Jump to content

November 6-10, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree that the ratings may have been affected by the Election stuff, buttttttt I do think DAYS fans put a spin on the ratings every week so I have to agree with Evan in that respect. Or was it Greg? I don't know. Whoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok Steve but AMC might have done better on Thursday if not for the episode being a repeat. If everything went as it should, they may have had a larger number (2.4 or 2.5 perhaps) for that day if not for the preemption and having to repeat Wednesday. Everyone said they had a good week so that is possible so how can it be said AMC did better. We don't know that. Yes they held on to the number they had Tuesday but they may have done better for the week and on Thursday if everything stayed in place just like Days. The numbers for the week may have been held down because of the preemption. They might have gotten higher then a 2.3 for that episode if things were different. The only thing that can be claimed is that Days fans were split up between those that had the show Wednesday and chose not to watch Thursday due to a repeat and those that did not have the show Wednesday and tuned in Thursday to see the show.

Bottom line both Wed and Thur should not have been counted but they were and I am sure Days will rebound. It's unfair to compare AMC and Days because like others have said AMC had a decent week and the 2.3 might have been a low number for that episode if it was a good one. Days' Wednesday episode was nothing big so replaying it on Thursday was not going to help. AMC's Wednesday episode may have been a big one and that is why it did better but it may have done much better if not for the preemption.

Who cares-all the numbers suck :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Phoenix it is nothing to get mad about. I said I saw the point. The point I was trying to make that if one show can maintain and another can't that there has to be more to it than just the episode repeat. You can't just excuse the rating being bad and say well it would have been this or that without that happening.

And I agree that AMC's episode might have been better if they hadn't lost that day. Who knows - we will never know now. I would just rather see people look at the actual episode and say this may have been the reason some people didn't want to watch it twice rather than just excuse and say it was because of the preemption. Especially after another show that was affected the same way was affected the same way and maintained.

To me and no one has even brought them up, the one that was affected the most by the preemption was Bold & the Beautiful. In a large part of the country their show only aired for 5 minutes on Wednesday. CBS counted that day for them, and did not air that episode the next day. They went back to viewing as normal. They have that crappy 2.9 thrown in for Wednesday, but still they were able to maintain the same rating from last week.

And I agree all the numbers suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Phoenix I agree with everything you have said.

Also I have never tried to "spin" anything regarding DAYS' ratings...this is the only week where their drop can actually be attributed to something that was outside of the show's control and is ABSOLUTELY to blame for their drop (and this is whether or not AMC dropped, stayed the same or gained or whatever...I fail to see how AMC has ANYTHING to do with DAYS drops or whatever, if AMC fans chose to watch a repeated episode or whatever DOES NOT change the fact that DAYS still went down and I don't think the argument being used is very strong AT all!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that there are several reasons why Days ratings have not rebounded yet.

1. JER did major damage to this show and many viewers tuned out almost for self-preservation. I can't count how many times I would tune out in disgust over what I was seeing on my screen. I firmly believe these viewers won't be back until you prove to them long-term that Days is capable of writing good exciting stories. Hogie is a great writer and given time can probably write stories to lure these viewers back in the long run.

2. The permanent departure of the J&J fan base. True, many of these fans have left in dribbles and drabs over the past two years with Jack constantly dying and all. But Matt's final firing (and let's face it - the show could have kept him - for the Steve story at least) got rid of the final die-hards. I am no longer watching Days on a regular basis. If Matt comes back, I would watch but right now it is just too hard and just easier to give up on Days. This also negatively impacts the Steve/Kayla story because many of their fans were J&J'ers as well.

3. The anger caused by the sudden write-off of Austin/Carrie. Now, I have never been a fan of them but they do have a strong fan base. I know that many of these fans are probably angry they were fired and written off.

4. The slow plodding style of the Steve/Kayla story. This was the one story that could have hooked new viewers and kept old viewers but the story has been so darn slow and unsatisfying that it has been a major disapointment. And could someone give Billie her own love interest. Why is she stuck with everyone else's sloppy seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excellent points Irish. Seeing the rise in ratings at their return, I definitely think you are right with the 4th one. The others are valid too, but #4 really is. As I have said they created such a buzz around the show, but it fizzled when their story went nowhere. You can't bring a major character back, create a buzz around them, and then let them trod along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 Loved her. I've never seen her Doctors work. 
    • Valerie Mahaffey Dead: ‘Northern Exposure,’ ‘Dead to Me’ Actress Was 71 I just loved Valerie on my early '90s TV shows. This one gets me. 
    • I assume they did at some point during the finale...
    • Kelly was a horribly-written character overall. Just think, two Emmy-winning actresses (including Cynthia Watros, Nina, GH, and Annie, GL) couldn't make it work. Pamela is campy, but so are Dani, Vanessa, Leslie, and Joey. And, I don't want to be too judgy because my love for camp changes depending on the show. OLTL, DAYS, and some eras of GH had me rolling with the camp. However, Passions was overkill and I hated it. And, here, I can take it or leave it. It's ok in small doses (note to RC). I see this show as more of a serious drama.
    • I think one of the reasons that pilot didn't get picked up was because Vicki L was associated more with being Thelma Harper and playing older then she was playing her own age.  It was a blessing it didn't get picked up, or we would have been deprived of the syndicated era of Mama's Family.   Also, worth noting a Pre Night Court Marsha Warfield and pre Perfect Strangers Rebecca Arthur in the cast.  All talented women, but stuck with a bad script. And the other pilot had a pre Fran Fine.. Fran Drescher as the best friend.  I think that pilot might have been picked up if Karen Valentine and Fran Drescher switched roles.
    • So, on rewatch....did Rick and Mindy never have sex? 
    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy