Jump to content

EastEnders: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Hah, it was a prediction, Ben-based on the knowledge that he came very close to joining the show on at least one occasion. I don't know if DTC or casting goes on these boards-maybe my posts gave them ideas? I do think Nicholas really was an obvious choice for the role, though. If he is indeed playing Sharon's father, too, the physical resemblance between them will be quite wonderful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can say tonight’s episode was well-written, and well-acted (and reminds me again that Matt di Angelo can play the material when it’s there for him), but the basic core of this story just disgusts me and seems to be collapsing further into a pool of its own sick.

I had no idea where they were going with Shirley’s past memories with Buster. All the talk of giving herself to drunken men…Buster going on about how perfect she was when he first saw her at 13. Apparently some other fans were as disturbed by this scene as I was (frankly, it sounded like grooming), and other fans replied that Buster and Shirley are around the same age, so that wasn’t how it was intended. It is almost like a parody at this point - more angst and pain for Shirley, more and more, in lieu of character development or direction.

Now we seem to have the same for Dean. Pain and woe and angst, and yes, there are hints he will eventually be found out for what he did to Linda, but it’s all months too late. Nor do I believe it was meant to be stretched out this long for some type of “realism” - I think they stretched it out this long because they erroneously believed it was good fodder for the anniversary (the whole “Is Dean dead?”) and created a story that damaged a wide swathe of characters. This seems like their belated attempt to add some depth to the character and material, and to tie him into other isolated, poorly drawn stories. The sad part is he and Roxy actually have a great deal of chemistry (far more than she’s had with Charlie), but who is going to ever want to see him in a relationship?

What I dislike most about this story is the repeated statement that Roya has CF because of “punishment” to poor poor Shirley and poor poor Dean. For a soap that is patting itself on the back for realism and being praised by a charity, this is a horrendous, offensive, shallow way to treat a serious condition. The idea that children are magically punished with a debilitating illness so that their parent or grandparent can have an extended pity party is heinous for their many sins (sins that they never really feel that bad about - not when it counts) it’s cheap, and it makes me feel dirty even watching this show.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get where you're coming from Carl, but I think it's realistic for some parents to feel that way when their kid (or whomever) gets a life changing disease; they automatically go into pity-party mode, blaming themselves, saying it's a punishment, why me, etc, etc. I think it makes sense for Dean to feel that way, as he's beginning to consciously acknowledge what he did to Linda. And, Shirley always victimises herself, anyway, so nothing new here. But, what this kind of writing needs is for someone to say that's a load of bullcrap, and slap them back to reality. Sadly, other characters usually indulge them in this line of thinking, b/c it's tragic and emotional.

I wasn't completely paying attention to those scenes, but I do think Shirley and Buster as supposed to be the same age. I just can't take any more Shirley pity-parties. I get it: Shirley's had an awful life, the worst anyone could ever have - like, ever. Now, give her some development before she reaches 80!

Watching those scenes of Roxy and Dean reminded me of the time they briefly included Lola in this story. I felt like Roxy was in the role that was originally intended for Lola, but they realised Roxy had nothing to do so threw her in with Dean.

It's a damn shame DTC ever thought the rape story was a good idea. Dean could have been a great character, one that could have lasted many years on the show, but due to the ill-conceived rape plot, it means he has an expiry date. Matt said he was originally contracted to the end of the rape story, but they asked him to re-sign for the Roya story, and that the rape story will resume at some point. I think it all sounds a like a bit of mess, and ill-thought out. At this point, they can't really make Dean a viable character for the long-term, as right now I'm struggling to have any feelings for Dean at all - I can't revel in his misery, and I can't sympathise with him, either. Home and Away is the only other soap (outside of US soaps) to keep a rapist on for many years and make him one half of a popular couple. But that story wasn't without its detractors, and was in fact very controversial. I don't think EE could pull that off with Dean and survive the backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i though Matt D was horrible in last night's episode. He's got all the bad actor habits. There's that particular bad actor habit of constantly standing outside of himself watching himself act rather than ever being directly in the moment, something that Linda Henry, Karl Howman and Lindsay Coulson are quite capable of. He's awful. Not awful to the point of being embarrassing like the guy who plays Les Coker but awful in a painfully predictable, low on energy, dull sort of way.

Speaking of bad actors someone should sit Samantha Womack down and tell her that taking simple sentences and putting a question mark at the end of them is super annoying. She was enormously guilty of that last night.

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not much of a fan as I think he's often wooden, but I did think he was very good last night. I think the episode would have been even worse otherwise, because those scenes were so melodramatic. The one with Buster and Dean I thought was particularly well-acted. He wasn't as good on his own or with the always mediocre Rita Symons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nice scenes with Martin and Stacy tonight. But Sonia and Carol are morons for not figuring out what was going on in their own home.

Roxy said to Dean tonight "Shut up and get naked." And in a post-coital scene there was a lingering shot of him without his shirt on. Great, let's make a sex object out of the rapist.

Buster is definitely growing on me. He had one particular line "When I was in the nick I did anything to pass the time. Well...ALMOST anything." Methinks Buster was telling a porky pie. He's spent most of his adult life in prison, hasn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Roxy and Dean had sex?

Roxy is such a trollop. I really wish they'd do more with the character then having her be the Square's top whore. I swear she's had the same story every years since her inception.

And once again, I hate that they made Dean into a rapist. I truly do. I just wish they would've brought Chelsea back for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not once but on two separate occasions now.

I understand Roxy being drunk out of her skull and making a bad choice by bedding down with Dean. Sort of. But then a day or so later she not only summons him back for seconds she begins the session with "Shut up and get naked"? Did she not get the memo that he's a rapist? I guess she doesn't believe Linda. Hmmm. I can envision a scenario where they're in the middle of the act, he cracks up for some reason, calls her "Linda" and rapes her. God help Roxy.

Edited by TimWil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's with him now because Ronnie questioned her. She's a brat who is lashing out at her sister. That boring flop Charlie shaming her just exacerbated it.

I know some think him raping her or confessing to the rape will be caught on Ronnie's webcam.

Personally I'd rather they just have Dean leave town and never have any of the story mentioned again. Yes, "justice" is important, but none of it will be about Linda anyway, it will be Shirley tears and Mick looking constipated. Who gives a [!@#$%^&*]?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to laugh when some fans keep going on about how "realistic" this story with Dean is and that's why he's still around - so this story can have a "realistic" conclusion. So realistic that they make sure we get all kinds of beefcake shots. The directors know what some people want to see, and they give it.

I'm still having a hard time with this Martin. I find something very unsettling about him - to be honest a part of me keeps expecting to learn he's secretly a killer or a psychopath. He has all these slightly offcenter stares at Stacey. He and Lacey Turner also have no chemistry, which makes their inevitable love story (and the obvious kicker that he's good for her and she doesn't realize it) more difficult for me to buy. It's a shame, because I should have enjoyed him talking about his childhood, but instead I just kept thinking what fat arms he had.

My eyes went back in my head at Vincent being a chessmaster to show us what a brilliant mind he has. Daran Little is a little too clever a writer for his own good. Anyway, I do think Karl Howman's doing a good job as Buster - I think he could be a good long-term character if they so choose. He doesn't stick out the way many of this type, like Eddie Moon, did.

Sonia just gets on my nerves. So sour and such a know-it-all. And Tina doesn't fit into that family at all. She feels like she wandered off the Corrie set.

The shot of Cindy under the bed, caught out, was a great cliffhanger...if only she'd been a Carter, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree about Martin and Stacey having zero chemistry. I don't think she has any with Kush, either. They should introduce an older, powerful male character she was involved with when she was away from Walford.

Even if there wasn't the Rapist Factor I'd still think Roxy and Dean didn't have any chemistry. I see lot of chemistry between her and Vincent, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Oh, I know it was. I was just talking about how it's not giving me parallels to Caroline dying. It's really as far from it as possible.  But about the foreshadowing - Hahahhahah. Yes. And you missed one - Liam googling - "what is cancer"... on google. 
    • GH 2-17-21 Denise Alexander's last appearance https://www.instagram.com/p/DJdjXgwJ1Ez/
    • @Maxim This Liam dying out of the blue was crafted in a hurry for three reasons: 1. To facilitate JMW's leave 2. To prop Steffy - 'Oh, Steffy has so much grace and moral superiority that she ignored everything that swine HoLo did to tell her for the sake of their daughters. Queen Stephanie would be so proud of her!' 3. Distracting Steffy enough to give Lunacy an easy way to slither into Finn's life. Once Luna discovers that Lame is dying, she'll play that card: 'Dad, life is too short and precious!' If this was an intentional story, we would've had the typical B&B foreshadowing - Liam faceplanting into a bowl of pasta, Lame missing meetings, being forgetful. Instead, Lame does an impulsive quick quit and $B doesn't even care enough to make a single attempt to get him back? Please.   
    • https://www.tvinsider.com/1180503/denise-alexander-dead-general-hospital-lesley-webber/ Alexander made her soap opera debut as Lois Adams on The Clear Horizon in 1960, but her big break came in 1966 when she was cast as Susan Hunter Martin on Days of Our Lives while still attending college at UCLA. As Susan, Alexander played a host of dramatic tales, including murdering her husband David Martin (played by Clive Clerk) in May 1967 after the death of their son. “She started out as the bad girl and was thrown out of boarding school for smoking and drinking,” recalled Alexander to We Love Soaps TV. “The character caught on and sparked something with the audience, and that is how Susan became an important part of the show. I was there for almost seven years…. I had such a wonderful time on Days. It was like going to camp every day for me. I loved the people, loved the show, and loved what I got to do. They loved the character and liked me as an actor and gave me lots of neat stuff to do. I didn’t even ask for a vacation for five years because if I worked 365 days a year, I thought I was great. It was a very good time in my life.” In 1973, Alexander was in contract negotiations with Days when ABC offered significant perks to the actress to join General Hospital to play Dr. Lesley Williams. Though Alexander loved her time in Salem, she decided to leave. “It was [Days’ Executive Producer] Betty Corday who sent me to General Hospital,” Alexander told welovesoaps.net. “She said, ‘You must do this.’ So when I went to General Hospital..."

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Now that GL and LOL synopses are being added I'd welcome requests for specific soaps from 1976.
    • By 78 NBC daytime was struggling. They knew what the issues were but failed to make the changes needed to get those young gals watching.  Jan 78 Plans for NBC's daytime programs - which are in third place -are apparently less well defined at the moment. Michael Brockman, a former daytime programer at ABC, took the position of vice president in charge of daytime for NBC just a few weeks ago. He and his chief assistant, Mary Alice Dwyer (an associate of Mr. Brockman at ABC), are in the process of analyzing the network's schedule to determine where to begin making changes. One thing Mr. Brockman knows, he said, is that NBC needs more women18 -49 (NBC is currently last in that category in daytime). "Whatever you design," he said, "has to fundamentally appeal to that demographic." He indicated, however, that he is less concerned with the network's afternoon serial block than he is with its morning game show and rerun mix, and, like his counterparts at the other networks, Mr. Brockman discounts the notion that recent drops in daytime viewership may be attributable to the one -hour serial form. The first changes were indeed in the morning. In April 78 Card Sharks replaced Sanford and Son reruns at 10am and High Rollers was introduced at 11am knocking Wheel of Fortune back to 11.30 replacing Knockout. Sanford and Son moved to noon replacing To Say the Least. On paper that looked like a stronger schedule. The next move in July was the disastrous America Alive at noon, replacing Sanford and The Gong Show,which set them back even further. Finally in October 78, Jeopardy was brought back at 10.30 and Hollywood Squares moved to 1pm replacing another flop For Richer for Poorer. The only major change for the soaps apart from cancelling FRFP, was Linda Grover as headwriter for The Doctors as of April 78.
    • Yeah, Ben and Evie don't start interacting in a 'we're going to pair them together as a couple' way until Feb/March 1977 when she recommends Ben paint a portrait for Jackie.  And Evie's working for Jackie so she and Ben interact and start to become friends.  That happens after Tim breaks up with  her and she's forgiven her sister.. and he and Hope break up after he covers for his younger brother for a crime that he had committed.  Jackie does come onto the canvas in December 1976 and the first months are her trying to snag Mike while she and Justin seem to play a cat and mouse game with one another as he's trying to restart things with Sara again. I often wonder if the Phillip story only came about because the show was going to be expanded to an hour.. and the Dobson's deciding that some of the new characters they were introducing could be tied to Justin/Jackie's back story.
    • Seems like the Dobsons were aiming for a Joe/Sara/Justin triangle or, having decided that Joe would be killed off, Justin would be waiting in the wings. But that never came to pass and I don't think there was much reference to Justin/Sara as time went on.That was something that could have been used later on but Doug Marland may not have known or cared. Also, when the show went to an hour they could add a lot of characters and not rely on the stalwarts, hence Jackie/Alan/Elizabeth. And after Leslie died, Mike went into Dad mode with Hope. Hope/Ben never took off and Hope was replaced and then dropped and Ben moved on to Eve, whose romance with Tim fizzled and Jordan Clarke left (by choice?)
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Would anyone have any of these Y&R episodes they could add to the vault? It would be very much appreciated. November 11, 1987 February 16, 1989 February 17, 1989 February 1991 episode - Brad vs Paul fight April 10, 1992 November 16, 1992 November 17, 1992 November 23-27, 1992 July 11, 1993 October 5, 1993 June 17, 1994  - english version June 29, 1994 September 15, 1994 May 16, 1995 August 4, 1995 October 27, 1995 March 11, 1996 April 8, 1996 September 6, 1996 November 26, 1996 January 3, 1997 January 27, 1997 February 17, 1997 February 18, 1997 March 5, 1997 April 22, 1997 June 16, 1997 September 23, 1997 September 24, 1997 September 25, 1997 December 11, 1998 January 12, 2000 September 27, 2000 March 5, 2001 March 6, 2001 March 8, 2001 - english version March 19, 2001 April 5, 2001 April 6, 2001 October 7, 2002 January 30, 2004 August 23, 2004 August 24, 2004 June 15, 2004 June 21, 2004 November 8, 2004                                          
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy