Jump to content

The Doctors


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Oh yes! I have a quote from afterward, a nameless NBC programmer, not Fred but someone who worked for him, that says in essence that they went with the idea of a 90 minute show because they couldn't think of anything better to do at the time. OY! 

@Paul Raven P&G when they stopped wiping I have seen it expressed as 1979-80. And then you list the 5 shows I believe they continue to have warehoused. 

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

"After exhaustive research and discussions with the Colgate team, it could only be determined that those tapes were reused by NBC back in the day and thus, the beloved final two years of The Doctors no longer exist."  

Pfffftt.  Let's rephrase that.  "After exhaustive research and discussions with the Colgate team, it could only be determined that those tapes do NOT belong to Colgate-Palmolive, and we do NOT have the funds to enter into into negotiations with NBC to purchase the rights to air them."  

I expect those tapes will "miraculously reappear" if NBC decides there's money to be made in digging them out of their own storage facility and digitizing them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watching some of the interviews by the lovely Bobbie Wygant, there are at least four different occasions where she starts off an interview with Kathleen Turner by saying when they first met (for Body Heat), Kathleen was only known for The Doctors (that interview doesn't seem to be on the channel as of yet). This is probably the most positive of Kathleen's reactions to this anecdote (in that she even remembers her character name) - also one of the interviews where she doesn't seem quite as...out of it. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frank Telfer (Luke Dancy),Regis Philbin (Himself) and Jane Badler (Natalie Bell).
NBC Press photo & release for the March 19,1982 episode:
Regis Philbin (then hosting a short lived daytime talk show at NBC),made a guest appearance as himself on The Doctors for the grand opening of a remodeled "Medicine Man"
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/FRANK-TELFER-REGIS-PHILBIN-JANE-BADLER-SOAP-THE-DOCTORS-TV-Orig-7X9-Press-Photo/402506901966?hash=item5db747e9ce:g:XG8AAOSwYZBfkLd5

 

HIQ0tPJ.jpg

 

Posted on FB by Chuck Snitchler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@robbwolff  You were right about where you saw it so your brain is doing A-okay! It is now documented. Thanks! 

(During 1978-79) "NBC was the only network to cancel a soap, "For Richer, For Poorer," and it expanded one of its hour-long daytime dramas to 90 minutes. It appears the expansion of "Another World," hasn't set a trend. CBS and ABC aren't planning to convert any of their current soaps to 90-minute marathons. The NBC experiment was looked upon as a failure by the two competing networks and they could be right. "Another World" wasn't leading its time period in the ratings as an hour show, so the move to 90 minutes was implemented with the hope of building an audience that would stay for the whole hour and a half. It did not work out that way. In any event, NBC has been toying with the idea of turning "Days of our Lives" into a 90-minute entry." 

Steven H. Scheuer. (1979). Daytime Programs. TV: The Television Annual 1978-79. Collier Macmillan Publishers. p. 124.

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
more info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

lol.  Several years ago, they made a BIG production of "we're going to begin airing episodes from 1967 when the show went from black & white to COLOR!!"  

I suppose that sounded better than the truth:  "NBC owned the show from 1963 to 1967, so we don't have the rights to air a blooming one of those pre-1967 episodes.  Sorry, folks!" 

And now they come along with this song & dance about 1981 & 1982, for the same fairly obvious reason.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But didn't Colgate -Palmolive own the show from the debut? i think so. Retro did show the first episode/a b&w ep  didn't they at some point?

Don't know about the later episodes claims that NBC trashed them but it made sense to start the show from the color eps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The way I've always heard it, NBC owned it from 1963 until 1967, with Colgate-Palmolive as the primary sponsor.  In 1967, Channelex (which was CP's little version of "P&G Productions") purchased it from NBC, produced it and distributed it to NBC until fall of 1980, and then threw it back to NBC.  

Here's a newspaper blurb indicating that's the case.  (They're discussing Hugh McPhillps who was the casting director of the show.)  This is from 1974.   "McPhillips, whose main job with The Doctors is handling the casting of each of the 250 half-hour episodes taped every year, has been with the soap since the mid-1960s.  A director for 17 years at NBC, who introduced the program, McPhillips left the television network when The Doctors was purchased outright in 1967 by Colgate.  He is employed now by Channelex, Inc."  

 

Edited by Broderick
Add source
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Welcome.  I don't know enough about it to be "staunch" (as Little Edie would say), but I just figured from Day One any distribution package Colgate-Palmolive assembled for Retro-TV would be 1967-1980, with possibly a few outlier episodes here and there from the public domain.  The rest would be NBC's little red wagon to sell, and Retro wouldn't be getting it easily.     

Retro never seemed very certain (or very forthcoming) about what they'd acquired from Colgate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Pre-Covid, they did say the pre-67 episodes would be app exclusives. I imagine they must know what they have by now from that era. I do wonder if they’ll go back to their original promise and upload that stuff. Even if they just had scattered episodes available, it would be a nice thing to upload considering. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's very interesting! I guess a parallel would be the game show Concentration, owned by NBC but produced by Goodson-Todman from 1973-1978 and 1987-1991. Those tapes exist, but couldn't be aired without working out a deal with NBC. The Buzzr channel finally did it, airing the 87-91 shows beginning in 2018; the 73-78 shows starting in 2020. The 70s shows were taken off in 2022, while Buzzr is on track to air all the 87-91 shows. Maybe the 70s shows weren't getting the ratings to justify the licensing cost, so back in the vault they go?

Assuming Retro does need to pay NBC something to air 1963-1967 and 1980-1982, perhaps they set up the pay site hoping to generate enough revenue to do that? When they realized it was a pipe dream, they'd never make enough money to do it, there wasn't enough interest, they made the site free and said the rest of the episodes are missing? Again, it's an interesting theory!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The eternal dream...him begging to get with her included. 
    • On the other hand, I still find episodes of TV with people smoking in front of babies shocks me into nervous giggles.
    • Word of advice... you have to view the show without the 2025 lenses.. which means you need to 86 the misandry.
    • i love reading other posters alternate takes and scenarios. Yours would have really upped the tension.
    • Amanda is not my cup of tea. That's all I'm gonna say. She's repetitive and childish. She acts like a brat with her parents and has this constant "I'm not satisfied or happy" look on her face. The actress is okay in my opinion. I'm not impressed by anything I've seen her do so far. But she's okay.  BUT Amanda's repetitive scenes with Sam are the ones that I want to fast-forward the most. They just have 2  topics they like to talk about... and it's always "You are infringing on my right to be a powerful career woman! I need to be outside dating men for a job, so I can WORK and prove I'M NOT A RICH GIRL ONLY!" and he's like "You and your family are buying me a career and I don't want it! I WANT TO BE ABLE TO STRUGGLE and be poor and you guys ARE denying me the opportunity by giving it all on a silver platter" This is their main storyline for me... and it's just annoying when it's the same every single episode. It's a fake struggle that I don't buy. These people are so spoiled by this point and have everything... don't make me suffer listening to them bicker how amazing their life is, so they are unhappy about that. Just a personal view. I'm not saying THIS IS the situation. My view is also restricted, since I'm only 4-5 months into the episodes. 
    • It's shocking to see Steffy look down on anyone. She was the new generation HO for years. I mean... she was nasty and using sex to seduce married-engaged-in-relationship-men all the time. She was embracing it fully. Bradley was accenting on the fact that Taylor's daughter had become Brooke 2. I remember how disgusting it was when she was using Hope's virginity to her advantage and offering to f-ck the guys that wanted Hope. It was ABSURDLY nasty.  Then couple of years ago Bradley decided we should forget about it and made Steffy BECOME her grandmother. IN AN INSTANT. There was no build up to it. Which aged the f-ck out the character and made her unbearable. Because it's one thing to see an actual matriarch, older woman doing these things, being a moral judge... but it's complete joke to see the ex-ho acting like this. Ex-ho that is still incredibly young and has no right acting like she is better that anyone or... a moral JUDGE. Steffy and Hope's personalities got swapped!!! That's the irony of it. So any time these gang-style of fans come attacking Hope... for acting like a "slut"... I pinch myself - their HEROINE Steffy was doing this HARCORE. Are these people oblivious or just pretending not to remember. How can you stan a moral judge... that attacks "sluts" and also stan the same type of behavior you are attacking... years ago. How does this happen. But I repeat myself at this point.  I agree with everything you said 100000 percent. It's the truth. At least in my eyes. 
    • The Amanda pregnancy was a blunder. Amanda and Sam were AW's best bet for a starcrossed supercouple. Young love destined to be turn apart by outside forces and misunderstandings . Battling for years to finally get together. Instead AW had them married and pregnant within a year.  
    • It is his fatal flaw.  He's smart, cute, and loyal.  But, a total chauvinist pig.  We're looking through a 2025 lens, but April's from a wealthy family, (that she recently met), she should be allowed to contribute to her own home. Especially if Draper is going to work for the Crime Commission, rather than joining Mike's private law firm (did I get that part correct?) How about smoking while the baby is in the room?  It all looks nuts by current standards. Raven was married to Geraldine's son Kevin, but had an affair with Logan (whom Geraldine also considered like a son). Raven got pregnant by Logan, then Kevin died (long story short).  The part you need to know is that Raven was bored being a mother to Jamey (check out my member name).  So, she starts going out to Elliott's club and leaving Jamey with April.  Logan is not happy that Raven keeps leaving their baby all around town.  And thus, Geraldine is not pleased with Raven either. Draper and Logan are frequently rivals in the courtroom.  FYI --- Draper is also Raven's step-brother (her mother married his father). Raven's real name is Charlotte. But, one day [she] was sitting on the lawn and saw this beautiful black bird with shiny wings fly by. [She] wanted to be that bird. So beautiful. So free. With beautiful black wings…"    @chrisml you'll hear that story soon, and I envy you getting to see it the first time.
    • There is a time... till the old storyline is cleaning up... where it's still kinda annoying. For me it was. That's a personal opinion. But in 10-20 episodes more... you'll find yourself enthralled. It's not even begun. I'm so glad to hear your reviews! And excited of what's to come for you! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy