Jump to content

Define "soapy"


Recommended Posts

  • Members

As a somewhat "newbie" to the board (think I've just now crossed over to dayplayer?), I'm curious about the term, "soapy."

I know what I think it means. I also thought I knew what everyone else thought it meant. But lately, I've seen such an overuse of the term to cover such a broad range of characteristics.

So, in your words, define "soapy"'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I can't define it, but based on the way I see the term used, I don't think I like it very much. Usually I see people call something soapy when it . . .

1) Explains away out of character behavior, or rewrites history that the audience knows to be true but now is supposed to disregard as if it never happened to promote stories that don't make sense on their surface.

2) Permits the audience to root for the villain

3) Justifies stories that force the audience to suspend reality or drink the kool aid. (Soapy kool aid sounds awful to me, even if you put vodka in it. Blech!)

There's more, but these three "soapy goodness" situations are top of mind for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm having a hard time defining right now, but here are two examples.

1. On Brothers and Sisters, when Justin and Rebecca turned out NOT to be brother and sister, and first fought their feelings, and then succumbed...every part of that seemed soapy to me. Not in a good way...for a show that I love and that I otherwise think has dealt with things (esp. when Jon Robin Baitz was there) in a fairly authentic way.

2. On Lost, when Kate and Sawyer made love, but then it was clear that her heart was with Jack...that seemed soapy to me.

So, I think soapy for me means the use of classic soap cliche plots (things that do not occur so often in the real world, outside of Jerry Springer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think soapy implies an emotional indulgence of some kind- whether that be revenge, romance, anger- anything you would let yourself do if you indulge in your fantasies a bit too much. When I think of soapy- I imagine seeing people doing the things we all wish we could do everyday, but never indulge in- but it defeats the purpose if we can't imagine doing an activity even in special circumstances- hence the importance of a great character played by a talented actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think soapiness is the low quality, overwrought aspect of daytime drama. The unrealistic plots (amnesia, return from the dead), the cliches (fainting=pregnant, "I've never been happier"= sudden death) and the things the make most people go WTF? (nobody works yet eveyone's rich, apartments without kitchens).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is how I personally define "soapy":

1) By plots

A soap typically includes shootings, kidnappings, affairs, blackmail, amnesia, accidents, triangles, lies, horrible mistakes, paralysis.

2) By cliches

Incredible and incessant coincidences (people walking in at the absolutely worst moment, overhearing, etc), misunderstandings, a whole family living together, things almost always go wrong

3) By style

Soaps by and large tend to have melodramatic dialogue, tight and long close-ups, accompany many scenes with grand/operatic music, reactions are usually far more dramatic than real life, etc.

4) By the total disregard of reality

A soap operates in a completely different world. It is almost 100% impossible for a group of 6 people to go through (1)

5) By Technical aspects

Continuous, multiple storylines going on at the same time, cliffhangers, villains in key roles, usually slow-pace

So, I guess when one says that "that wedding was so well done, so soapy" I think it means that it was the unison of characters who hate each other, secrets and lies bubbling under the surface, ready to explode, bitchy comments, a high tension on whether the marriage will actually happen, surprise twists (Somebody objects! Somebody suddenly shows up! Dramatic music! The secret suddenly comes out! The killer is pretending to be the priest!). Of course there are many decidedly more low-key soaps, but a full-fledged soap does all that and more. And, yes, soapy does also mean trashy, if only because of the high impropability of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to walk along this road as well. I think Soapy = Melodrama. Megan McTavish is a very melodramatic writer. She's always talking about "raising the emotional stakes" in all her interviews where she's hyping up her sweeps stories. Even in the dialogue, the situations are blown way out of proportion. Several years ago, on AMC, when Di (masquerading as Dixie) left to go to New York to confront the Dragon with Julia, she plainly told everyone that she was leaving via a note. It was no legitimate question as to the fact that she left on her own will -- but after she left, every word out of everyone's mouths was "Dixie is missing." No... she's not missing. She left. Not telling you where she went to doesn't equate to missing -- it equates to she doesn't want your asses to know where she's going.

Or when the truth about Charlotte came out, everyone involved in that storyline kept talking about "Explosions from the Chandler mansion when Adam finds out the truth!"

Soapy, to me, means sensationalized, over hyped, exceedingly melodramatic actions and reactions to rather everyday life things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always seen soapy as one of those words that can be used both positively and negatively. In the negative sensen, it usually means overly dramatic, an emphasis on romantic complications to an extreme degree (i.e. triangles/quadrangles), and plot driven events that defy established character traits. On the positive side, soapy can mean well connected plotlines, a balance of both family and romantic complications, and plots that may be over the top, but are grounded in well defined characters who react as they should to such bizarre events may just be another everyday occurence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
    • Also, someone knocked over the head (usually in the D Mansion) and imprisoned in the secret tunnel room or whatever it was. I swear that must have happened at least a dozen times the last few years, and each time it drove me crazy! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy