Jump to content

Primetime Soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

That All That Glitters episode was interesting to watch. I'm assuming/hoping it was relatively early in the run, since they sure seemed to be hitting us hard with the gimmick of the role reversals.

That theme song is the pits. Is that Gary Sandy singing?

Since he had the most to do, I'd declare Chuck McCann as the episode's MVP. On the other hand, my favorite scene was David Haskell & Greg Evigan's confrontation. 

You also get a sense of how the play on TV style isn't as compatible with soaps as one would assume. I found myself missing the undercoring that would come with scenes like David and Greg's, or Chuck and Lois Nettleton's.

And look, Meg Wylie and Jessica Walter in the ending teaser!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought that episode was a lot of fun! Of course we need to see more  to truly judge since it’s just a random episode of a show that I believe aired 5 episodes a week. 
 

I was surprised that they played it completely straight. I would love to see at least a full week to see how the story progresses. It’s a shame this hasn’t made if to DVD as they were releasing so many Lear shows. Seems like it would be easy to do. I didn’t notice any pop music in the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

`All That Glitters' falters in ratings. Lear show's numbers are off in three top markets after fast start, but there is not total unhappiness,

Norman Lear's controversial soap opera satire, All That Glitters, after solid first week sampling in the Nielsen overnights in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, has dropped off in all three markets, tumbling particularly severely in New York.

Glitters, according to researchers at WPIX(TV) New York, which plays the series each weekday evening from 11:30 to midnight, started off its first week (April 18 -22) with a 5.1 average rating and a 16 share. From April 25 to 29, it fell to a 4.1 rating and a 12 share. And for the week of May 2, Glitters managed only a 3.3 rating and 9 share. That's only a shade higher than the numbers WPIX was getting for the umpteenth reruns of The Honeymooners, the old Jackie Gleason half hour.

If Glitters doesn't rebound, WPIX sources say the station will be forced to cancel it, on the theory that anything below a 5 average rating would drop the rate -card price (now a reported $1,000 a minute) too low for WPIX to make a profit on it

KCOP(TV) Los Angeles' statisticians say that Glitters, which KCOP strips at 8 p.m., went from an 8 rating and 11 share for the premiere week of April 18 to a 6 rating and.9 share the next week to a 4 rating and 6 share the third (and most recent) week. But, in mitigation, Pete Schlesinger, the KCOP program director, says that the networks have frontloaded specials in the last two weeks to take advantage of the May sweeps and that he expects Glitters' audience to grow in June.

"The networks orient their programming to children at 8 o'clock," Mr. Schlesinger says. "We've got the adult show that's perfect counterprograming, so we'll get a higher concentration of the 18 -to -49 year olds."

On WFLD -TV Chicago, Glitters, at 10:30 every weeknight, kicked off with an 8 rating and 16 share average for April 18 to 22. It fell to a 5 rating and 11 share from April 25 to 29. But the show appears to have at least temporarily stabilized, hanging on to a 5 rating and 10 share for the week of May 2. "We're delighted with the numbers," says Dave Kenin, the program director of WFLD -TV, despite the fact that Glitters runs fifth in the time period, with WMAQTV Chicago's Johnny Carson network talk show (which averages about a 13 rating and 27 share) and WLS -TV Chicago's combination of off- network cop shows, made for TV movie reruns and specials (which average 11 ratings and 23 shares) number one and two at 10:30.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"You Don't Bring Me Flowers" sung by a male (Neil Diamond) would've probably worked better 

Please register in order to view this content

I vaguely remember this show from when I was a little kid.  From an urban, corporate standpoint, where very few women held upper-level positions, it was a clever idea, perhaps for a 90-minute movie, but it didn't seem terribly sustainable as a nightly show.  Once you'd learned the "gimmick", you'd learned it, and that was that.  

For the rest of us, out in agrarian America, it seemed like a rather silly concept from the get-go.   In a farming family, the husband was usually the farmer (breadwinner), but the wife was his partner in the venture and had equal input.  She also ran the house.  And invariably, there was an old widow woman down the road who knew more about agriculture and family life than either the husband OR the wife, and she was ultimately the person everyone listened to.  ("Marsha, tell Jeff he'd better not plant his corn next week.  There's going to be another hard freeze; I saw it in the Farmer's Almanac.  And honey, you'd better re-think your kitchen design.  You're putting too many steps between the refrigerator and stove, and you're going to wear yourself out walking back and forth.  And there's no sense in taking Jeff Junior to the doctor.  His leg ain't broken, it's just sprained -- put some ice on it, and it'll be better in the morning.")  Everybody just said "yes ma'am" and did what the old lady said, because she was always right.  Never was a question who the real "boss" was! 

That was probably a strange concept in New York, LA, and Chicago, but it was everyday life for most rural folks in the 1970s. 

All That Glitters was clearly designed for an urban audience, and once they'd seen it for the first week, the point had been made, and there wasn't much sense in continuing to watch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For some reason, @Broderick, you're reminding me of this play, "Trifles," that I read either in junior high or high school, lol.

I agree: ATG's premise was great for a 90-minute movie, but I can't see how it could sustain itself as a nightly or weekly series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was reading THR's obituary on the recently passed actor David McKnight and in it a show called Bird of an Iron Feather is mentioned as the first all black soap opera that aired on a Chicago station for the first few months of 1970. I know there was a similarly sounding show that has been previously discussed here before but I can't remember if they are one and the same.

Edited by Bright Eyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The other show is called The Awakening. A friend from Chicago and I were talking about it a few years ago, I was so jealous that I didn't have a similar local viewing pleasure growing up. It's a hoot.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I felt for Ted early on but as the story unfolded it has changed my opinion on him. To know he was cheating while his wife was struggling to give him a baby is a lot to deal with. Plus, this happened ages ago and still he's paying Leslie off and threatening her to leave town.  What really caused me to lose him in this episode was how even though he was busted, he still refused to take responsibility and come clean and the way he talked to Martin and Eva was terrible. To tell Smitty he better get Martin away from him when that is his SON who he used to cover up his affair? That is true dog behavior. Ted seems upset he got caught but I'm not seeing the remorse I would need to want Nicole to forgive him. I'm curious how I'll feel after Ted gets to talk to Nicole but I need him to fix it with the rest of the family as well.
    • I'm sorry. I well remember Jake doing Doris but I have no independent memory of the story around it.  Krystle with a K Lake, sure, both Tony the Tuna stories & NOT.  And, Jake also impersonated a woman named Bunny Eberhardt but he didn't know she was a woman so there was no drag. This weekend I re-watched Kevin & Mac, GH, and my strong impression is exactly what it was when I watched it in real time: They did not let them look very pretty. Of course, I think the best ever drag on GH was Alexis posing as the Q butler.  In a different use of drag at AW one Halloween, Jensen Buchanan went as Charlie Chaplin & Judi Evans went as, I think, a male gypsy.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm not sure who wanted them to dump REUNION & instead do a "Dallas-like daytime show" but it seems that it def came from NBC to AW through Rauch, so, yes, it absolutely could have been his (cough-another-stupid?) decision!!!! I've just begun the new Lisanti book so maybe I will find out. (I waited for the kindle version to come out.) I would apologize for being so critical & so sarcastic, too, but, well, I'm not actually sorry!  Silverman was NOT a friend to AW.  And, I believe the critique is on point & deserved! I wanted to explain why I think the timing is off for the 90 minute show to be a reaction to the GH Luke & Laura story & its hype. Because, for sure, networks & production companies did react to it! The first 90 minute show was Monday, March 5, 1979.  And, there was some unknown amount of time ahead of that with people arguing about it & then, planning it.  The Luke & Laura wedding was mid-November 1981.  They were on the run from Frank Smith & stayed overnight in Wyndham's Dept. Store early August 1980. 
    • terrible at using forums and inserting photos, but jake in another world had a drag persona named doris, anyone know the episode or year? http://www.anotherworldhomepage.com/ffad19.jpg
    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy