Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I think that worked, but not as much by the late '80s, where I think they started getting things wrong with Mack.  I do respect Kevin Dobson, who did well when he was given the material he deserved (like the story with Jason).

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted

40 years ago this week.

Please register in order to view this content

 

  • Members
Posted

Jill’s evolution (or devolution?) is interesting. I didn’t even realize she made a couple innocuous appearances as early as the latter half of Season 6.

I probably need to do a more thorough rewatch because tangled web Peter weaved sometimes left me so confused and still does…like Gary knowing about Jill being Peter’s sister and all the lies but everyone else acted so oblivious.

Obviously the two things that set Jill off the deep end; First was Abby’s threat “The first Mrs Ewing never goes away” and second was seeing Greg use the urn of Peter’s ashes being uses a set decoration/paper weight which she of course stole.

  • Members
Posted

Jill's descent into madness is one of the storylines that made Knots Landing go off the rails in the aftermath of Laura departure. The other two were Charles Scott and Johnny Rourke.

  • Members
Posted

I disagree.

I think Jill going off the rails made perfect sense.  It was a multi season process starting in season 8, climaxing at the season 9 cliffhanger, and continuing into season 10.  

It was after Jill's story ended was when Knots Landing really went off the rails because it happened just as Abby was leaving the show.. and the Lathams didn't really have anything interesting to follow both of these events.

  • Members
Posted

North County Times, 25 December 1983 Devane keeps talent and spirits high

By VERNON SCOTT

If a movie or TV series fails, don't blame the actor. Or should you? Either way, Bill Devane's promising career wound up in the outhouse after two consecutive failures- the $35 million movie bomb, "Honkytonk Freeway," and the disastrous 1981 "From Here to Eternity" TV series. Devane, who had been an up-and-coming leading man, became an instant pariah. The strong-jawed, hawk-nosed actor made a powerful impression on Hollywood, and viewers, with his John F. Kennedy performance in TV's "Missiles of October." He was on his way to apparent stardom. After a half-dozen movies and six TV films, Devane was poised for the jackpot. Then he hit the wall. Paul Newman, Warren Beatty and other established stars even a Tom Selleck may survive two or three consecutive disappointments. Their track records and popularity carry them over. But for a newcomer like Devane, one disaster following on the heels of another can spell the end. It very nearly did for Devane. "

'From Here to Eternity' was Fred Silverman's last hurrah at NBC' he said. "It began as a hit six-hour miniseries and was converted into a weekly hour drama. We only did 12 episodes, and the ratings were terrible. "No matter what anyone says, it hurts an actor to be associated with a failed series because the blame is put on the star. "I got a lot of negative publicity and entered a period of pure purgatory. I became an untouchable. The worst part of it was getting down on myself. It's common enough, I guess. You blame yourself for letting people down. "Word gets out, as if you had a rancid smell about you. People actually avoid you. They don't return your calls. Offers quit coming to your agent.

"Matters got worse with 'Honkytonk Freeway.' It was just a picture that didn't work." Neither did Devane, at least not for a full year. As he puts it, "I was not a hot property." Instead of selling real estate or moving to New York to tackle the theater, Devane sat around waiting for the telephone to ring. It didn't. Then, shaking off the lethargy of despair, Devane did the unthinkable lowered his asking price for movies and TV and let it be known he was available for any acting work at all. "As Jason Robards once told me, 'The secret to acting success is to outlive 'em,'" Devane said, grinning. "And George C. Scott's advice was right, too: 'Don't turn down anything. Actors have to act.' "

In the past year Devane worked for next to nothing in the hit movie, "Testament," currently in release, followed by "Hadley's Rebellion," which will be seen next year. He did the documentary, "Wilderness," for literally nothing. Not a cent. Finally, the producers of "Knots Landing" signed him at a bargain price, hoping to add macho machinations to the weekly soap opera with a guy not quite as sinister as "Dallas' " J.R. Ewing, to be sure, but equally ambitious and ruthless. Devane's spirits, as well as his career, have soared in the past few months. "I joined the series because I wanted to work and I wanted to get paid for it," he said without bitterness.

"I hadn't planned on doing another series, but it was good to join an established show with high ratings rather than to sweat out a new series with the responsibility of having to carry the burden of success or failure. "The character I play is a protagonist who keeps things exciting, a duplicitous, power-hungry political candidate. I play a lot of hot love scenes with Donna Mills, which is all to the good. "And I can't believe the recognition factor. Everywhere I go, people know who I am and want to talk about 'Knots Landing.' I've finally managed to pull out of the doldrums. I'm even getting movie offers for the coming hiatus."

On top of that, Devane can be seen regularly on the tube in Chrysler commercials, which pay him a fortune. Devane's career is back on track. His self-esteem has been restored, and he is looking to a sunny future perhaps even a future where he can make two bombs in a row and remain an employable actor.

*I recall reading the Devane negotiated one of the top salaries to that point when he agreed to do From Here to Eternity as a series. Guess they thought he was vital and he used that to get top dollar. When it flopped,I'm sure there was some bitterness about him getting the $$$ for a failed project.

  • Members
Posted

Testament had a unique financial situation. It was originally intended as an American Playhouse production for PBS, then Paramount decided to release it as a film (and then it did eventually air on PBS before the pay channels). The problem was, the cast didn't get any extra money because of this. So, yeah, I can understand why Devane had his mind on his money and his money on his mind.

  • Members
Posted

After his excellent portrayal of JFK - I remember watching it as a kid and being wicked impressed - Devane must have been in demand for big ticket projects. Sadly, he didn't get very good guidance in choosing the right parts, an often overlooked aspect of the entertainment business....to Knot's Landing's benefit, of course...

  • Members
Posted

It's really shameful how William Devane's career had hit a wall before joining KL, because, IMO, he was almost too good for this show, adding layers to a character that wasn't always written well.

  • Members
Posted

Greg Sumner intro in season 5 as the new villain was the finishing touch on Knots Landing going full-on 1980s primetime soap. William Devane had a commanding presence from his first episode, but I don't think he took over the show. 

 

  • Members
Posted

I'm not sure he really got the roles he deserved after Knots either. He was excellent as Greg, and made you care about him even through some very tacky times. I still think back sometimes to his work when Mary Frances died or when Laura died. 

  • Members
Posted

I think playing Greg Sumner gave his career a huge boost, but it also hindered him a bit because he became too known for that role.  Although he and Judith Light had good comic chemistry on Phenom, and he had a short lived cop show in the late 90s that he was decent in as well.

I think the fact he kept working for twenty + years after Knots Landing ended is almost a miracle considering acting work can be hit or miss. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • John and Marlena may have committed adultery, but they weren't going to be smug creeps about it. "Roman, how do you feel about the name Isabella Titania Brady?"
    • -- It's always amazing to me that these "terrible breakdowns" (by writers so bad they shall not be named) are saved by incredible script writers. Every time 

      Please register in order to view this content

      -- Kat is a "spoilt bitch" while Eva isn't??? -- Does Kat go too far with her mouth? Absolutely. But I get it. Eva has done some terrible things and continues to enable her criminal mother while Kat's family and boyfriend DEFEND her and show her love. -- Eva's complaints about Leslie are meaningless, because they're never backed up with anything. I'll take "spoilt bitch" any day before I take "criminal enabling hoe." -- It's nice that Martin accepts Eva, but the way he's handling it is eye-rolling. Eva gets hugs and smiles and full acceptance while Kat is trashed -- to Eva's face. -- Martin is STILL obsessing over the Kat conversation about sex that Samantha heard. Are you kidding me with this? And now Eva offers to speak to Kat. Yeah, very cute that the sister who screwed the other sister's boyfriend is the one with relationship advice. -- The food at Uptown looked pretty good today. Orphey Gene's food has yet to impress me, and I think it's clear that the country club chef is an alcoholic who cannot control his kitchen.
    • At this point, Marlena, John, and Roman all thought Roman was Belle's father. Sami had switched the initial blood tests. When it was time for another round of tests (because Belle was jaundiced), Sami panicked and kidnapped the baby.  Up until January 1994, Sami was the only one who knew that John was Belle's father. Next up were Stefano and Peter, once Stefano read Sami's diary (he figured it would reveal what was going on between John & Marlena). Stefano revealed the truth of Belle's parentage to Roman AFTER Marlena revealed her tryst with John (about two weeks later, to be exact). Marlena and John were the last ones to find out (during February sweeps, naturally). The John Black name was revived in September 1991.
    • The show has been getting better and better. Dani and Andre solidly "coupling" has been amazing. Genie Francis says soaps don't do couples anymore...maybe Dani/Andre can prove her wrong. To me they are the best couple on the show.  Eva vs Kat is always great. The show continues to find ways to keep it going and I'm all for it. Kat annoys me so bad. She is such a spoiled princess and acts it. I agree the comment about wishing Eva had been aborted was low. If that were the case, then why is she constantly getting in Eva's face? Why doesn't Kat just stay away and ignore her completely like she doesn't exist? I know. I know. It wouldn't be soaping.  This Hayley plot to kill Bill now taking a detour onto Izaiah has me curious. Does Hayley even know what she wants? I can't wait to see the fallout for Hayley and Randy....but not too soon.  I am tired of hearing about Winterfest already though. Can we get to it? lol
    • Great rundown of Long's second stint. Now you got me wondering...and again, thinking how real life impacted the direction of the show. We were talking about how practically the minute Long landed back on GL, she wrecked Ross and Vanessa and threw Alan and Reva together. Soon after, Alan started pursuing Vanessa again (because he was SO afraid of the "real" feelings he was having for Reva for the first time in his life, LOL). It's like she was determined to do an Alan/Vanessa/Somebody triangle at some point. She started one with Billy as the third side (well, actually, Alan was the third side) back in late 83/early 84 before Bernau exited GL the first time. So she had to drop it. But since Billy was gone this time, she seemed to decide, hey, I'll do it, only with Reva as the missing side of the triangle. Then Maeve left, messing that up! So I wonder, would she have had Alan and Vanessa marry? Maybe not, but I doubt Vanessa would have taken kindly to being overthrown for Reva. Could have been done in a really humiliating way, like after the invitations went out or even at the wedding. Maybe she would have helped Phillip with his plot to dethrone Alan. Lots of interesting possiblities.  I did like the way this story was handled. Chelsea was clearly more in love with Phillip than he was with her. Even "dead," no one could compete with Beth. So it was always doomed, but they showed how Phillip lost his way because he was obsessed with getting back at his dad. I also thought the relationship between Alan and Chelsea was a little...strange. He was very much in favor of their relationship, even though she came from an even lower background than Beth's. She also always fiercely defended Alan. Which has made me wonder if--ick--one of the many writing teams was thinking about putting them together romantically. (Of course, in my headcanon, where Alan has a youthful romance with the never seen Reardon sister, his fondness for Chelsea then makes perfect sense.) I always wondered why they never thought of putting Chelsea with Rick, especially after they butted heads over the death of her fiance. Seemed like a no-brainer.
    • Aubrey's Marina was great...but they wasted her...she could have been a new Nola (since she was living in the BH I would have had her find the N.R. + K.N. thing Nola carved in her bedroom...."I don't know who this girl was but she seems to be as unhappy as I am stuck here.") And have her set her cap for a good recast Shayne and take on the Old Bag Reva when she tries to interfere.."Oh please, I heard she was back in Oklahamo giving blow jobs behind the gas station, and she acts like she is Mother of the Year...God I hate her."  When they recast with that boring Kit girl and then...cutesy Mandy it was done. I love the idea of Billy and Van bonding over hell on wheels Peter. and kicking **** to the curb.Billy went to prison to protect him from Roger but that was never mentioned when Billy returned. Peter and Aubrey's Marina would raise Hell together..do a Nolaredux  in that he bangs her, she gets preggers, passes that off as Shayne's with Ole Bag Reva suspicious...I could see Marina ringing a bell to get the Ole Bag to bring her some ice cream...."But Grandma...oh you hate that I am sorry, okay, Grammy, you know I can't be stressed and oh, Shayne would be mad if I lost the baby..."ah what could have been.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Yeah, that's I mentioned the christening, when the truth comes out Reading October and November 1993, what is actually nuts is how much story they went through in a month. Because John's not even interested in Marlena at the time of Belle's birth.  He is rebound lusting for Kristen, who delivered Belle (funny mention in SOD about Marlena being unable to service at the Horton cabin on her "cellular" phone, I assume there was heightened vigilance to the exposition covering the tech of the time).   And, of course, since it was Kristen helping Marlena give birth during a stormy night, they both looked glossy, windswept, and gorgeous.    Justice for Jamie, I bet she's still holding Sami's secrets wherever she is.
    • You know what's crazy? Even though JFP ultimately has been a disaster at many soaps, and even though all the negatives about her are true, I'd still prefer her over Josh Griffith at Y&R. She can take over for him anytime, and I will applaud.
    • The baby was named when Roman was believed to be her father.
    • I gotta agree with Sami on this one. -- thanks @Franko for the source, that's a good find. I mean, not enough to sell the kid on the black market (pun intended) but.. At least it wasn't John who suggested it, that makes it cleaner.  Roman had naming rights until the christening cleared up the paternity.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy