Jump to content

ATWT: Van and Jake issue statement about GLAAD controversy.


Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://www.afterelton.com/node/15002

I contacted the actors' representatives who gave AfterElton.com the following statement:

We were honored to have been asked to appear at the GLAAD Media Awards on Monday night. As actors, it is such a privilege to be part of this important evening. It was our choice not to kiss each other on the red carpet. While we love and support the characters we play, we attended the Award show as actors, not characters.

Van Hansis and Jake Silbermann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If that's what happened, then they are right. They have no obligation to kiss, and they are not a real-life couple.

If it is true, tho, that they were instructed not to, then that's :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Despite the fact that they were there as actors, they were also there for a nondiscrimination award! Had they chosen to do it then they should be able.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL people were upset that they didn't kiss on the red carpet and there was a rumor that the show told them not to. Van and Jake put out a statement saying it was their choice not to. They kissed Tala Ashe on the cheek on the red carpet though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Talk about "much ado about nothing"

I'm a big supporter of the Kiss Campaign too... but this whole GLAAD award thing has gotten WAAAAAAAY out of hand. The fact that Jake and Van had to issue a statement at all is beyond ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some people take soaps WAY to freakin' seriously. It's a freakin soap opera - ya know with characters who are portrayed by ACTORS. The ACTORS attended the event and had NO obligation to kiss for the fans who were there. Some fans need a reality check.

IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I understand it (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong), a photographer or someone asked for a kiss on the red carpet, and they declined. The rumor that started was that the show ordered them not to kiss prior to the event, and the hard-core Nukers jumped all over that to add to their kiss campaign.

ETA: "Hardcore" was the wrong word. There are a lot of hardcore RATIONAL Nuke fans out there, and I didn't mean to imply otherwise. No offense was intended to the Nuke fanbase. I love Nuke too. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sigh.

Anyone getting extremely tired of this war? No kiss? So what! There is a young, gay couple on a soap with ties to the other characters and they have a story! Just let it be, give it some time and there will be a kiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's unfortunate that the actors felt like they had to issue this or any other statement. But I understand where an expectation might have been set. Fans of HBO's "OZ" will no doubt remember the seriously hot kiss Chris Meloni and Lee Tergesen planted on each other at the 2000 GLAAD ceremony. I think that a lot of people want to see all straight actors playing gay characters exhibit the same willingness to raise a middle finger to expectation. But that's unrealistic and unfair. However one feels about "Nuke" or the actors who portray them, I think that these two (very young) actors have shown enough bravery and willingness to throw themselves into the fray. This is the time when we the audience needs to tell them "Sit back fellas. You've done your part. We'll take care of the rest."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am a straight black woman. But I really identify with Nuke fans desire to see Luke and Noah portrayed the same way as any other soap couple. The whole "just let it be and one fine day we'll gather together on the mountaintop" argument doesn't play.

I'll tell you what I am tired of. I'm tired of the AFA. The Phelps squad should stick to what they do best: masturbating with a noose around their necks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just think that we have come a long way. I know there is much more that needs to be done - in all TV - for the representation of gays. I myself am a gay man and would like to see the two kiss. But I don't think the lack of kissing sets the movement back. The story is helping things move forward. Just my opinion, hope I don't get eaten :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I never had much of a problem with Brandon Claybon's performance as Martin. He has gotten much better though. While I enjoy his confrontational scenes, I must say his lighter, and carefree scenes from Thursday's episode are the ones that stood out most in the last 3 days (to me).  
    • I know that Secret Storm had moved back to the 4/3 PM timeslot in the final months on air, so it's possible that they were trying to employ new techniques/elements to lure the teen demographic.   If that episode was around November/December 1973, I do wonder if the owners (AHS) were still trying to shop the show to other networks still.. or if they had accepted that the show was going to officially go off the air in Feb 1974 at the time of this episode airing.
    • Jordan should have been killed or written out a decade ago.
    • Xander kidnapped her a few times when she was a baby I much prefer this bitchy version of Rafe to the dull one we have had for the past few years. Leo would get on my last nerve too and I would probably have snapped by now too. Loved Roman and Doug3. My favourite scenes today. Much better than his forced kindness to Ava. About time somebody pointed out Sophia is an adult any minute and can decide her own life. This is not Handmaid's Tale. I bet Mrs Choi snatches that baby though if Sophia signs it over to 'strangers'  
    • Hmm, well, I thought yesterday was "Dialog City" so at least IMO it was well done talk. Today I'm all about how harsh Dante just was to Gio & I get it that he's so scared but it's all coming out like anger - and judgment, harsh judgment. But, what they're doing is putting as much bad, troubling icky stuff between Dante & Gio as they can & it's a set-up. Good writing, acting, directing, tho. What's weird is I only recently realized that Lulu does not know it's Gio. However, I just had a thought. One day last week someone tried to kill Sonny & got killed. That wasn't words. That was action. 
    • Yes, that's the way it went, the dramatic beats, the increased info dropped. Actually, his being Janice's son was such clever writing, at least IMO.  Yes, I was of this same impression. Both were charming but the first ... more layered maybe? More complex? The second maybe less sophisticated. 
    • His original motives were unclear and all we knew was that he was working for Iris. But when it was revealed that Evan was Janice's son we found out that he had fallen in with Iris not because he wanted to follow Iris specifically but because he had his own anti-Rachel agenda. Charles Grant had more charisma than the later recast Eric Scott Woods who seemed younger to me. 
    • Throwing this out to the universe: finding Elisabeth Shue's episode of As the World Turns (which I guess would have been circa 1983, maybe just before RDJ started watching Search for Tomorrow).

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy