Jump to content

2007: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

In the last two days I've been accused of being Victoria Rowell (four times) and [s.W.S.N.B.N.] (twice).

I happen to know Bola and am aware that she quit posting at WOST because all these "copycats"

started trying to make like they were her on other boards and it turned out that Peter Brash, another

writer at "Days of Our Lives" was involved in trying to use the internet and [!@#$%^&*]'s presence on it to make

her look bad.

He said some real scandalous b.s. about her that I hear cost him his job.

I'm assuming this is one of the boards he hit with the b.s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Knowing Bola, she was too busy being "honest" to try and be clever.

I take it you're one of the ones spreading the lies about her posting here?

Funny how you didn't dare QUOTE the part about "white boy" Peter Brash, Mr. "Black Invasion".

Anyway, just so long as you know my name is WESS and I'm not in this mess.

LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another excuse. From all I read about [!@#$%^&*] and her ideas about soaps, I can tell you I like her way of thinking. Pitty she's not 

working for any of those anymore. Or maybe she is, but undercover.

You can check my 600 or more posts and see that I didn't defame anyone. I don't know why I even bother proving anything... :rolleyes:

I actually never read those topics about [!@#$%^&*] in great detail, I didn't have the patience to go through them all, but of those I did read, not one was racist or anything similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they make Culliton co-HW then I will get truly excited, because that woman CAN WRITE!

It's a shame she's not the HW, but I doubt she would accept the HW position, because she prefers

doing "back-up" work.

I also love Richard Culliton. I'm probably misspelling their names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always seem to get mixed up as to whether to spell it with one L or two L's LOL. So you are not alone.

I have always been a strong advocate of Richard's writing and if the ax does finally fall on Jean Passanante's head he should be promoted to head writer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Cullitons indeed are some of Soap's finest. I don't recall ever hearing negative things about the pair. I really wish, they would team up and take over ATWT, which needs help as well as GL. I am not to sure if they are working right now. Are the Cullitons employed by any soaps now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Every holiday season, the Cullitons send out these neat elfin-embroidered cloth napkins to almost everyone

in the industry wishing them a happy X-mas/new year. When you unfold the napkin, they have all kinds of

little goodies in there.

They are the nicest people in N.Y. bar none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I love their writing, so I really like how the Cullitons' reputation has gotten better lately. However, there was a time in 1997 when Richard Culliton was bashed mercilessly by TV Guide's Michael Logan, who called him "Cullitoon." Tony Geary was disgruntled, and had a meal with Culliton where apaprently Geary was annoyed that Culliton didn't realize that he didn't get Geary's character Luke, and there were even some rumors Geary punched Culliton. There were also rumors that Geary demanded that Culliton be fired.

Many GH fans at the time were convinced that Bob Guza had left this amazing wonderful story in 1996 for Culliton with the Cassadines and the Spencers and the hospital, which Culliton supposedly then botched after a few months. They theorized that his first few months were great because he was still following Guza's story up to Laura's faked death in December 1996, and then they thought he ruined GH after that until he left in May/June 1997, even though looking back there was clearly great material for Alan and Monica in early 1997. Also Culliton created Alexis and Taggert. I also liked several other stories in this time as well.

Now, I hope most GH fans who have lived through Guza's tenure realize that Guza is not some amazing visionary writer who could do no wrong, lol.

To me, it's more likely that the distraction of creating Port Charles, and the departure (I think) of Karen Harris as GH's co-head-writer, contributed to the somewhat increased boredom factor of GH during early 1997. Even so, I enjoyed it, and thought it was good character-based storytelling. His GH is what first turned me on to Richard Culliton.

There are also some old Usenet posts where Richard was bashed by an industry "insider", a dialogue writer and former actor, as arrogant but talentless. This dialogue writer, who wrote for ATWT in the mid-1990s, complained that Richard disliked soap dialogue writers -- that Richard thought soap dialogue writers kept writing 1950s "Love of Life" dialogue. The writer claimed that the only note he ever got from Richard as headwriter that made sense to the writer was to have "more Edward Albee and less Tennessee Williams" in his dialogue writing style. The same writer called Carolyn Culliton the "ex-stenographer" wife of Richard, as if that should be a putdown of Carolyn's writing ability, so I don't really give his views much credibility. :rolleyes: To me it sounds like the writer was challenged by Richard Culliton to write better and is personally bitter instead of taking on the constructive criticism.

More recently, Sean-Paul Riesing on WOST has written some good things about Richard Culliton's writing, but also said that Culliton was a bit arrogant at GL under Pam Long in the late 1980s in terms of thinking of himself as a senior writer, because Culliton had worked on GL with Pam Long during her first headwriting run as well. Still Riesing seemed to think that the GL writing team mostly worked well together, so Culliton probably was not way way arrogant. (Riesing was a part of this GL writing team in the late 1980s.)

So, anyway, it's good to know from IMissDrusilla that Richard and Carolyn are now perceived as the nicest people in N.Y. bar none, and that they give these great Christmas/New Year's gifts! Yay! Now I can love them even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • All this! Especially the highlighted. If today was any indication to what's to come, I see Mona and Shanice roles being beefed up. I personally think they are going to test her out with Doug.  I initially was didn't see it for Kat, since the Eva reveal, and few of her scenes around it. Made me warm to her for some reason. 
    • Agreed, pretty much with everything. The dialogue bugs the hell out of me. I don’t think a lot of it even works written out on a page, much less spoken. Even a veteran like TT can’t help but sound stagey with such purple prose. Re: the Duprees. I’m guessing that they’re holding their cards close to their vest on them for the various mysteries that will unfold, but I wish they weren’t so opaque and tonally weird as characters, especially in these make-or-break early days. (One reason why I wish they’d give up on keeping secrets from the audience and just allow them to speak freely, allowing the tension to come from what other characters don’t know.) Dani is giving Carly Corinthos realness, which isn’t a compliment. Oh, don’t get me started on the Black male characters and the tropes they’ve employed thus far. I had hoped a Black-created, NAACP-co-produced soap would be more cognizant of these traps, but nope. At least it seems like they’re playing the long game with Andre and Dani after all this feening over basic Ashley.
    • I feel like the reason they went with these two stories is because these are common stories told on soaps that allowed them to really tie the entire canvas in and help develop their relationships. I do understand the implications of having two cheating stories and these being Black characters but MVJ has always been clear that she wanted to show us the same way characters are featured on any soap. I don't think any story should be off limits just because the majority of the characters are Black. We have several positive representations of Black men so it's not like everybody is a cheater or a bad spouse. I also think the two stories and relationships are different enough that the stories don't feel similar in any way.
    • Well, on that point, I am one fan, and I know I'm not alone in this, who thinks that it is possible to have a time or times on a show where the ratings do not reflect the show's popularity & I think that is because it is possible for the metric to be broken. 
    • The Anita scene with Ted was written all wrong. Dani should have come in like she did, all guns blazing, with Anita showing up and ushering Dani out, as she stays alone with Ted. He's ready for more fury, but at first she treats him like her son, not just some man Nicole married, she's confused and heartbroken, needing explanation. Then, she drops the motherload and tells him to get his damn act together like she did. Anita came off completely one-note. And with both Dani and Anita in the scene, the self-righteousness just made both look like harridans who wouldn't shut the hell up. Very disappointed in that scene. The scene with Eva was much better. It could be good if somehow Vernon starts to soften towards her and that puts the first signs of strife into their marriage. We need something interesting to happen with them, for once. Mona was the MVP today for me. I love Leslie and especially Eva, but I was firmly on Mona's side today. She deserved to get her two cents in. The scenes just left me wanting more of her and her inner life. They should really drop Ashley, Derek, and Tomas and put Mona, Laura, and Shanice on contact stat! I don't get why Leslie continued to lie about where she got the money Ted gave her though? What purpose would that serve? Faint hopes that Mona would still forgive her, I guess? Kat really gets some of the best lines. Through all the bitchiness and judgment, she has a talent at keeping me on side because somehow she's never come across unlikable to me, where someone like Dani, even Anita, falls. The scene with her, Martin, and Nicole was a necessity. Things are coming together to making that part of the family feel more like a family. Now I anxiously await Kat and Ted having a one on one confrontation. It would be perfect if it happened to be in the new Ted's first scene/episode.
    • They’ve been really nailing the fall out super well and your whole post really highlights some of the great parts and ramifications we’re seeing.
    • I like that this episode highlighted the ramifications of what Eva and her rotten mama did. They were so focused on Ted and Nicole, not even realizing that other people would be affected. Eva thought nothing of what she did to Mona bc she was sure no on would hold anything against her but Mona is right in that they ruined her reputation with the Duprees. They dont blame her but they will likely never trust her judgement again. She has to walk by them feeling the guilt and shame that she'll never live down bc she unknowingly played a role in the hell that was unleashed. Not to mention the trauma and trust issues she no has bc she genuinely viewed Leslie as a friend   And poor Laura nearly died when she had that car accident and then had a heart attack and infection bc she was poisond. She's been recuperating for 3 months. She missed her trip to Hawaii and no idea what impact this has done on her relationship and her own plans but no on was thinking about that.   Eva and Leslie need to be made to feel like ish bc this was bigger than just Ted and Nicole
    • On May 12, 1989, the Dynasty series finale aired.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy