Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Romney has been losing support over the summer from groups he had decent support with. He's lost traction with white males. This selectIon while understandable to an extent, is going to lose him support from seniors. The media loving Ryan(they love anyone who is controversial) isn't going to help them once they get organizations like AARP against them.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Picking Ryan was a dream come true for the democrats because unlike so many hacks Ryan at least puts some ideas out--ideas to be destroyed and him along with it. Romney can duck every issue and say he is severely conservative and shoots varmints, but Ryan has talked actual specifics in the past. He won't be able to dodge like Palin and blame everything on the lamestream media.

Romney was ill served by his competitors this spring. Amateurs, religious lunatics, whack jobs and book peddlers are not going to prepare you for a real campaign. He doesn't have any response on this whole tax return issue and now he is bringing on a VP whose claim to fame is he wants to lower taxes on the rich! Newt said it best, "right wing social engineering" and I am sure we will be hearing that phrase more than once this fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it is an intersting pick. It is risky, but of course, Romney was bullied into doing it. Ryan is a smart man. his budget presents a contrast to Obama. I don't like the Ryan budget, but he is intellectually honest. Romney is not intellectually honest and the question is will the contrast be between the Democratic and Republican tickets or between the issue commitment between the top and bottom of the Republican ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not going to say how any one voting block will vote. And, IMPO, if anyone thinks they know the electorate of this country I feel they may be making a mistake. The same way the CNM thinks they know how everyone will vote. They follow polls that mean nothing and then, when they are embarrassed this November 6th, they will blame everything else but themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like they need more money....no way in hell would I vote for someone who is part of a team like that...I didnt think Romney was that stupid although he does look it....but I was wrong...stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Ryan is the most beneficial pick (that would have been Rubio), but he is an honest man of substance who will at least get the base excited for Romney. People are saying this is a risky pick, but it really isn't, when you consider the fact that Romney is heavily favored to lose regardless of who his VP was. Unless something drastically changes in the next 85 days or so, Romney will only win 206 electoral votes: those from NC, IN, and the 22 McCain states. Even before choosing Ryan, Romney was poised to lose FL (as the vast majority of polls have shown). Thus, Ryan cannot be blamed if Romney loses FL and/or the election.

Honestly, aside from Rubio or Rice (neither of whom wanted the job), I think that the other contenders may have been worse than Ryan:

Tim Pawlenty: The worst choice of all, IMO. A total zero at campaigning and debating, and he excites absolutely no one. A Romney/Pawlenty ticket would have fizzled into obscurity.

Rob Portman: Better than Pawlenty (because he might have helped in OH and apparently is a good debater), but still excites no one. Plus, Dems would be attacking his Bush connections with the same zeal they are attacking the Ryan plan. (I also doubt he'd help much in OH, because about 60% of state residents don't even know who he is.)

Bobby Jindal: While he may have excited the base, he fizzled terribly the one time he was on the national stage (responding to BHO's 2009 State of the Union Address).

Bob McDonnell: While he would have helped in VA, his very conservative stance on social issues (especially abortion) would widen the gender gap even more.

Chris Christie: Many feel he would have been a great choice, but I strongly disagree. His ego is way too large to play second fiddle, and there's no way he could stay on message. Instead, he would upstage Romney at every opportunity in preparation for his 2016 presidential campaign.

Though it's a given that those who despise Romney will despise Ryan as well, his selection certainly disproves the steadfast belief held by some that the GOP is all about persecuting gays. If that was true, then why didn't Mitt select Rick Santorum, Michele Bachmann, Don Cathy, or Missy Reeves instead?

I've decided to share some analysis regarding the Ryan selection. This insight doesn't come from some biased outfit like Talking Points Memo, but rather from one of the most respected and objective men in the business: Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia (and his "Crystal Ball"). Sabato's track record at predicting election results is stellar, so his words carry a lot of significance:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EYksQa2nv9c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's very tragic news about Lee Hamilton's wife. Like his fellow co-chair on the 9/11 Committee--Republican Tom Kean (whom I consider to be the best NJ governor in the modern era)--Hamilton is a centerist who has always commanded lots of bi-partisan respect.

In other political tragedies, George McGovern's son recently died. Sadly, I have read that both he and his friend Bob Dole are in failing health. Whatever you think of these mens' politics, both men were war heroes who also served their country most admirably in Congress. Because of their integrity, neither deserved to be subjected to the ruthless personal attacks and humiliation they experienced during their presidential runs.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy