How unoriginal and gross! This smells like a copycat of the story Days did with Bo and Hope's child. Gawd, Jean and Chris need to leave ATWT already. They are destroying this show. And now they are aging the characters? I loved the kid who played Parker.

Daniel Manache would be a new JJ, since Dylan Denton is currently playing the role and has since JJ's debut on the show. I looked up Daniel Manache on IMDB, and there's no listing for him. Hmmm, I wonder if this is real. I hope not, this is too sick IMHO.

Edited December 17, 200618 yr by Mulder

I don't care whether it's intentional or an accident, either way, if this is true and J.J. really does kill Parker, it isn't original (hello Zack Brady), it's wrong. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking to it.

They can't kill Parker! They should kill JJ. After 2 years, his presence is still awkward and unneeded. He could pull a Bobby Martin and Carly would be better off.

Definitely not Parker! I agree about JJ, if anyone *has* to go, it should be him.

Why get rid of Parker just to keep Jack's mistress' son? Sorry, but if anyone should leave it should be JJ...I think that this is just dumb...hopefully, this better not be true.

I know what I have to say is controversial, but wouldn't killing off JJ make more sense since he has no real ties? I mean Jack was with his mother for what? a week?!

You may think it's controversial, but I have to agree. Killing Jennifer, then Benji/Hal, and now Parker? JJ has absolutely no ties to Oakdale besides Jack playing Daddy (he may have legally adopted him - I FF'd those Jack/JJ scenes ), but Parker is Carly's firstborn and Hal's son.

I have to admit that *if written well*, it could be an interesting story and meaty material for Maura West and Michael Park, but I'm hoping it will be the other way around.

First off, they need to quit aging the kids on the show. Pretty soon they're going to run out of children.

The whole children-killing-other-children concept is just really disturbing IMO. Sure, it's a good s/l for SVU, but for ATWT, I don't think it's appropriate. Besides, this type of s/l is not original. Other people mentioned the s/l on Days, but also this summer ATWT had a bunch of teenagers killed off by the slasher.

A part of me thinks that this is too outrageous to be true, but then a big part of me knows how stupid TIIC of this show really are. If they killed off Jen, then I could totally see them killing off Parker too. And if this is true, then it's obvious that they don't have any ounce of respect for the history of the show (not that we already didn't know that one ) Obviously, the writers can't write s/ls for Jack and Carly, so they decide to have one of their kids kill the other one? talk about messed up!

Edited December 18, 200618 yr by Ms. Walsh

then a big part of me knows how stupid TIIC of this show really are.

TRU DAT!!!

I got an email from SOD's ATWT editor, Jen Lenhart. She doesn't think it's true. I think she'd just not answer if it was true and she couldn't say anything.

Can't explain the article at all. Unless it's a vast, worldwide conspiracy...

It's also sick cause it's killing off another of Hal's children, first Jennifer(she's his even if it's not biologically) and then Parker? It's too much

Hmmmmm.....

Due to the big internet controversey, the article has now been changed!!!

Here's the revised portion:

On the day of our interview, Daniel said he’d just filmed a scene where he beats up his on-screen brother—this after his adoptive mother went to jail and his biological parents had both been killed (separately).

Power to the people!!!! I just hope it's not a smoke-screen. I can still hate on ThugJJ for beating up Parker. I suppose Parker sticks up for his mom, and ThugJJ reverts to his DNA. Great...Carly will have to deal with JJ more than her biological children when Maura gets back. Nothing can ever be about her kids...it's all about Skanky's precious leavings.

Seriously, that writer needs an editor.

Edited December 19, 200618 yr by P.J.

I've wanted J.J. gone from day one and this only reminds me why.