Jump to content

Y&R: Week of September 29, 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This storyline has been going for two weeks since River showed up and one week with Eden. I have no doubt what you suggested is exactly how they will be playing this. This story won't be on day after day for months like the Newmans, Gloria or in the past the quad. They were ramping up these characters and storyline and were on for a number of consecutive days but they will probably go to two or three days a week now especially that the Abbotts are back.

I think it is too early to say if this story will be good or not. I want to see the Abbotts back, but it has been good for me and other Michael and Lauren fans to see them on screen on consecutive days for the first time in ages. Is it the best storyline I could think for them? No, but it is good having them on screen. Plenty of other characters have been on screen in mediocre storylines until they work them into a decent story. I mean how long have we had to watch this lousy Restless Style story going on. Let's not even talk about the reliquary story. I do care if Michael saves River but I care more about how Lauren and Michael will deal with these changes in their family. Much more than the countdown until the quad once again changes partners and we get another two years of bickering.

Have no fear, I have no doubt Tracey and Christian will be put on back burner again soon enough and we can get five days a week of the Newmans, the reversed quad, the revitalized Abbotts, and Gloria. Michael will be back to being lawyer to everyone and covering for Gloria twice a week and Lauren will be back to her once a week appearance and they will have their interrupted love scenes two or three times a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TOTAL word on that one. I'm SOOO all about those two hooking up.

Interesting---I was out on the net and read some comments from the girl playing Eden--she was directed to play everything how she did. That was what the show was looking for in those first scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope Rauch gets rid of the actress who plays Eden soon. He so won't be impressed by her. For one, her acting sucks, and she's not pretty and blonde, so he won't excuse her bad acting. Either retool the character and recast with a decent actress, or write her out and have her go back to live at the ashram.

Oh and the actress that plays Eden is proof of why Karen Rea, the former casting director, was fired. Hopefully the new casting director will be much better, and I have much more faith in her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that was a conscious decision by Bill Bell based on the loss of key members of the Fosters and Brooks families. When David Hasselhoff left as Snapper and Jaime Lyn Bauer left as Lori Brooks, Bell wasn't sure how well recasts would go over, and he didn't think the remaining Brooks or Fosters, with the exception of Jill, had the staying power to drive story. So he decided to "reinvent" the show by pushing the Williams family to the forefront and beefing up the stories of the Abbotts and Victor and Nikki. Jill already was tied to Jack and John, so she continued on in the Abbott storyline, as did Katherine through her connection to Jill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
    • Why am I only now hearing about what happened in L.A., lol?
    • While I agree that Reeves is Jennifer, I honestly do prefer Cady McClain in the role, as I feel she had/has a wider range of acting capabilities than I feel Reeves has. It's the strength of an actor, ultimately, for me, regardless of how I feel about Reeves' political/social views (which I widely disagree with). Plus, not to mention, they costumed Reeves like an old-fashioned frumpy farm/Moron wife, while McClain had some fashion-forward moments.
    • Wait - so no Will, Jack, or Jen at John's funeral? That’s just weird. What was the point of bringing them back then? Did Julie and Maggie even show up? I mean, seriously.
    • From the comment section of this IG post: theonlydaphneeduplaix Over 70 National commercials over my nearly thirty years career and some how I only have my hands on five

      Please register in order to view this content

      . Thank you @cityofllanview for digging deep and finding this @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000. If anyone feels inclined to dig deep and find more, I’d greatly appreciate it!!!!   https://www.instagram.com/p/DKX9m3ytGIw/ cityofllanview and theonlydaphneeduplaix Now we know Thursday ain't here but here is a Flashback to @longjohnsilvers commercial from 2000 featuring the amazing @theonlydaphneeduplaix make sure to catch her as Nicole on @beyondthegatescbs Weekdays at 2pm on @cbstv and streaming on @paramountplus.                    
    • Full statement from city of Glendale https://www.glendaleca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/9293/16
    • Has anyone ever totted up how many women on GL slept with both father and son(s)? Reva gets a lot of crap for it but she's far from the only one: Claire Beth Blake Olivia Dina Did I miss anyone?  Also, did Reva ever sleep with Phillip? They always had some "closeness" thing, but I don't know if they ever actually did the deed. If they did, then Reva's the clear winner, with TWO families covered, lol!  
    • I think Long was probably planning to have Claire suffer from Post Partum, but she left the writing staff shortly after Claire had Michelle so that element didn't get explored. And I always assumed that when Claire returned in the late 90s/early 00s.. that she was realizing that she messed up by not staying a part of Michelle's life and became resentful/bitter over her previous choices.  That was my theory.  
    • Jenn was a huge part of the success of Days back in the day, and that contribution shouldn't be dismissed.  With that said, I do think her and Jack's time on the show should remain as occasional visits/drop ins. When Missy returns to play Jenn, Jenn is back to being Jenn.   Jenn in her glory days was head strong, fiesty, and was a live wire.... and her scenes with Jack on Friday was classic Jenn with Jack being the voice of reason.   It was the foundation of their relationship back in the day.    
    • Claire was always tightly wound, I think what Long was going to do is to throw the three into this impossible situation with no bad guys, Mo, knowing how to take care of kids from growing up but unable to conceive and Claire, who didnt know how to take care of kids and was totally focused on her career, gets knocked up.  Ryder took Claire off the deep end as a convenient way to make story for characters he wasnt interested in (though Pratt blames McTavish) with little effort. It was later explained to be a brain tumor (though why was she a bitch again when she returned?) \ Claire did sleep with Rick, she was his first!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy