Jump to content

Carolyn Hinsey Fired!


Recommended Posts

  • Webmaster

The soaps of today are comedies in comparison to the drama's they are supposed to be. S&P doesn't meddle with primetime as it does with Daytime due to the fallout of the FCC and the PCA complaining about bare skin. If Daytime soaps exclusively aired at night after 11pm, we might have a chance of getting the action and adventure we crave, but unfortunatley, as you said...we are stuck in the 1950's where mother's were housewives stuck in the kitchen and watched their daily soaps while preparing for their children to come home from school. The mere thought of sex on TV was unthinkinable.

All the talk of GH being a Sopranos type show is B.S. because you never see anything REALLY happen on this show. The days of Brenda getting shot in the shower, Lily's car blowing up or the Puerto Rico remote with boats and gun-fire? That was a Sopranos type show. Not this crap we're getting today.

Soaps need to bring that drama to the screen and not keep it behind the scenes as we've been learning as of late. The more dramatic the story, the more people will tune in. Until they transfer all that to the screen, people will live their own dramatic lives and forger there was a thing call a soap on the air.

In fact, when I talk soaps to others they look down on me...but if this were the 1980's or the early 1990's? They'd be so there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

*depressed*

And even more depressed because soaps were pushing the envelope somewhat once upon a time -- before Boobgate.

And, yes, I know what you mean about soaps. It's a habit a tend to keep on the down-low now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Webmaster

I will say this...if there is one thing we have learned about Carolyn being "fired," it is that no one person is unstoppable in this genre. There will come a point where one of these people in charge will lose their jobs and we hope that when that happens, whatever change that comes about because of it is for the better, not the worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How many people, like me, had complaints about Angela Shapiro & the direction she seemed to be allowing the ABC soaps to go and now would give anything to have her back instead of Frons?

'Be careful what you wish for' has become twisted up with trying to remember that it can always get worse, even when you think that's unthinkable & every instance of frying pan & fire comparisons! Soaps keep trending downward in so many ways. They also have been doing so for so long. But, now, it moves so fast toward nowhere lower to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Donna B @ Aug 11 2008, 04:28 PM)
How many people, like me, had complaints about Angela Shapiro & the direction she seemed to be allowing the ABC soaps to go and now would give anything to have her back instead of Frons?

'Be careful what you wish for' has become twisted up with trying to remember that it can always get worse, even when you think that's unthinkable & every instance of frying pan & fire comparisons! Soaps keep trending downward in so many ways. They also have been doing so for so long. But, now, it moves so fast toward nowhere lower to go.

Ugh. I rely on you for optimism :). But of course, what you say is absolutely right. Even when some people seem to be "saviors" at the start, the genre is left worse off by the end of their reign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, good things came out of that beginning. I watched Y&R for 2 years, I think it was. The last time I had watched it was about 6 months of Jack Smith's tenure with the entirely misogynistic 'was it or wasn't it' rape storyline, where it clearly was rape. And, before that, I had watched another 6 months when Kay Alden had the real greenlight to do it herself. And, before that, off & on throughout the years. But, when all is said & done, Y&R came closest to grabbing me as a continuing regular viewer at the beginning of the Latham tenure. Of course, then, I became bored with what she was doing, or having done, and took it off TiVo. A boring soap is the worst sin to me.

Sorry to wander off away from Hinsey, ... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Somebody on Jossip essentially wrote an open letter to the soap stars who are undoubtedly reading the thread, especially with regards to rumors about sexuality. Something along the lines of "The vast majority of the soap audience is a lot more sophisticated than the drooling yokels you might take us for." ITA with that assertion.

That was me. I really think that the public is far more accepting than given credit and its about time. For God's sake this is ACTING. You don't expect the "doctor" on the screen to BE a doctor so why does the person in the love story HAVE to be Het? I am part of the fandoms of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (that gave a lovely love story with Willow and Tara), Dr. Who (that introduced the "omnisexual" character of Cpt. Jack played by the very out and proud John Barrowman now of Torchwood). If you saw the reactions of the fans to Mr. Barrowman and/or these characters you would not think viewers unable to process and accept.

On that thread at Jossip I am most interested in the behind the scenes manipulations that have seemingly contributed to trouble on OUR favorite shows. The "outing" sidetrack only takes from that but I can see how some actors might be nervous at the happenings on that thread there. It is up to 1111 posts already with no signs of an end and the carnage is amazing....mostly regarding the three "queen's of mean" at SOW and SOD as it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

QUOTE (Donna B @ Aug 11 2008, 05:59 PM)
But, good things came out of that beginning. I watched Y&R for 2 years, I think it was. The last time I had watched it was about 6 months of Jack Smith's tenure with the entirely misogynistic 'was it or wasn't it' rape storyline, where it clearly was rape. And, before that, I had watched another 6 months when Kay Alden had the real greenlight to do it herself. And, before that, off & on throughout the years. But, when all is said & done, Y&R came closest to grabbing me as a continuing regular viewer at the beginning of the Latham tenure. Of course, then, I became bored with what she was doing, or having done, and took it off TiVo. A boring soap is the worst sin to me.

Sorry to wander off away from Hinsey, ... ;)

I thought Latham was the second coming! And I still defend the early part of her regime. But DonnaB tells it like it was for me too....the show became unfollowable (I wouldn't personally say boring)...the good she contributed was soon squandered.

But back to the Hinsey thread at Jossip. My goodness...now Frank Tobin!!! What is shocking to me is the now radio-silence from the SOD/SOW staff. They must have received some kind of cease and desist with a thread to follow their cyber-trails, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, about Y&R, I didn't have as much overall invested in it as I had never been a long-term regular fan, so our differences in terms for the end of the Latham good time might be accounted for there.

And, about SOD/SPW silence, ... I don't find it at all unusual. I find it to be regular, normal, SOP. I hope they were able to get some work done today. These are driving jobs with weekly deadlines where people are constantly working on things far down the line as well as working on the 'more last-minute' things. SOD goes to press Wednesday afternoon or evening. SPW, Thursday. Besides, what kind of response do you imagine? A reply to the hullabaloo up on their website? Or what?

I don't follow who you're thinking of with your 'cease & desist' comment, though. Do you mean you are surprised that Jossip hasn't been served such by Source Interlink's Legal Department? Or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
    • Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect! Oh I've seem this! That's part of why I'm curious! The show could put EastEnders to shame on the gangster Aspect!
    • Eve was one of those characters that had the "Jessie Brewer"role. They had heavy storyline, they burned through it and now they are there for support and a touchstone in the community (Marland wanted to give Jessie story, but I agree with Monty...she best served in her connecting role, and keeping that damn Amy Vining busy so she keeps her nose out of things) So charcters are important and why they should have kept characters like Bridget around (even as she is more volatiles then Eve) who didnt need a big storyline but could have been behind the bar making connections and expostion, but Rauch wanted JEVA/JEVA/JEVA and DRAMA (which to him meant a lot of yelling and stupidity.)
    • Why do I feel like (or remember possible

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Mark Dante operated on Jeff? Also, I was under the impression that Jeff shot himself accidentally. In his drunken stupor he saw Rick and Monica together and he thought hevwas shooting at them.
    • A number of errors in the above article. You wonder how with all that research,how  they slipped through. I think they are conflating Women Alone with Lonely Women. I have never read anything of a serial called Women Alone. However,I am prepared to be proven wrong.   It seems Irna actually WAS interested in TV soaps as witnessed by These Are My Children airing in 1949 on NBC in the early days of TV.   I don't believe that was reluctance, rather simply good business sense as radio's dominance began to wane.   Inferring that was somehow connected to Irna who was off that show 10 years prior.   Again inferring that Phillips leaving 6 years prior had some connection to the eventual cancellation.     Again these two events are in fact one. Irna left ATWT only once in 1970 and returned in 72. She was not working on another P&G show at the time. So either she brought the ratings up or they dipped, depending on which above account you believe   Untrue. A World Apart debuted 5 years after she left AW. And AWA aired longer than a few months. Over a year in fact.   I believe Orin Tovrov was the writer. Irna was not involved in the creation of this show. And no mention of Masquerade an Irna serial  which was on air around this time.   TBD finished in 1962. As we see over and over, these inaccuracies are published and accepted as fact.
    • YES! While I objectively found the writing on RH (particularly during its first few years and then again in its final days) to be excellent, so many of the principle characters were unpleasant, and totally turned me off. I could never settle down and become emotionally involved with a group of people who grated on my nerves.
    • Ugh now we get a Emmerdale and Corrie crossover soon. ugh.. How desperate 
    • This show is definitely not one to deserve the axe.  especially the New Year’s Eve episode was crazy wild! there is a place where u can download nearly all episodes from October 2019 til today. But they don’t accept new people. https://youtu.be/aD-IXEJjymU?si=19wtpwthSNYOe-4y   this is from this years winter break when the returned. I loved it
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy