Jump to content

I am in the new Soap Opera Digest


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't consider it offensive and yes she is someone who should be on the unemployment line because she has not one shred of talent in her writing fingers....she would not last five seconds under my employment that is for sure. A couple of years ago, 75% of her columns were about plastic surgery when they should have been about the soaps and the storylines. First of all, who freaking cares who gets plastic surgery? I guess she does not have a life of her own to worry about if she is so concerned about others making their own damn choices.

If I came face to face with her, I would seriously call her a b1tch to her face and she is not the Babe In Total Control of Herself kind (that would be my wife).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First of all, men can be raped by women. Happens more then people know. Heck, they do it on soaps all the time. Women drug the men and have sex with them.

But, your letter to Carolyn missed the point. You talked about how men CAN be raped by women, but then say ask all the children raped by priests.

Priests are men, not women and the two points, while valid are not connected.

So your point to her would have been better understood had you stuck to the topic.

But someone needs to call her out, I never liked her when I used to read that rag of a mag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kwing I understand what you are saying and I caught on to that when I read it but I think most people who read it will know what I am talking about and that is men can get raped when they are children....the priest part-well again yea I guess more appropriately it would be proper to call them nuns but women priests again people know what I am discussing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's her MO...she is so freaking predictable. Someone will writer her a letter calling her out on her stupidity, she posts the letter, then a few weeks later she posts a rebuttal letter towards the letter she posted in the first place.

Like I said earlier, she can post a rebuttal letter all she wants because I don't care anymore :)

Also, Fatsey is in love with his holiness so hence more reason to not care for her ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is also the question of sexual assault. Many would argue that a grown woman "cannot rape the willing" 14 year old boy, but legally it is sexual assault against a minor. Never called statutory rape.

A woman could strap on a dildo and perform the actual act of rape, and there should be no question about it because it would involve actual physical penetration of the victim.

But what if a man's life, or that of his family, is threatened if he does not assume the usual role in male-female intercourse? The woman in this case is the agressor so it is at least sexual assault. If she's feeding him viagra...?

Part of the problem is that "rape" is mostly a legal term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy