Jump to content

AMC: How do you think the 2008 Tornado will compare to the 1994 one?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think, sadly, it's bound to be a disappointment. The '94 Tornado was original and as the video plainly demonstrates, the effects were realistic and they absolutely hold up. You could easily air that scene today and audiences would be surprised. Absolutely wonderful direction and timing (especially when the doorbell of the Martin house begins to ring because of the wind which Tad doesn't realize and then BOOM the door breaks off the frame)...also, that white and black tile floor just looks so decadent with all the wind and dust and destruction.

CGI is not realistic, it's cheap and that's why it's used. I bet the '94 Tornado was very expensive to stage.

I will tune in to see how it goes, but I am betting I won't be impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think, sadly, it's bound to be a disappointment.

============================

But you won't know that until it happens.. You never know you could be surprised. :)

(especially when the doorbell of the Martin house begins to ring because of the wind which Tad doesn't realize

==================================================

Oh!!! Is that what it was? I was wondering who was ringing the doorbell!:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't you see the footwashing? How can you say B&B is not emotionally rich? Katie after her interaction with demon Storm?

But I agree with you here.

Y&R...less so. It is not what it could be, but there are performers who are bringing it. First and foremost (and trust me...it SHOCKS me to write this) Joshua Morrow. What an awesome revelation. I believe in his feelings for his dad, his son, his wife, his ex-wife. And the 8/6/08 post-Sudden Impact episode was a thing of beauty that still remains on my DVR. But I don't want to hijack the thread. I wasn't making a between-show comparison, I was making an over-time comparison. (One that, correctly, might apply to many shows right now...but that wasn't my point).

It's funny, because in another thread I commented on HOW emotionally compelling GH:Night Shift is.

I take it you believe the new tornado WILL be emotionally satisfying??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I'm not a viewer of AMC, so obviously didnt watch the first tornado, but whoever came up with the idea of the Martin doorbell ringing was very creative.. (was McT writing then, it showed her dark humour, the Martin door is always open and the doorbell ringing, only its not a friend but the tornado.) Not to mention I was "blown away," when the door blew in on Tad...I jumped in my seat watching that and I never do that while watching a soap anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well - the Mardi Gras Ball was about as good as the 1994 tornado - special effects and disaster-wise. As long as they don't go overboard with the CGI stuff - and it doesn't look overly fake - I think we'll be good. The Mardi Gras Ball was only 2.5 years ago!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

THe '94 tornado kicked a*s. And not just because of the effects or the directing, but because of the buildup and the repercussions. The discovery of Janet Green/Jane Cox, the chandelier and Julia-on-the-run discovering Noah (who was looting)...perhaps Pratt thinks he is building up to something huge, but it's not just the Metro Station, dude, it's the characters and stories.

The Mardi Gras Blast was poetic, and I also agree that CGI can look like crap, but the stuff with J&A's wedding came off OK, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
    • I'm sorry, truly I am, but this literally made me LOL. Tempting fate, much?

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh, I have very little doubt that Missy feels some way personally and privately.  Donna was just saying she actively spoke out against Days in public in reference to the gay storylines, which she did not. I don't have super strong feeling about Jen one way or another.  She was always a side character to me.  I still think Missy is Jen regardless of her stupid beliefs.
    • I hated the swap-over; Clayton Norcross, to me, was far superior in the role of Thorne than Jeff Trachta ever was. And the recast left me disliking Thorne when he was the superior son to me. As for Teri Ann Linn, I feel like she got the raw deal. Kristen was very clear as a forefronting character, especially in her rivalry with Stephanie, and it feels like she was dropped off for Felicia, and they never returned it. Not to mention the subpar recast with Tracy Melchior in 2001. Someone like Brenda Epperson (ex-Ashley, Y&R) would've been more suited for that role.
    • I just remember when Leo was marrying Craig (?), Greg Rikaart stated a line and made direct eye-contact with Melissa Reeves, and when the camera cut to her, she looked away. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       Rikaart had a mission that day, and he succeeded.
    • I need to go and find less.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy