Jump to content

ATWT: New Opening Debuts on April 30th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 413
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I just don't understand why the actors look so weird in the opening. They're all making weird head movements... looking to one side, then looking straight forward, then looking the other way. It's almost as if they're robots! LoL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The short version's music is much better than the long version. It is the graphics that tick me off. It is a perfect example of what is wrong with the show. Most of the charactrs who are featured in the front have been with the show for a shorter time than the people behind them. Ie: Van Hansis is behind newAllison, Kelly Hensley is behind Grayson McCouch, Maura West is behind Mike Park, Terri Colombino is behind Trent Dawson and Marie Wilson is beind Austin Peck. The "vet" are behind the newbies... not cool.

Also, this fields of gold thing sucks. The Globe is the main symbol of ATWT. How hard is it to make an opening revolved around that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like that they're not doing those cheesy smiles anymore. Everyone looks great and they look dramatic like they should on a soap. Well... I love love love it!

Some people seem to want the globe more involved. Personally I don't wanna watch a globe turning, I want to see the characters. It's enough at the end with the logo. Let's face it, it could be worse like with DAYS. All we see there is the hourglass spinning... 6bnxw1y.gif Yeah yeah, I know it's a classic. But still... I wouldn't mind seeing a few faces there maybe with the hourglass in the background or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that is the MAIN thing that's wrong with alot of soap operas and their opening credits...thinking someone's face identifies the show. Its not a bad thing that character's faces are in the opening titles, but the show isn't about just one person. Whenever I watch the opening credits of a show I've never seen before, it should clearly identify what the show is about or what it should be about.

If I'm seeing fields of gold on the screen, windmills and all, that doesn't describe what AS THE WORLD TURNS means to its legion of fans or the audience. It's not THAT hard to put a spinning globe in one or two places. I've said it before...I like the new credits. I just don't think they decribe to the audience WHAT AS THE WORLD TURNS means to them.

I could say that with Y&R and B&B because their shows are based and built on glamour.

DAYS doesn't need faces in their opening credits. They have a hard enough time with everything else on that show. Not to mention I would hate to be stuck with years and years of of what ATWT's main problem was: obviously mixed film and taped shots of the cast members. Corday just wouldn't want to keep updating the pictures and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will agree about Peck and nuAli getting such prominent pictures. But the difference in time with Mike and Maura is about six months total, and Trent's been on the show almost as long as Teri...he was just on recurring. I actually LIKE that TIIC are finally giving Trent a LITTLE of the respect he deserves. He's a two-time emmy nominee for goodness' sake.

I kind of expect that there's a couple of other versions and not everyone in the background in one version will be in the background in another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My dream version of the opening would be:

*an open shot of Nancy at home that dissolves in to

*Bob in a Memorial Hospital setting ,maybe with Susan that dissolves into

*Kim at WOAK maybe with Katie and Brad,Maddie,Luke and Jake but the main focus is Kim.That dissolves into

*Margo at the police station with Tom and Jack and Dallas,that dissolves into

*Worldwide with Lucinda,Lily, and Craig and finally

* the Lakeview with Barbara and Henry and others but features closeup shots of Lisa.

* then back to Nancy to end it.

It won't happen,but I can dream!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

      Yes, Nicole. DRAG HER!
    • Writers: Teresa Zimmerman Lynn Martin Director: Steven Williford
    •  Yeah, he is still dressed like Martin. He looks great, though.  Cute picture. Sober up, cause we need the tea.
    • Well, Claire did rig Rick's test results, but it was to flunk. They actually managed to get his correct results back after they were thrown into Cedar's furnace...I think? Everyone knew Claire changed them and Rick passed so that rewrite never made sense.   I agree. Pratt always seems "edgy" on screen (and her Locker Room interview prooved that it came from her personality.) I liked Claire causeing trouble and love Meta ringing her beads. Its just too bad that Abby left and they kinda just forgot Claire existed. 
    • Oh so they did sleep together. The retcon was just the medical boards? That makes sense. I think Susan Pratt, while a good actress, was just an unlikeable presence onscreen and soaps wrote to that most of the time. There was some potential for more with her when she returned in that stint, as Pratt was at least interesting to watch and caused some conflict for the stifled Bauers. Instead of pairing her with Alan and then disappearing I might have had her hook up with Danny. I think there was a lot of flirtation with Bolger's Philip, but they never crossed the line.
    • I haven't seen Melchior in the role, but it would be astounding if she's worse than Linn. Her rivalry with Stephanie was sidelined IMO because Linn was one of the few actors who didn't have chemistry with, nor raise her game, when paired with Susan Flannery. To be fair, she did show some signs of life in scenes opposite Darlene Connelly, but way too little too late. It feels like Bell finally woke up after the Thorne switchover and sidelined the Kristin character with Mick to 1 or 2 appearances a week. As a result, the show improved by leaps and bounds after she was inexplicably at the center of the show for most of 1989. Margo is so much more enjoyable when not tied to that albatross. Even Clarke is watchable with less Kristin interaction. She can't exit stage left soon enough. As for the new Thorne, I agree that Norcross feels like a Forrester a lot more than Thrachta, even if the latter is a better actor.
    • The cast said that scenes were filmed over a few weeks, with a preplanned hiatus in the middle, and it was all out of order.  I would *guess* that they used Chandler when they could get him? They also had to work around Leo Howard getting married around the time these episodes were filmed, but I guess they worked it out since Tate appeared.
    • Maybe there was a scheduling conflict or something. He still has the full time 9-5 in Atlanta, right? Julie was there. Idk if Maggie’s gonna be a part of it though 
    • At this point, the best nonpaywall coverage of Los Angeles (and anything political)  is in...the Tennessee Holler https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social And as always, emptywheel continues to be consistent https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social
    • Today Monday was the start of people arriving at the funeral, but the service hasn't started yet.  I know this is the nonspoiler thread but I think it's okay to say (in nonspecific terms) that the funeral episodes span a few days.  I won't detail it more here. Just sayin' keep watching.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy