Jump to content

Y&R Discussion: Week of February 19th


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Kevin and Colleen???? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

I don't have a problem with Kevin leaving the dark side and Colleen forgiving him. But sex? He still TRIED TO KILL HER. This soap trend of forgiving and then having sex with your stalker/rapist, etc. is sickening and very demeaning to women. And to trade the real sexual chemistry of Colleen & Adrian for. . . Kevin? Who wants to watch? Ick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Drew, it is just a simple request with this. No one is asking anyone to agree with everyone's opinions - just to respect them. There is absolutely no reason that anyone's opinions should be made fun of. And that is all those type of responses are doing. A person does not have to agree with what a person is saying and they can express that. But there is no reason for anyone's opinion to be called absurd or for it to be laughed at - whether this is a messageboard or not.

This is something that we can all do - from the person who is doing the offending to the person who is being offended.

A few weeks ago when we had a discussion in one of the threads that Greg (Juniorz) started about posts being closed, this was one of the things brought up many times. I just don't see it a big deal to respond to a person with words, and words that do not ridicule the person or their opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So something just occured to me:

If Stephanie Forrester and Katherine share a history, then why doesn't Katherine pick up a phone and call Stephanie and by like, hey, what's up with this girl Amber Moore who has attached herself to my hip AKA pocketbook?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This would definitely be too much logic for Y&R. And keep in mind that Kay AND Jill have been dumbed to stupid schoolgirls... :angry:

Another wonderful achievement by the writing department that left me beyond impressed: The Czech government officials talking to their boss, the minister, in ENGLISH. WTF!? I'd say that native speakers still speak their native language while talking to each other. The last time I checked Czechs speak Czech. But I guess I'm wrong... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OH and I forgot to add:

Cane is hot!!! LOL :)

And...this is our precious Alison recast?? Seriously?? I attempted to defend the storyline when I first heard about it, but OMG!! Seriously...OYE!!! This is just bad and full of shame...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^^^^

Word. Considering all the build-up for the requilery storyline, Katherine and Jill and their storyline, and finally who actually killed Carmen Mesta and what you have is a great letdown with all of these storylines and a soap that is only a shell of its' former self.

It is like what Eileen Davidson said in an interview as she was leaving the show. She said the show is, "an whole new animal." Who knows how much worse this "whole new animal" has truly become behind the scenes with LML running the show into the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Latham has ruined the show. She's done an amazing job of getting in ratings and reviving the show and getting lots of attention in the press. Yes, some negative, but people are tuning in. Look at Anna Nicole, the entertainment shows are getting record ratings and Howard Stern is earning millions for interviews.

Latham has great ideas for stories, about a faster pace, better dialogue and some good character ideas, but her Y&R fails over the long term. For Carmen's story she made a big deal about how she had everything mapped out from beginning to end. This tells me she doesn't do this for other stories and it shows. If she mapped her stories out and RESEARCHED them to see how to execute them, she'd be brilliant.

So, in the short term I do think she creates interesting episodes, but it could be a million times better which is so irritating. Ultimately I don't think she's right for Y&R unless they get her a good co-headwriter to balance things. Latham is a mixed bag, but certainly not a total failure.

Y&R needs to keep searching for the perfect Bill Bell replacement, but with the ratings and newly positive comments from critics, Latham will be here for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
But just cause viewers watch doesn't necessarily make it good.

...Look at NBC/ABC.

Just about every major story she's done has been a rehash.

And the rehashes were done better. Much better.

There's a difference between fast & frentic.

Fast is the sign of a good story moving from one logical conclusion to another.

Frentic is a slapdash story flailing about due to lack of any real cohesive structure or significant character development.

Latham? Is all about The Frentic.

This is the one area where she does pretty good at.

But given that she doesn't know the characters it falls flat. Really flat.

Phelia "Quip Master" Carter? Nikki "Flesh & Blood" Newman? Neil "Loved You At First Sight" Winters?

Her ideas are ok but they don't fit the characters she wants to utilize them for.

So she proceeds to stretch them totally out of shape and/or make them act wildly OOC in order to facilitate the plot (which itself is usually a mess).

She doesn't have a vision cause she doesn't know and/or care about the show.

As bad as Alden was (and she was), she at least knew the show & could (at times) do interesting things with various characters that didn't always depend on plot contrived occurances.

The same can't be said for LML.

LML is the female Guza.

She utilizes a frentic pace & incredibly slapdash writing to create "moments" that don't amount to anything but gratuitous sweeps stunts, an abundance of ruined characters & a show that's gone from occasionally boring to nearly unwatchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Yes. but in order to see such huge ratings increases (which just keep going up and maintaining), people must be enjoying what they watch. If they weren't Y&R would be in a ratings freefall like most of the other soaps. I'm also not crazy about Guza at GH, but now the ratings are up a million and they will definitely overtake B&B. I can very easily see how lapsed and new viewers could be pulled into a Latham episode and love it.

I agree, this is her biggest problem. A great example is Jack and Gloria and how their writing shifts for the storyline.

I agree, she was good at faking it, but now I see this very clearly. Like this Jill and Katherine story which could show she respects the history, but it doesn't. She couldn't even get the basic facts like Phillip's age and Nina and Phillip IV. She'll give a Mamie mention or something, but I'm not fooled. How hard is it to research when you can ask any question on a soap message board and find your answer?

I haven't thought of that, but you are correct! GH and Y&R could both be so much better if the writers tried a little bit more and if they cared about history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Or folk could just be watchin out of habit.

And given that way that Y&R's always skewed that's a definite possibility.

Not really. Cause the difference between Y&R and other soaps is that Y&R is/was #1.

It wasn't strugglin to maintain/retain an audience like the other soaps.

And there's almost always a ratings increase with new writing regimes.

The real test will be whether or not can LML maintain that audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely disagree. Y&R may have been #1 (thanks to a large lead in), but if you look at the ratings archives you will see the ratings were dropping and dropping over the years. They needed a change and I think Latham has proved she can maintain the ratings since they've been rising since she arrived a year ago.

And in todays ratings age, just because a new regime joins doesn't mean the ratings get a boost. Look at the much pimped Hogan at DAYS, it's not doing anything. If people didn't think it was good they wouldn't stick around. Why watch out of habit a show they've just begun watching? Or why would lapsed viewers stick around if they thought it was crap? If they had stopped watching, surely they won't watch a bad show out of habit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
But that's not an isolated occurance.

Ratings have dropped for every soap.

Y&R needed fresher stories & possibly a few new characters.

But just about every (if not all) of LML's "changes" have been disasters.

Hogan's a bit different tho.

He's had to helm a rapidly sinkin ship that's barely stayin afloat (for a myriad of reasons), he's also had to contend with the mess JERk left as well as implementing his own ideas in order to try to woo back some of the audience that JERk ran off.

Hope. That things will get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, Josh was a horndog. LOL Yep. It was one of the first really weird things Reva did with her PPD. She became obsessed with the idea that Dylan and Sam should get married. Sam was only 17, and needed her parent's permission. Reva helped them leave town so they could go to a neighboring state where Sam was old enough. Ross, Billy and Josh stopped them, then Sam went to India to try and persaude Justin. Reva followed her and didn't tell Josh she was going. While Reva was gone, Josh advertised for nannies, and Harley applied. He ended up hiring someone else. But when Reva returned, she hired Harley because (in her weird mental state) she wanted someone she could trust with the kids (because she feared Josh was trying to get rid of her and that Vanessa wanted the children.). After Reva starts treatment, she asks Harley to stay until she's stronger because she's good with the kids. At the party, Reva starts going off the rails, insulting Justin and Josh hauls her to a private dining room to ask WTF. Reva starts confronting him about the "affair" with Vanessa, and he realizes she is weird. He locks her in the dining room and frees Mindy and Van from the ladies room (where Reva has locked them in). Van starts telling him that Reva attacked her and needs help.  Reva escapes out the window of the dining room and goes back to the party, climbs onto a table and starts a striptease. Josh gets her to stop, takes her home and after filling Ed in, decides to go to the doctor the next day. Reva then takes off and spends days running around town, coming on to a guy she thinks is Billy, Billy, Hamp, Frank and Roger.  Roger takes her to his apartment and takes nude pictures of her, which he tries to blackmail Billy with. He wants the deed to the land the Towers is on in exchange for them. (Billy had been left the deed by a sweet old lady who lost her home in the 5th street fire. Roger had stolen the deed from her before she died. After Roger took those pics of Reva, she saw him hide them, and took an envelope from the hiding place. She didn't realize she'd taken the deed and not the pictures.)  Anyway, Billy and Vanessa trick Roger into burning the pictures, claim the deed and at the Towers opening reveal that Billy owns the land and therefore the Towers. That's what led to Roger and Alex's breakup and Roger and Mindy's affair.
    • All the time they spent trying to make viewers feel sorry for Chad only for him to not even last that long. I wonder if they knew Richard Burgi was going so quickly. You're right about Josie replacing Cheryl. On paper, this should have made sense, given all the ties Josie had to the canvas, but I did prefer Cheryl. There was something very synthetic about Alexandra Wilson.  I suppose even if she did have some fans they were just so used to getting rid of people left and right, so she was more collateral damage. As you said above I do wonder what the plans were for Peggy Lazarus. I think AWHP mentioned her once telling Peter that Peggy Lazarus wasn't her real name. Maybe she would have been another Carl moll... Rebecca Hollen never did get her due in her soap roles.
    • So true...Hackney might have had a story on FC with Richard being an old lover of his, but reveals herself to be a Cartel member and blackmails Richard with something into doing her dirty work  LOL. But of course Richard had his hands full with the double trouble sisters Ms. Jones and Ms. Braxton that season.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cat herself will be a stumbling block all her own as she vowed to Chad to stay away from him, thus redeeming her of her crime morally. Classic DAYS would have them gazing longingly at each other at Doug's Place or Blondie's, while Liz is serenading the room with a song aptly chosen to represent their feelings of emotional turmoil.
    • From what I just recently watched, they were setting her up to go into future stories. She was Emmy nomination worthy in the material I saw. If some viewers did not like her, the character could have been rehabilitated after that sick storyline. It feels like they destroyed a character for fun and then tossed her to the curb. Spencer had chemistry with everyone. I'm just retroactively angry on Spencer's behalf.  You're right about how Cheryl was often forgotten and pushed aside and I would take Cheryl over Josie. I think soaps need characters like Cheryl. Characters like Josie are way too common. Josie always got on my nerves.
    • CBS was back in third place in 1994/95. That was the season CBS lost NFL broadcasting rights which also cost them several established affiliates in major media markets. 1995 CBS was sold to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. 1995/96 CBS was trying to be young and cool to compete with NBC and Fox, but it was an epic failure and CBS was once again in third place.
    • I tend to think that Chad will actually listen to Jen (this time). And that will be the next stumbling block in their relationship, which will open the possibilities for Cat to seek another member of their love triangle... To iterate my earlier thought, I am also not a fan of the person Melissa Reeves, but the character of Jennifer looks so chic this week, especially in comparison to Hope (and Gabi).  That blunt haircut is a winner.   
    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. Their connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters. All this talk of Jennifer being in the wrong regarding Cat is absurd. Jennifer is not being villainized in any way, shape, or form, she's just being allowed to actually be human, which adds odds to the obstacle of Chad and Cat eventually getting together. All inner conflict. Keep it coming!
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy