Jump to content

ATWT: Thoughts on Noelle Beck as Lily?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Okay so she's been in the role for a few months now. What are people's thoughts on her? Do you like her? Is she accepted as a good recast? Does she stink? Do you prefer Martha, etc....

I have to say I love her. I like her in the role much better than Martha Byrnes. I never cared for Lily before but I have to say when I do see NB as her on ATWT, she's one of my favorite characters. She's made the role her own and Im not finding her Lily as annoying as I found MB. What do you ATWT fans think of her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I really like her in the role. She's as relatable as Martha Byrne was, but she has that edge of class and refinement (that Byrne lacked) that Lucinda Walsh's daughter should have. I just wish they'd give her something more challenging to do than Lily and Holden's on again off again relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anyone can be recast, I've never truly believed an actor owns a role.

However, I find Beck a little too polished and "beautiful" to be Lily. I've always thought part of the appeal of the character was that she looked like a real woman, Martha Byrne looked like a real woman, that doesn't mean she's ugly, just average and beautiful in a more atypical manner. Noelle Beck is more mainstream "beautiful," and in a way, her Lily is a completely different character from what Martha was playing over the past three years or so.

Noelle's a good actress, but the role she's playing is severely damaged. The Lily character seems directionless and they're not really giving her anything substantial to showcase herself.

Also, Martha does look a lot more like Lisa Brown (Ex-Iva ATWT, ex-Nola GL) than Noelle does, but I can easily let that slide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've tried , but she just isn't Lily to me. She has zero chemistry with Jon Hensley or Elizabeth Hubbard. I keep thinking how much better the confrontations with Carly would be if Martha was still in the role. Also, she is awful when it comes to crying scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I find it doesn't really matter to me. There's an odd disconnect when she tries to own Lily's history, like when she exploded at Lucinda after Dusty's return. But having a different actress in the role helped me accept some of her out-of-character behavior, like boinking Mike or trying to run Carly down.

On the cost/benefit analysis, I wish they'd waited to recast the role. The fact Goutman used the Holden/Carly story to justify recasting the role immediately is laughable. Especially since the fallout ended faster than a 100 meter dash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just my opinion, but if they can write Lily with an edge the minute Noelle Beck came on the scene, why couldn't they have done the same thing all those years that Martha Byrne was in the role... I am not going to say that it's all Martha that didn't bring depth and spunk to the role of Lily, but possibly the way the powers that be dumbed her down so much. That's just a thought to think on.

Can't always blame the actors/actresses for the way the character is or say that they didn't bring this or that to the role; it also takes the writing material too, and there were way too many times in recent years that the writers just gave out crappy stories that could have been excellent ones for the character of Lily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy