Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

To remove Hannity, it's probably going to boil down to money as it did in the case of O'Reilly. People boycotting companies that advertise on Hannity's show. I was kidding about growing a conscience since I know very well that no one at that company has one.

 

 Meanwhile, before Trump met with the Pope, apparently someone told Bannon "You don't gotta go home but you gotta get the hell outta here!" Or something of that nature.

 

 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

These are the reasons rehashing the 2016 election serves zero purpose. One can learn from it and move on without alienating people. There were 2 seats won yesterday, this one and another in New Hampshire, both held by republicans before the election, both in pro trump districts, both seats in long time GOP held districts. THis is what happens when people work together. Pelegrino's election is a perfect example of people working together. She had the backing and money from the party establishment, she was also backed by the teachers union who gave her a good pool of money.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrats-win-two-elections_us_59250144e4b0ec129d3082d0

 

And I want to remind people this is not the first. Here in Illinois, there were a ton of local elections democrats won in April in areas like Elgin, Normal. Kankakee, Champaign - areas and races held by republicans in the state. This was big news here.  I helped with a local election in Berwyn where half the democratic establishment was beaten by Berwyn United members, a more progressive group. Anyone who knows about the establishment in Illinois knows what a cancer it is in some cases. Berwyn had the typical cronyism in full view and the party money.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/democrats-grassroots-trump-elections_us_58efd21de4b0bb9638e270c1

 

When you see successes happening so soon at the local and state levels, it's very discouraging to hear many still beat the drum of failure. No one is pretending there have not been problems and still aren't, but many are working their tails off to change things. THe fact that it's happened in some cases as quickly as it has is a testament to the foot soldiers making it happen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

An article about how increasingly difficult it's become for anyone to react to negative campaigning.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/24/trump-montana-mudslinging-special-election-238749

 

I think this is somewhat untrue, it mostly just depends on the campaign and the ads and research/hit pieces used, but I can believe some of it. I remember seeing the pro-Hillary ad late in the campaign that was nothing but Trump clips. It gave me a sick feeling in my stomach because I knew it would desensitize people to him. And it did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is and the medium income there is something like 150k

 

About some key wins yesterday

 

Pellegrino won because she had universal democratic support(Democratic Party, Working Families Party) and is a young teacher against common core, something that likely resonates with people from that area.

 

Trump won the district by 60 - she won with 58%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Working Families Party has become a force to be reckoned with in the Northeast over the past decade, so I can see this happening, even in L.I.

 

Trump continues his gaffes and moments to flop oversees, I see.

 

Speaking of flops, I have also been reading about the fallout from the Trump budget (that Trump promptly escaped from by being oversees) and the fact that no one actually likes this turkey. Most Congressional GOP members' responses have ranged from the non-committal or terse and a few down-right hostile. Paul Ryan promptly said that he and Congress plan to do what they've done through other administrations, which is work on their own version. (sound familiar?  Many GOP Senators said something similar about the atrocious AHCA bill that the House passed after many admitted it was DOA in the Senate).

 

One of the most common complaints is that the budget plan simply makes no sense- it seems to be cost neutral to the point of functioning as a place marker but assumes that all this growth will occur over a multi-year time span.

In other words, it declares growth in various areas but doesn't identify what the costs will pay, how some of these things will be 'paid for'.  

 

This budget plan not making it through seems as if it will also affect the tax plan, which also seems to be a 'No-Go' .Tax cuts for the rich by adding taxes to imports seems unsustainable as the costs will most likely be passed onto the consumer, the brunt of which will be paid by the people who can least afford these extra costs. The only support this has is from companies that do a whole lot of exporting- and for them, it is built solely on a hope that their income taxes might be reduced as a result.

This is not even a definite, it is a hope! Kind of like how many of the Trump voters hoped he would be competent with fiscal policy. Guess what folks?  He really doesn't have one!  What little he has, is mostly bad.

 

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I never understood the point of Marchetti. Summer left the show for a job there in Italy. OK. When she returned they had Jack buy the company. Why couldn't Summer have returned and simply stated it was not a good fit, she missed her home , family/friends etc It was absurd that this internationally successful fashion empire could just be bought by a US cosmetics firm at the drop of a hat. What was the point when they never did anything with it at all? Summer simply could have gone to work at Jabot. And wasn't there some nonsense about an offshhoot called Marchetti Home? Was Phyllis attached to that at some point? This show...
    • Leslie:

      Please register in order to view this content

      Ted:  
    • And based on the previews for today, maybe we’ll, uh, finally see something

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Haven't seen today's ep yet but so will be interested to see the clothes. So far I think they have been very character specific (even if I don't like some of them eg Kat's cutsie style) Anita is very showy/glittery, Nicole classic elegance, Dani sexy/bold colors etc. Unlike Y&R which seems much more generic. Also BTG pays attention to the men's wardrobe and has developed a style for the boyz-which is harder to do with male fashion. The absence of any of Derek/Ashley at any of these big events again demonstrates how they are in a different universe to the rest of the show. Not that a nurse and a fireman would be there but still they seem destined at this point to stay in their own lane and have little interaction with the core of the show.
    • Agnes had written for Bernard Grant for many years on TGL as well as Ernest Graves and Joe Gallison,Doris Belack,Robert Milli,and  Antony Ponzini at AW. So she would probably gravitate to writing a role with an actor in mind or choosing someone she had written for before who she knew could deliver.
    • Once Johnny Dallas' cut himself off from Laurie Ann Karr and their son, and once Laurie successfully recovered from her mental problems, she wanted a new, fresh, and healthy start for the next chapter of her life. She legally reverted her name and changed John Victor's  surname to Karr. After moving to the country (when Teri  Keane was dropped from the show), Bill and Martha Marceau legally adopted Jennifer, the baby girl whom they had earlier taken in when the child's biological mother, Taffy Simms (and other bio family members) proved to be unfit to raise her. Jennifer legally and emotionally became a Marceau, and gave that name to her own daughter, whom Jennifer birthed through surrogacy as a single parent. Et...voila! The Karr and Marceau legacies live on.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • BLQ is having second thoughts regarding putting her baby up for adoption. Chase is upset he can't tell Dante. So both are putting this on at lulus feet. Saying she is holding it over them. Lulu is doing none of this. 
    • Yes she absolutely was involved in that story which seems to have gone nowhere.  She didn't start to remove herself from the writing until 1973.
    • Y'all are bringing back great memories of AMC 2.0 for me.  I haven't thought about it and the new characters in so long, well since it aired, and I plan to go re-watch it now. When AMC ended, I finally came to peace with it and accepted that I will never watch an hour of a TV show daily in my life again... something that I had been doing since I was 6-7 years old. I was starting a new career, relationship, and chapter in life when AMC 2.0 came out.  I found a way to watch it, but things felt differently for me at the time and when it was so short-lived and gone, it became such a distant memory, sadly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy