Jump to content

Hollyoaks: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

It is pretty smart, but I think with the show's ratings needs they may be better off leaking some stories, if they think those stories will get attention.

Kirkwood basically gave away most of what was going to happen in the first half of 2008 and it didn't hurt ratings any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Carmel/Mercedes scenes in the E4 episode were fab.

Carmel: Why the hell am I comforting you?

Mercedes: Because that's what you do, Carmel. That's what you do.

The scene where Jem (I wish she would go away) realized Gilly still loved Steph was also good. Anthony Quinlan can be a good actor when he has the chance.

I wonder if they are going to be breaking up Malachy and Mercedes for good.

Is it wrong that I just can't stand Cheryl even if she's in the right? She's so judgmental.

Edited by CarlD2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't get that Carl. I haven't seen today's ep yet, so this may not be what you're talking about, but how is Cheryl in the right to tell Carmel about Mercy and Calvin's business? Yesterday's episode she just wouldn't shut the [!@#$%^&*] up with her constant nagging and playing the victim. Nothing happened to you, ugly cow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it just me, or did Archie get chunky?

NANCY! I love you, always have, always will. The end.

Loved the Carmel/Mercedes scenes. Such soapy goodness.

Marquess should have taken this story opportunity with Jem to write her out for good. After realizing Gilly loves Steph, she decides to go on their trip alone, and never comes back. Simple. Though, I've never really cared about Gilly and the only reason I ever put up with him was because of my love for Rhys.

So does Steph actually love Gilly too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy