Jump to content

Y&R: TVGuide 2009 SPOILERS


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Lauralee Bell will be back next year as Christine. No info on the timing or for how long.

Asked specifically about bringing back Victoria Rowell as Drucilla, Maria Bell says they have no plans.

A core character will have a "stunning death". I can guess who this will be from the uncasting spoiler posted else-board.

Katherine's journey back to GC will be a difficult one.

A lavish old-school soap wedding is planned fro the spring.

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

There was also a rumor that Adam and Heather will exit Y&R. Let's hope it will only stay a rumor.

I don't like the news about Rowell, but I'm not at all surprised.

I'm glad Christine will be back. ;)

And we all know who will be the core character dying.

  • Members
Posted

Good to have Lauralee back, Christine has been missed (can't believe I just typed that)

No surprise about Victoria Rowell, I'm fine with it.

So long Bradley, I'll miss ya.

My hope is that when Katherine returns to GC, she'll be a hurricane.

Heather and Adam? Lavish soap wedding sounds good!

  • Members
Posted

Like the idea of an old school soap wedding.

I'm kinda happy to see Christine back. She was never my fav character, but it's always nice to see a familiar face back.

And I'm glad Katherine's return won't be coming that fast.

  • Members
Posted

I'm guessing Nikki/Paul will get married. Makes sense, because IMO these two characters share a huge history with the show and I can see old faces coming back to see them wed. Either them, or Ashley/Victor. If it's old school it has to be one of these two couples. Unfortunately I don't see TPTB going old school for Neil/Karen and if they do, I see Dru interrupting it. ;) Also, isn't Heather and Adam getting married on Christmas?

  • Members
Posted

Sounds good.

We already know there's no way in hell Victoria Rowell will be back.

Hell, I'm even excited to see Christine again, and I've never liked her.

I'm glad they're taking their time with the Katherine storyline. That's how Bill Bell would have done it.

This lavish wedding has me intrigued.

  • Members
Posted

Old school wedding sounds great.

Ash and Victor?

Nikki and Paul?

If Cristine is coming back for a reason, may be it's the wedding and that would make sense to be Paul or Victor.

Karen and Neil? A redo? Sharon and Nick? Adam and Heather are engaged but how many guests would they get at their wedding?

  • Members
Posted

I'm glad Christine is coming back. I know many hate the character, but I don't mind her.

At this point, I no longer care if Victoria Rowell comes back. I'm enjoying the Winters family again without Drucilla, so she's not needed.

I guess Brad's getting killed. :(

I bet the lavish old-school soap wedding will be that of Nick and Sharon, or Victor and Ashley.

  • Members
Posted

Eventually MAB and Co. will come to their senses and invite Rowell back. It'll take a while but they'll get it together.

  • Members
Posted

I guess Y&R decided to give that snot Lauralee what she wanted to return, a contract and storyline. After she refused to come back for their 30 year episode and Kay's death, they should have given her character what she deserved, an off screen death. I hate this news.

  • Members
Posted

What surprises me is that they seem to have storylines planned in advance to Spring 2009. This is a stark contrast to Latham, and most other shows in daytime that appears to make stories up as they go along.

I'm glad that there's some type of organization at Y&R again.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I could've sworn FV let other people direct either here or at OLTL. I may be wrong. IIRC Kimberly is now very active directing multi-cam/sitcom work.
    • IIRC MVJ said the million was just the first piece of what Leslie got or was already owed, something they did make explicit in dialogue but not too explicit. Still, I am past worrying about it. I do think they want 30-yo elder millennial Peaches in her Sophia Petrillo wig to be a point of pathos for Leslie. In theory I am fine with that, and don't dislike Peaches despite the jarring physical disconnect and need for a recast lol. But I do think they do a lot of B&B-style whizzing from Point A to Point C with Leslie on this kind of stuff - in one scene she is raising hell, in the next she is weeping over Peaches. There's very little transition to that sometimes that allows for the nuance, and that can be done much better and they can go much deeper with Leslie (and most characters). The newer/younger audience for the show may have less issue with this kind of quick change than we do.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       Thank you.   That was part of my reasoning as well. I think about the days of Kevin, Joey, and Jessica on OLTL or Lucky/Liz/Nik/Sarah/Emily on GH or the Last Blast Kids on DAYS or the Glow by Jabot kids, and it takes me back. Sure I started soaps due to the older cast with their divas, but I do like to see people around my age back then, too. Great memories.   So I love a good relatable teen tale. Bullying. Hormones for the Bad Boy. College choices and internal conflict. 
    • Thank you for the information.  I did listen to the entire interview with Miss Roux -- way back when it was first released.  But I am unable to recall her mentioning Connie Ford, and don't have time nor effort to listen to the entire thing again, just for one small morsel. So again, thanks for responding.    I do recall Roux sounded extremely fragile and perhaps a bit wounded in the interview. I almost felt guilty for even listening to it.  So perhaps that has some influence on my reluctance to listen to it again.  She seemed troubled, to say the least.   
    • Boxer-briefs, huh?   Well...called it on Cane/Giggly Heffa hooking up so not surprised.
    • Do you have Addie’s first air date??
    • Even now Victor is always so warm with Ashley. I liked their brief re-pairing as well.
    • @depboy Thanks. That does help. @titan1978 @Paul Raven Really enjoying the analysis of the production methods and what Monty was doing.  I wish we got some of those biopics here that a few UK soaps got as a biopic on Monty's first few years at GH would be fascinating. 
    • The original 'mansion' was one of the set upgrades they did in 1980 . It was the Chandler residence. When that story fizzled out I think it became Stuart Whyland's house -not 100 on that. But it was revealed that Stuart was working for the Di Mera's (rewrite) so Stefano moved into that house. Mmmm...then it became Alex Marshall's? Neil and Liz lived there also. At some point it was finally replaced.  
    •   Thanks. I'm glad she got to as I know some producers tend to get mad if actors want to direct.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy