Jump to content

September 18-22, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm not a Shelle fan at all and it would be really surprising if DAYS get a boost from the Mimi reveal. It's not like the majority of fans have been waiting for a Shelle reunion although this is where it seems the show is headed.

The Claire reveal took too long and was very anti-climatic since it was so predictable. It's hard to get a boost from something where the writers have more or less bludgeoned viewers to death about for almost a year - - does anyone really care about Claire or who her daddy is at this point. NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Your right Dayswoman and that is a reflection of today and the way soaps need to tell stories now.

Ten years ago fans were ok waiting nearly a year for a payoff. In fact, fans were ok waiting more then a year but now everything has to breakneck pace. This story was not and was dragged out so long. It would've been different if there were other story beats thrown in but it was basically Shawn is the dad, Philip is not and Mimi lied. Case closed. The in-vitro thing ties in a little bit but that didn't come along until recently and it was too late to throw any excitement into a story that was already just waiting to be ended.

I personally like waiting awhile for a story to climax because I like to invest as a fan and there is always something amazing about waiting for a huge story to end after months or years of waiting. That is what we got from JER's 1st run on Days. Part of the fun of the payoffs of his stories was we went years waiting for J&M's reunion and Sami's downfall. It added some punch to it but those stories also had more twists and turns that kept them interesting over a long period of time. Y&R used to tell long-drawn out stories as well until the last few years. It can't be done anymore though. Fans have more options and less time. Gone are the days when people watched a show out of loyalty and had some patience. There are still people like that, as you can see here on SON, but mostly they are a rare commodity.

I will disagree with you about Mimi's downfall. Days got rises in ratings all summer when nothing happened and for the week that so much happened they got nothing. The weeks you expect nothing you will get an increase so I am thinking/hoping that Days will get a +1 for this past week. Afterall, these things tend to happen when a show gets no rise for the week before when it deserved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks Toups for posting last weeks ratings. I am anxiously awaiting this weeks. I will root for Passions until the end and I am so hoping that it went up in some key demos. Hopefully the next couple of months will see a rise in the ratings for Passions as well as for Days of our Lives. I'm not going to start stressing about Passions until I see what the ratings are at renewal time. So the next couple of months are going to be pretty crucial for Passions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my personal opinion, Days is having a hard time for one major reason. On top of being promised that the vets would be featured more, when was the last time S/K, J/M, and some of the other vets have been featured? The show is light years ahead of where it was, but they need to start kicking in with the promised stories. But, the major reason? I have been trying to get a friend of mine to start watching Days once again, because it has improved greatly, but he keeps saying that he has been burned so many times by lousy writing on Days that he just can't see himself investing back into it. That seems to be the biggest reason why Days can't, for right now, climb up from Number 3.

But......at least it's at Number 3. Where was it at 6 months ago? Fighting for the bottom 3. So, for right now, even though I feel every Days fan, I'll take it.

But these stories need to start.

Now. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • These contract guarantees of 1 ep per month are ridiculous. How can you even have a story if your character apprars 4-5 times in a month? It's sad.
    • It's hard to tell with some actors appearing on average 4 times in a month whether they're recurring or just on a low guarantee contract. Someone recurring  like Beth Maitland can be used a lot for several months then disappear. So the monthly tallies aren't enough to go by.
    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy