Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Soapsuds

    4192

  • Faulkner

    3003

  • DramatistDreamer

    2412

  • ChitHappens

    1615

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Yep. There’s no way this doesn’t lead to changes in how umpires operate.

 

Osaka has impressed me with her class and composure both during and after the match. And Serena was good to show she wasn’t angry at *Naomi* when they hugged.

 

 

 

Good on Serena for telling the crowd to stop booing. Naomi doesn’t deserve that.

Edited by Faulkner
  • Members
Posted

 

That's only what I would have expected of her. Naomi did absolutely nothing wrong. I understand that Serena was probably very upset and emotional at that moment, but if she had acted in any other way towards Naomi it would have been really unsportsmanlike and out of line.

  • Members
Posted

I know your blood is boiling. The Serena haters are definitely out in force in a way I haven’t seen since before the calendar year grand slam hunt. It’s going to get VERY ugly on social media.

  • Members
Posted

 

From that perspective maybe it's a good thing that her opponent was Naomi Osaka. Can you imagine what would have happened if it had been someone like Maria Sharapova, considering the history between those two... 

Please register in order to view this content

  • Members
Posted (edited)

She would have never been losing to Sharapova, but I take your point. And Naomi just isn’t hateable in the same way Maria is.

 

But just going back to the match. Naomi absolutely took the racquet out of Serena’s hands. She was better, full stop. She’s an amazing player and a deserving Grand Slam champion.

 

 

 

I wonder if there will be a rift between Serena and Patrick. In the press conference, Serena seemed pissed that he admitted coaching. But it was a misunderstanding. It wasn’t about Serena “cheating”; it was about Patrick’s behavior. The rules aren’t clear to the players.

 

 

 

 

Note that Jared Donaldson wasn’t penalized for physically getting in an umpire’s face.

 

Saw this:

 

 

 

 

Edited by Faulkner
  • Members
Posted

It was an incredible achievement for Osaka and honestly, it didn't really surprise me that she won. 

 

That coaching warning controversy though was, just ay ay ay.  And Patrick just thinks a bit too highly of himself.

Also Carlos Ramos has a bit of a reputation over issuing questionable decisions. Look it up.

 

It was an unforgettable match, that's for sure.

  • Members
Posted

I was wondering if you were watching this year, especially with the courts so slow. It’s been a sh!tshow with the unsafe heat conditions making play sloppy and umpires inserting themselves into matches in questionable ways (Cornet, Kyrgios, Serena). But I thought Nadal/Thiem and Cilic/De Minaur were all-time classic matches. Great shotmaking and fight, especially from the youngsters. The women unfortunately disappointed, aside from Osaka/Sabalenka and today in spite of the madness.

  • Members
Posted

 

To be honest, I'd by lying if I didn't admit that my enthusiasm was dampened when I saw that Venus and Serena were going to facing each other so early in the tournament but I did see matches here and there, mostly in the 2nd week.

 

These tennis tournaments can be such a mess and made worse by sometimes questionable decision making and conflicts of interests being injected into the sport. 

And just think, we now have a strangely revamped Davis Cup format to add to all the chaos.  Fun times.

  • Administrator
Posted

Congrats to Naomi being the first Japanese woman to win a grand slam.  I didn't get to see the match but saw the highlights.  The way Naomi plays, wow, I think she could be tennis' next big thing.  I know it's just one grand slam, but I think she *could* be Serena's heir apparent.    It really sucks that this win for her was overshadowed with controversy.    I never understand why players can't get coaching - to have communication.  Coaching is a big part of sports and I wish tennis would change this rule. 

  • Members
Posted

 

Why, because she's emotional when she has something on the line?  Serena is not responsible for Osaka and she has a right to be angry and fight for what she believes is right.  The timing was off for Osaka's first Slam, but again, that's not Serena's problem.   Naomi played amazing tennis and she's going home a Slam Champion, taking $3.8m with her.  She will be fine.  I don't like when BabyRena surfaces, but I will be damned if I will give kudos to Ramos when the men are out here getting coached by umpires, killing rackets, putting their hands on linesmen, screaming at them as they take their shirts off and sit for minutes at a time with no worries.  Nadal gets coached from the stands, abuses the time clock and has umpires removed.  Come on now! 

 

 

 

 

Naomi is certainly the heir apparent.  Sascha has done an outstanding job.  

The thing about the coaching is that Serena didn't even see it.  The rule is the player has to pay the price, but damn!  She never uses on court coaching because Serena can usually figure out how to adjust so I understand her not wanting to be labeled a cheat.  Couple that with getting clocked by your opponent and things don't end well.  When history is on the line, Queen does awful.  How long did it take to get to 18?  Patrick not only was cheating, but then he rats out others?  That's the most foul of all of this.  Rat!  

 

Lastly, y'all know Serena has been thru it in NY. Some her own doing and some of it has to do with umpires playing her dirty.  How did we get Hawkeye?  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton practically twirling his moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lol. Right?  I mean the show could have framed the 60th anniversary in a different way, but the narrative was celebrating Tom and the hospital. Also, what a weirdly sexist bunch of posts about women's nail polish.  Like, yes, this is Days problem lol.  Stacy Haiduk isn't a good Kristen because she doesn't wear nail polish?  Are we in the 1950's???
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy