Jump to content

AMC: Tues, Feb. 12


Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's not even 1:30 where I am, but I'm laughing at some things here.

How unrealistic is Kendall's book signing? One pen on the table, and when it runs out of ink, she has to dig down into her purse to find a new one?! :lol: And she's all alone.... no security, ect.

As I said in the dialogue thread, Erica's board meeting was hilarious, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What's even more unrealistic than the book signing is the book itself. A few weeks ago Greenlee sent it to a publisher and it was published without Kendall having to make nary a change and now it's already in print and Kendall is on a book tour. GMAFB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UkBoi, I agree, Sabine deserves the last laugh

They do this crap on top of all the criticism they got for the "Real Greenlee" BS? Yep B&E keep digging AMC's grave deeper and deeper.....

Sassy it's crazy. It was also stupid when the publisher wouldn't let her have her manuscript back at first especially when it was sent to them without Kendall's permission :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Carey Women

Well it seems as if Babe and Krystal never forget their roots: breaking the law. Now they are going into Joe Martin's office to find out who Ritchie's donor is...lo and behold, it is Clyde Chandler with Bonnie doing the breaking in and showing why they are known, by me, as Bonnie and Clyde Chandler. Got to love those Carey women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually think if that's all the Carey women are getting into then that seems pretty tame. I did chuckle at Joe's password being "Jenny" though. However Baker still hasn't thrown one ounce of effort into this role. Eakes did seem to try and make the situation comical. I love her for trying, but the mother/daughter vibe simply isn't there and Baker doesn't even seem to want to make it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just finished today's episode and to me it was classic soap opera. I really do think you guys are really reading into the "Real Greenlee" comments made today. I think what they were trying to convey is that she is starting fresh. She even made reference to things done before the recast, so I truly believe they were trying to redeem the character from all her past deeds by having Greenlee move on from them. Just my opinion though. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for saying this. Like you, I did not see it as a dig to Sabine but just Aidan saying she is better than the one who was in the bomb shelter hovering for her life. She is now even stronger emotionally wise than the last Greenlee, who did not survive such an ordeal like being trapped for several weeks. But it was about the character and not the actress. If it was a dig at Sabine, then shame on ABC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I thought today was still good. Leo is always awful, but the characters treating him like he's a plague feeds my soul. Rafe in particular had been very passive about him, but today was wonderful seeing him put Leo on notice. I really think it's being written that Javi is going to have to eventually take the blinders off and see Leo for who he really is. Them having sex on Gabi's desk made me want to explode. Roman taking in stray Doug was nice to see. And the mention of Frankie and Max was unexpected, but good to know they're at least being thought of. Tate being petty and a bit vindictive by going back to Sophia's as soon as he saw Doug with Holly was entertaining for me. I think I actually like Tate the most out of all of them because he's so damn messy.  Is Holly about to be kidnapped? Her first time?
    • That would have saved the Anita singing segment -- having her by herself, singing quietly and reflectively. Belting it out like she was in church did not work. The black screens fade at the end was a mistake. BTG insists on being different with these fades for the sake of being different, and it's not working.   I thought all of that was just fine. Worked for me.   I'm going to disagree with this. Martin hasn't had many scenes with his parents, but he's been around family A LOT -- and that's what matters. We also know Martin is someone with a hair trigger response. He can be very emotional when discussing an issue before getting to the logic and reason of it all.  
    • My view of Evan is that he's smart but not as smart as he thinks he is, not a good guy but not an entirely bad guy - he's a lot of things, the show never quite knowing what to do with them. I never saw him as Iris' follower because Iris always seemed a bit in over her head from the start. 
    • She was the Town Historian, who knew a bit too much about Brandon and the infamous cottage.  SF was still a pretty normal place at that time, with Nola and Reva being the most outrageous citizens....seems that Carrie Pipper would have stood out a bit more for people.
    • Credits for Tuesday, May 6, 2025: Created by: Frank & Doris Hursley Executive producer: Frank Valentini Head writers: Elizabeth Korte, Chris Van Etten Writers: Micah Steinberg, Kate Hall, Cathy Lepard Director: Tina Keller
    • Yes, I need to dot hat. Also on my list talking to the person I got these files from since they clearly have a mess, in terms of dates being wrong. And, unfortunately finding one date wrong, automatically means more are wrong, too. 
    • I'm hoping that it doesn't happen. If the show keeps putting out good performance and story it will be hard to shut it out. Daphnee, Trisha, Ambyr and Colby are earning nominations without question.
    • Speaking of correcting dates, since you mentioned it above, why don't you go back to your Saturday post and edit it and replace your wording of "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-2-83"  with "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-1-83" and add a note that the video has the wrong date of 11/2/83 on it, and that the video is actually 11/1/83. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy