Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

There is a difference though between contested and divisive that is a little blurry at times. Ford/Reagan was a little divisive because Reagan wouldn't even shake Ford's hand and unite the party but even that didn't stop Ford until his made a huge blunder at a debate. Carter/Kennedy was divisive because Kennedy took it all the way to the convention, but I doubt Carter could have won under any circumstances.

This time though doesn't seem so divisive. The republicans seemed on a runaway train to nominating a guy after two tiny states, and that seems really unfair to everybody else and to the candidate who gets tricked into thinking he actually ran a campaign. Two states and no criticism would just leave Romney a sitting duck for Obama who does know what a tough campaign is all about.

The republicans did a fine job in finding a candidate: Their choice is a candidate republicans don't like or a candidate nobody else but republicans like. They need to take a long look at the negative affect if the tea party and the quality of candidates this two-party dalliance has created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3458

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

More of the Beltway media pining for Mitch Daniels, a charisma-free zone who would have fared the same way Huntsman did. Chris Cizzila is the guy who spent years telling readers about the glories of "T-Paw" and how "T-Paw" would be so formidable, so what do you expect.

http://www.washingto...mffLQ_blog.html

Also strange that media darling Daniels was chosen since his policies while working in the Bush White House helped create the financial disasters of the last decade. I guess that just makes him even more of a hero.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, everybody on the left cheered when Michael Moore called Bush a deserter. Some liberals even suggested that he had previous knowledge of 9/11.

And Carl, it doesn't appear to me that most in the media are nodding along. Rather, this RNC Chairman's comments are being portrayed in a negative light.

And while Obama did in no way compares to that cruise captain, the fact of the matter is that he has done some extraordinarily insensitive things (while so many are out of work), like when he held an "Alice in Wonderland" themed Halloween party in 2009, or last year when he threw himself a star-studded 50th birthday bash. It's funny, though, that the "conservatively biased" media still goes out of its way to portray Barry as such a "likeable" person even after acting like such a prick. (Meanwhile, the "cold and calculating" Romney was constantly at his wife's side as she battled MS. Thus, because the liberal media has inaccurately portrayed both men, I have zero doubt that Obama will win the election.)

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Those people weren't running the DNC. This man is the head of the Republican Party.

The only hint of a negative reaction I saw was from Bob Scheiffer. I've even seen articles which tsk-tsked because the DNC head wasn't as OTT as Priebus was. This is all a fun game to the media, and the uglier the comparisons, the better (especially if it's on the right). Look at how breathlessly they covered the claims that Obama wanted to kill old people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, that is what news reporting should do. (The article also reminds us of how bad the recent tragedy at sea was.) Just let the facts speak for themselves (without editorializing), and the man will be viewed in a negative light.

Edited by Max
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • And, to me it is a little bit hilarious that AW fans all over continue to refer to it as Egyptian Dust Recently elsewhere I've been running polls. When did you stop watching AW or What storyline caused you to stop watching AW. You may be interested to know that sticking it out till the bitter end is winning by a landslide. Next highest vote getter is - no surprise - Frankie's murder. So that covers like 60% & next 20%. Then the votes drop way down to 10% and well below but a wide array of reasons are given, including but not limited to  Justine Lumina Rachel having twins at her age, how ridiculous Mac's death the 90 minute show firing JC, George R & Dwyer Hmm, I know there are a few more, in the 1%-3% range but I cannot think of what they are. Sorry, my bad. Should have made notes but I didn't know I would be posting about it. LOL!!  
    • A kind angel has added both episodes to the vault (UK Diva TV broadcast version). 
    • Yes, I think that is the most likely situation.  TPTB were unhappy with the offer(s) they got from the tourism board in Finland, and decided the trip was going to be too expensive for P&G/NBC to finance alone.   I would also speculate a similar situation likely occurred a few years later with the planned location shoot in Egypt, which was also cancelled after the storyline had already started, and changed to Arizona.  
    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy