Jump to content

Y&R: Week of October 20th, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Awesome, awesome show on Monday. It worked on a number of levels for me:

1. Thom Racina wrote, and Andrew Lee directed, but there were real homages to the past. I'm wondering if this is the work of the returned Natalie Minardi Slater.

Nick and Victoria were talking about the devastation of losing someone you love to violence, and the vengeance motive it can inspire. But could it lead you (i.e., Victor) to KILL? Nick says yes, Victoria says no. But here is the cool part...Nick mentioned the loss of Cassie...and his thirst for vengeance (against Daniel). Victoria turned around mentioned losing her love, Ryan, to Trisha's violence before her eyes. But she was not vengeful.

This was actually a few minutes devoted to appropriate history. Color me shocked!

2. They are setting up Jack for a massive fall. We have already seen how he is hiding all traces of his connection to the "diary", making Adam use his phone, be the only one to be seen by the forger...

Now, Adam has written a (fairly heartfelt and angry) introduction to Victor's "diary". He talks about how the Newmans showed him the cold shoulder, which is completely true...and how this has motivated his anger ever since.

Jack was all smiles and congratulations to Adam, for writing with such "passion". But as soon as he was out of earshot, Jack called Adam a "schmuck".

Hmmm...what is Jack's motivation for hostility toward Adam, OTHER than the Newman blood coursing through his veins?

This kind of unmotivated animus is going to, karmically, get Jack in trouble!

3. Heather IS annoying...no question...but the scenes with Heather, Nikki, Michael, and Victor (on the cell phone) were pure gold.

Victor was being all Victor...telling Nikki he was severing ties, but NOT out of affectionate grounds ("I meant what I said to you on the beach in Mexico!"). He told Michael to keep his retainer ('the money means nothing to me"), and he was cutting off all ties.

Then, when Victor learned that Heather was in the room, he DEMANDED to talk to her. He ORDERED Michael to put him on the phone with that "ambitious assistant DA".

AND THAT WAS THE CLIFFHANGER!!!

The writing team TOTALLY understands what gets us to tune in tomorrow. Not explosions, crashes, murders.

Nothing but the simple, squealing delight of watching Victor ream out that young b*tch Heather. Can't wait!!!!

4. The only false note, for me, was the arc involving Paris, Eden, and Noah. Now, Kevin Schmidt is pure cuteness, and he plays a teenaged boy brilliantly.

. Eden is Eden...that's not the topic here.

But suddenly there is this whole discussion of how Eden has been "keeping" news of the French field trip from Lauren. Huh? Hasn't she only attended about two days of classes? Where would Eden get the $$ to go? (I guess the rich Fenmore legacy?). Would Eden have a passport? I thought she was "off the grid"?

Of course, this is all a contrivance to set up

...but still...that was a little piece of plot driven nonsense that detracted from an otherwise totally fun show.

I can't wait to see Victor verbally abuse Heather tomorrow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well if you should appreciate anything about tomorrow's U.S. episode, its the wonderful musical scores used, especially during the Katherine/Gloria scenes. I thought Chapman played those scenes excellently, and she reminded me of a young vixen Jill. Those scenes, and Billy/Cain were the best parts for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok as a Heather and Vail fan, I wasn't a fan of the scenes just because I'm SO tired of the character being the whipping girl--dude, her father didn't even put her first. Like someone said, Heather working at Jabot worked, I wish they would have kept that, or do something else with the character.

I've actually liked Eden from the start--but I thought today the scenes were much stronger and cute between Noah and Eden. Seemed as if the actress was feeling more confidant and it worked well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with your Heather point. I think she worked best (was most likeable) at Jabot. THAT SAID, if the goal is somehow to make Adam and Heather the two "castoffs" (abandoned by their fathers, socially isolated--in part because of their own brittle natures, vengeful), and to have dysfunction flow from that, I'm okay with it.

I am starting to fear that Adam is not a long-timer...why are they writing him as such a "schmuck"?

I don't know about Eden. I agree she seemed a bit more comfortable...but I just don't find her appealing. I'd like to see 'quirky' not ... 'irritated'.

I hope you are right about that casting scoop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't see Adam going anywhere any time soon. Brad has always been a "schmuck" and he has been on the show since the 80s. But the thought of Adam leaving does have a certain appeal. IMO, he has become the Scrappy-Doo of the Newman family.

Eden is still nails on a chalkboard for me. It's not so much her acting as it is her voice (although her acting is still far from Oscar worthy). I find it hard to believe that ANYONE has a voice that annoying (aside from a certain former Y&R actress).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack calling Adam a "shmuck" behind his back is what really surprised me. Jack used to revel in being the "real" father figure for Victor Newman's brood. He was also Daniel's mentor for a while and still acts that way with Noah and Billy. I'm not sure why he's turning on Adam who, let's face it, has absolutely nobody apart from Heather at this point. I think he's setting him up to take the fall for the fake diary because that whole scheme is inept and ripe for exposure.

Plus, his obsession with imitating Victor's voice and thinking up the diary entries... it's creepy.

LOL at Victor calling up Michael and Nikki and barking orders. They really do leap when he orders them to jump. I wish Y&R would develop the current relationship between Nikki and Paul, though. Seeing Nikki on an adventure, thinking on her feet in Rio, having Paul bail her out... has Nikki ever felt more alive? It strikes me that Paul could be very good for Nikki, pushing her to take risks in a way Victor has never allowed her to do (which was one of the reasons why I loved Nikki with Bobby Marsino).

I am just about ready for Cane and Billy to start scrapping, so I am looking forward to today. The Chancellor household/Chloe/Jabot stuff is what has me watching, to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Me...this Victor story has me watching.

JP called Monday's show awful...I'm amazed we could watch the same ep and have such polar-opposite opinions.

"Let me speak to that ambitious young assistant district attorney!". Then in the preview, "Listen carefully (or was it "Be quiet"?) or you will never hear my voice again."

I haven't waited with such anticipation for the next show in FOREVER. I can't WAIT to see Victor ream her out!

That is what a cliffhanger should be, IMO. Even the dastardly Jack provokes a REACTION ("you miserable louse! I hope you get what is coming to you!"), which is what I want my soaps to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
    • I need to go and find less.
    • Scroll to page 2 and there it is.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy