is why they hate liberals/the media - those people hate liberals and the media no matter what - I just think she took the easiest path. Her comments about the media profiting from Trump were more honest, and of course were overshadowed by all the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, if she really wanted to be nasty, she could have said what I did the first time I saw Sanders on TV: "Dear God, we've gone from the world's worst varsity wrestling coach...to a fat tranny with a cheap wig and terrible fashion sense."

 

(Now, that, ladies and gentlemen, is being cruel.)

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm also annoyed by the many who have, rather than say, "She didn't attack anyone's looks," instead glibly said "Trump does it too!" What those comments essentially are saying is that it's fine for Trump to do it and there's no point in expecting much else from anyone at this point. If that's how people now feel, then it means they don't have any real room to get upset over his future comments. Given how many people make a meal out of focusing on the outrage of the day (the latest being the Paralmypics comments), they are just twisting themselves into knots. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michelle Wolf is, as they say in today's parlance, "Savage"!  That was R-A-W but anyone who has ever seen her comedy routine should've known what they'd be up for.  To quote Wolf "Should've done your research". 

 

Sarah Sanders Huckabee was a small part of that monologue, from what I saw. I'm not sure why people decided to focus their attention on a bit that was about a minute and a half.

 

Are people seriously getting their noses out of joint about a comedian's monologue?  In the long run, how much impact will Wolf's monologue truly have?  Do most people even remember Minhaj's monologue from last year?

 

I guess it beats talking about the real problems that this country has (and soon will be facing due to poor governance) but okay.

 

 

And then there's this, which truly stood out to me, in addition to the roast of the media:

 

 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ I don't even see why what Michelle Wolf (who I've never heard of before) said is a big deal?  Don't we mostly agree that SHS is out there spouting surreal lies and propaganda on a daily basis?

 

She reminds me of that spokesperson for Saddam's government. The one SNL used to love to mock, who was saying things like the Iraqi army was winning, while CNN was showing footage of decimation. Well, now the joke is on us ( or US).

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=iraqi+propaganda+minister&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1

Edited by Juliajms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We do, yes. She's an awful person and she also seems extremely petty and callous. 

 

The problem I have with Wolf's comments is that like Kellyanne Conway (who also got digs), SHS is a very easy target. Everyone loves to joke about her and make her the big focus of their critiques. In many ways this helps Trump and the GOP (just as the attacks against Melania and Ivanka did, although given Ivanka's more involved role I don't think she should be as exempt) because it distracts from the main decision makers and faces in the administration or in Congress. 

 

And while I don't think she went after SHS' looks, comparing her to a spinster character from a much-hyped show, to a gym teacher, etc. leaves enough room to make people feel she did. 

 

I don't think this "hurts" people who are against Trump (other than the people who say it's fine to make personal attacks because Trump does it - those people are basically telling the world they can never criticize Trump's attacks against people again without being hypocrites) or "hurts" liberalism or whatever, but I do think it's just one more pointless distraction, and I think all the people rushing to defend Michelle Wolf (who will get plenty of money and opportunities from this without being made a free speech martyr) are better off using their time elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ I get what you are saying Carl.  In most cases I cringe at ad hominem attacks. There are just as many ugly Democrats as Republicans, and hell, I won't be winning any beauty contests myself.  We've talked about how some attack old people and wish them death, as if there aren't plenty of wonderful old people out there. 

 

In the context of a comedy routine though,  I don't think what she said was that bad.  I also agree that MW knew what she was doing.  She has a show coming our on Netflix according to a CNN article.  She went for her 15 mins of fame and got it. As you say, there are bigger fish to fry.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's turning out like the Colbert roast tbh - overnight intense fury from the Beltway press, followed by walking it back when most of the Internet says he was right. Wolf's not getting Kathy Griffin'd, in part because she wasn't nearly as foolish as Griffin was. Her remarks on Sanders were calculated and were not physical attacks. While she got vulgar at other times, it was in all the right places AFAIC.

 

You already see Haberman, a queen of passive aggression, walking her attacks back when confronted by people like Kumail Nanjiani and trying to close the issue off. That doesn't happen often. Wolf will be fine and while she may have gotten a bit broad at times for my tastes, I thought she was mostly right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Merkel, who has her own challenges at home, likely wants the path of least resistance with Trump/U.S.  She can't waste time fighting small battles with Trump. It is unlikely that she'll ever consider Trump an actual "friend" in the true sense of the word, but she is a pragmatist, if nothing else.

 

 

Speaking of cases where the media colluded to put a good face on the worst of humanity, this memorial museum on lynching is really causing a reckoning that is now reaching the media.

 

A Lynching Memorial Forces a Reckoning for a Nation, and a Newspaper

 

“We proliferated that idea of white supremacy,” said Mr. Krift, who has been the executive editor for nearly two years.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I did notice a decline in the quality of the performers being cast once Betty R vacated/retired from her position. We would have been spared from the nightmares of some of the castings that dominated the show in the last decade or so of the soap. JFP was an example of someone, no matter the gender, who had no business being in the position they were in.
    • If Betty Rea was the casting director, why was so much of GL during JFP's reign cast by her? Walker, Deas, Crampton, Lando, etc. JFP takes credit for Dusay as well. What is the point of having a casting director, if you don't let her do her job? What happened when Rea left? 
    • So much on here slips my mind but this is the first I remember hearing of Peterson's passing. Very sad. Nell was a thankless role, clearly set up for a cheating storyline with Frank, but Peterson did her best.  Betty Rea Rea was the casting director for the soap opera “Guiding Light” from 1970 to 1996 and simultaneously the casting director for “As the World Turns” from 1979 to 1983.
    • Sorry, just one more post on the Thorntons. How did Ruth and Edna feel about each other prior to Tad dating Dotty?
    • I can't remember exactly but I think it may be 1995 as Jake was trying to hide from a loan shark.
    • I also wonder if it was considered controversial at the time to show a morally corrupt doctor?(another character troupe for Agnes Nixon, the upstanding male citizen who is hiding secrets back at home) Up until the early 1970s, prime-time would very rarely tell stories about the private lives of doctors, because advertisers tended to shy away from such content. @robbwolff -- so is this wrong that Ruth dated David before marrying Joe?  Dr. David Thornton is a fictional character from the ABC daytime soap opera All My Children, portrayed by Paul Gleason from 1976 to 1978.  He was introduced as a respected physician in Pine Valley, presenting himself as a widower to his colleagues at the hospital. This facade, however, concealed a darker truth: his wife, Edna Thornton, was alive, and he was leading a double life. David’s character is defined by manipulation and secrecy, as he maintained a carefully curated public image while engaging in deceitful and criminal behavior in his personal life. His relationships were marked by control and betrayal, particularly in his marriage to Edna and his romantic entanglements with other women. David’s charm and professional status allowed him to navigate Pine Valley’s social circles, but his actions revealed a calculating and ruthless nature. Career David was a doctor at Pine Valley Hospital, where he was well-regarded by his peers for his medical expertise. His professional life provided him with a veneer of respectability, which he exploited to mask his personal misdeeds. However, his career was not a central focus of his storyline; instead, it served as a backdrop to his personal schemes. His position at the hospital gave him access to resources, such as the drug digitalis, which he later used in his attempt to murder his wife. David’s professional life unraveled as his criminal actions came to light, tarnishing his reputation in the medical community. Personal Relationships and Family David’s family and romantic relationships were fraught with tension and deception, shaping much of his narrative arc: Edna Thornton (Wife): David was married to Edna Thornton, with whom he had a daughter, Dottie. To his colleagues, he claimed Edna was deceased, allowing him to pursue other relationships without suspicion. In reality, David was plotting to kill Edna, motivated by his desire to be free of her and possibly to gain financial or personal freedom. He began poisoning her with digitalis, a heart medication, which caused her to experience heart pains. Edna was unaware of David’s true intentions until after his death, when the truth about his poisoning scheme was revealed. Dottie Thornton (Daughter): David and Edna’s daughter, Dottie Thornton, was a significant character in All My Children. Portrayed by Dawn Marie Boyle (1977–1980) and later Tasia Valenza (1982–1986), Dottie was raised primarily by Edna. David’s neglectful and manipulative behavior extended to his daughter, as he showed little genuine care for her well-being. Dottie’s life was impacted by her father’s actions, particularly after his death, when Edna became a wealthy widow. Dottie later married Thaddeus “Tad” Martin in 1985, though their marriage ended in divorce in 1986, and she suffered the loss of an unborn child with Tad. Ruth Parker (Fiancée, 1976): David was engaged to Ruth Parker in 1976, furthering his pattern of deceit since he was still married to Edna. His engagement to Ruth, who was also involved with Jeff Martin, highlighted David’s willingness to manipulate romantic partners for his own gain. The engagement did not lead to marriage, as David’s true intentions and double life began to surface. Christina “Chris” Karras (Lover, 1978): In 1978, David began a romantic relationship with Dr. Christina “Chris” Karras, a fellow physician. This affair added another layer of complexity to his web of lies, as Chris was unaware of his marriage to Edna and his poisoning scheme. After David’s death, Chris was initially accused of his murder due to their relationship and her access to medical resources. However, Jeff Martin’s investigation cleared her name by proving David’s death was caused by his own actions. Parents: David’s parents are unnamed in the source material, and both are noted as deceased. No further details are provided about their influence on his life or their role in his backstory. Death David Thornton’s death in 1978 was a dramatic and fitting conclusion to his villainous arc, brought about by his own treachery. Intent on killing Edna to escape their marriage, David had been secretly administering digitalis to her, causing her heart issues. In a twist of fate, their daughter, Dottie, innocently switched Edna’s drink with David’s during one of his poisoning attempts. Unaware that the drink was laced with a lethal dose of digitalis, David consumed it and suffered a fatal heart attack. His death was initially investigated as a possible murder, with Chris Karras as the prime suspect due to her relationship with David and her medical knowledge. However, Dr. Jeff Martin conducted a toxicology screen on David’s body, which revealed that the digitalis poisoning was the cause of both Edna’s heart pains and David’s death. This evidence exonerated Chris and exposed David’s plan to kill his wife, cementing his legacy as a tragic and self-destructive figure. Impact and Legacy David Thornton’s storyline, though relatively short-lived (1976–1978), was impactful due to its intensity and the ripple effects on other characters. His death left Edna a wealthy widow, altering her and Dottie’s circumstances and setting the stage for further drama, including Edna’s manipulation by conman Ray Gardner. David’s actions also strained relationships among other Pine Valley residents, particularly through his engagement to Ruth Parker and affair with Chris Karras, which intersected with Jeff Martin’s storyline. His character exemplified the classic soap opera archetype of a charming yet duplicitous villain whose downfall is precipitated by his own hubris. Additional Notes Portrayal: Paul Gleason’s performance as David Thornton brought a compelling intensity to the role, making the character memorable despite his brief tenure. Gleason’s ability to portray both charm and menace suited David’s dual nature as a respected doctor and a scheming husband. Storyline Context: David’s arc occurred during the early years of All My Children, a period when the show focused on intricate personal dramas and moral dilemmas. His poisoning plot and double life were emblematic of the show’s penchant for high-stakes interpersonal conflict. Lack of Additional Family Details: Beyond Edna and Dottie, no other family members (such as siblings or extended relatives) are mentioned in the source material, limiting the scope of his familial connections. Conclusion Dr. David Thornton was a multifaceted antagonist in All My Children, whose life was marked by professional success, personal deception, and a fatal miscalculation. As a doctor, he wielded authority and respect, but his secret plan to murder his wife, Edna, revealed a cold and calculating core. His relationships with Edna, Dottie, Ruth Parker, and Chris Karras were defined by manipulation, and his death by accidental self-poisoning was a poetic end to his schemes. David’s legacy in Pine Valley lived on through Edna’s newfound wealth and Dottie’s subsequent storylines, making him a pivotal figure in the show’s early narrative. His story remains a classic example of soap opera drama, blending betrayal, tragedy, and retribution.
    • The only blonde I see is one of the actual women staring at first & then screaming & running later.  DAYS: Vivian's manservant Ivan is in a long curly red wig. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Y&R: long straight black wig is the actor Peter Barton whose character name I am blanking on.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy