Jump to content

Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

STUDIO 60 ON THE SUNSET STRIP - Episode Information and Ratings (Numbers are from Nielsen Media Research)

Episode 1.1: "Pilot"

Air Date: September 18, 2006

Written By: Aaron Sorkin

Directed By: Thomas Schlamme

Viewers: 13.41 million

18-49: 5.0/13

Episode 1.2: "The Cold Open"

Air Date: September 25, 2006

Written By: Aaron Sorkin

Directed By: Thomas Schlamme

Viewers: 10.83 million

18-49: 4.2/11

Episode 1.3: "The Focus Group"

Air Date: October 2, 2006

Written By: Aaron Sorkin

Directed By: Christopher Misiano

Viewers: 9.05 million

18-49: 3.5/9

Episode 1.4: "West Coast Delay"

Air Date: October 9, 2006

Written By: Aaron Sorkin & Mark Goffman

Directed By: Timothy Busfield

Viewers: 8.66 million

18-49: 3.7/9

Episode 1.5: "The Long Lead Story"

Air Date: October 16, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Dana Calvo

Directed By: David Petrarca

Viewers: 7.74 million

18-49: 3.1/8

Episode 1.6: "The Wrap Party"

Air Date: October 23, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Melissa Myers & Amy Turner

Directed By: David Semel

Viewers: 7.72 million

18-49: 3.2/8

Episode 1.7: "Nevada Day – Part 1"

Air Date: November 6, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Mark McKinney

Directed By: Lesli Linka Glatter

Location Directed By: Timothy Busfield

Viewers: 7.67 million

18-49: 3.3/8

Episode 1.8: "Nevada Day – Part 2"

Air Date: November 13, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: David Handelman & Cinque Henderson

Directed By: Timothy Busfield

Viewers: 7.58 million

18-49: 3.1/8

Episode 1.9: "The Option Period"

Air Date: November 20, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Christina Kiang Booth & Mark Goffman

Directed By: John Fortenberry

Viewers: 7.17 million

18-49: 3.1/8

Episode 1.10: "B-12"

Air Date: November 27, 2006

Written By: Aaron Sorkin & Eli Attie

Directed By: Bryan Gordon

Viewers: 7.27 million

18-49: 3.2/8

Episode 1.11: "The Christmas Show"

Air Date: December 4, 2006

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Christina Kiang Booth & Cinque Henderson

Directed By: Dan Attias

Viewers: 7.33 million

18-49: 2.9/8

Episode 1.12: "Monday"

Air Date: January 22, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Dana Calvo & David Handelman

Directed By: Lawrence Trilling

Viewers: 7.25 million

18-49: 3.1/8

Episode 1.13: "The Harriet Dinner"

Air Date: January 29, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Eli Attie

Directed By: Timothy Busfield

Viewers: 6.86 million

18-49: 3.0/8

Episode 1.14: "The Harriet Dinner – Part 2"

Air Date: February 5, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Mark Goffman & Dana Calvo

Directed By: John Fortenberry

Viewers: 7.10 million

18-49: 3.1/8

Episode 1.15: "The Friday Night Slaughter"

Air Date: February 12, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Melissa Myers & Amy Turner

Directed By: Thomas Schlamme

Viewers: 6.39 million

18-49: 2.8/7

Episode 1.16: "4AM Miracle"

Air Date: February 19, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Mark McKinney

Directed By: Laura Innes

Viewers: 6.11 million

18-49: 2.4/6

Episode 1.17: "The Disaster Show"

Air Date: May 24, 2007

Teleplay By: Aaron Sorkin

Story By: Dara Resnik Creasey & Chad Gomez Creasey

Directed By: Thomas Schlamme

Viewers: 3.9 million

18-49: 1.6/5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

I already saw the pilot and I totally loved it! The show has potential to become a TV classic with the great cast, brilliant directing and of course writing from the best writer is all of TV, Mr. Aaron Sorkin! Fans who loved The West Wing or Sports Night will love this show. It's classic Sorkin.

Minor Spoilers below.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30099

This show has been much covered on this site. The script and the screener have been reviewed here, and I have hailed it as the best of the season. More importantly, Broadcast and Cable polled 66 critics on the season’s best new series and “Studio 60 Live on the Sunset Strip” received more than four times as many votes as its closest runner-up.

As “West Wing” did, “Studio 60” gives us a president to love – but this time it’s network president Jordan McDeere (Amanda Peet), who dazzles with a series of fearlessly dead-perfect decisions even as the company she’s just joined seems to careen toward disaster. She is just one character, but she is my favorite, at least in the opener.

Mind you, the “Studio 60” pilot has its flaws (the teaser, especially, played a lot better on the page than it does as filmed), but it also stands head and shoulders above any other pilot I saw this year or last. As for future episodes, one has to put a lot of faith in any enterprise that emerges from the author of “A Few Good Men,” “The American President,” “Sports Night” and “The West Wing.”

But what matters Herc’s opinion?

USA Today gives it four stars (out of four) and says:

… What matters with Studio 60 is that it stars Matthew Perry, Bradley Whitford and Amanda Peet; it's directed by Thomas Schlamme; and it's written by Aaron Sorkin. And they're all at the top of their games. Teeming with rich characters and terrific actors, brimming with wit, drama and unexpected urgency, Studio 60 brings its workplace to full, immensely entertaining life.… There are times when Studio 60 is a little too self-important and self-referential. (It's impossible not to read Sorkin into Perry's character.) But while it is interested in the issues that are faced and stirred up by TV, it is definitely not a show about show business. This is a beautifully acted drama about the conflicts, pressures and joys that arise when people come together at work.

The New York Times says:

… what most distinguishes “Studio 60” is that it is as romantic about television as “The West Wing” was about politics. Mr. Sorkin has created a world where some things actually are as they seem, and even untrustworthy people have hidden valor. And he has taken two of the most easily caricatured female archetypes, an evangelical Christian entertainer and a sexy network executive, and made them as richly textured and captivating as the two male leads, maybe a little more so. …

The Los Angeles Times says:

… Sorkin, creator of "The West Wing," brings his intoxicating brio to the backstage world of a late-night TV series and conjures the place as the same roiling ground zero of social and moral debate that he projected onto the White House. …

The Washington Post says:

… Less than some of its parts, and a little long on shortcomings, "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip" nevertheless arrives with so much credible fanfare and such a hefty cadre of talent that even skeptics can reasonably expect future episodes to improve on tonight's more ho-hum than ho-ho premiere … The cast is formidable and seems to be using the premiere mainly as a warm-up, waiting for the really good scripts to come in. … Though it may not yet have achieved the level of devastating lampoonery, there is something electric in the air just because a network television show is taking both a sardonic and serious look at television as a medium and how it affects the people who work in it and, to a lesser degree, the millions of faithful who man their couches and clickers hoping for something that will stimulate them, one way or another. …

Variety says:

… it's hard not to root for "Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip," a series that weds Aaron Sorkin's crackling dialogue and willingness to tackle big ideas with a beyond-stellar cast. Sorkin's ear for the media's rules and excesses was a staple of both "The West Wing" and "Sports Night," and his exploration of an aging latenight franchise is so bracingly smart it's sure to hook discriminating viewers. … Even with his eccentricities, Sorkin infuses his stories with aspirational fervor (network execs exhibiting backbone? Go figure), his characters with brains and his rat-a-tat patter with an electricity that puts most primetime drama to shame. And if the show's sense of reality suffers amid those stagy, too-articulate exchanges, it's nevertheless an invigorating contrast when so much TV entails pacing around a chalk outline.

The Hollywood Reporter says:

… the launch of "Studio 60" - an ambitious and hugely entertaining drama - somehow tells us that the new fall season truly has begun. …

We give the last word to AICN’s own “Shelbygirl”:

Yeah, I know. Big deal. EVERYONE has seen the pilot, it's on NetFlix, etc... And if I still lived in Canada, this would be cool, too, because CTV is showing Studio 60 on Sunday nights, a day earlier than down here. But alas, I'm here, and not there, so this will be the only opportunity I have to review this show for AICN.

This will be a little different review. There are any number of places online where you can read about the plot, hell, even read basic pilot reviews. I want to go into a few observations about the show, about the Sorkin style, and what sadly lacks on TV that Sorking brings to the small screen.

I've been a fan of Sorkin since Sports Night. I sent the sad news to you WAY back when it was rumored that perhaps the show would be saved by cable (http://www.aintitcool.com/node/6275). When I was lying flat on my back recovering from a nasty, nasty virus, a few years ago and was able to watch all of Sports Night on DVD back to back to back. The West Wing had been on the air for a few years now, and

certain tendencies had begun to emerge with Sorkin's oeuvre.

Once you got past the painful laugh track in the first few episodes, what emerged was a smart, fast paced comedy filled with primary, secondary and tertiary characters that endeared themselves to you. There were story lines that seemed like they had been abandoned, only to be picked up the next season to great effect. There were many, many similarities that the short-lived comedy and the long-standing drama shared. Studio 60 is no exception.

There were a few things that always stood out for me about a Sorkin Show. The first thing is characters who were excellent at what they did (sports, production, speech writing, politicking) and absolutely horrible at most other things in life (mostly interpersonal

relationships). These people needed each other, mostly because no one else could really understand them, let alone put up with them. Sorkin once said that his characters would have success in their love lives when he did. The deep flaws that all of his characters

possessed, paired off with their super-human ability in their chosen field made each character memorable and lovable.

The second thing that Sorkin excelled at was creating outstanding female characters. One only needs to look at the "evolution" of the characters of CJ and the First Lady on The West Wing to see Sorkin's genius when it came to writing strong, complex women characters and not caricatures. All Sorkin's women are successful, and yet not; strong, and yet not; always absolutely human. Always fully developed and always written with a deep respect, Sorkin created women that we could all relate to.

The third thing Sorkin brings to TV is a fully developed universe behind the scenes. We see the same quirky assistants, the same helpers running around, the same faces, many, many faces, week after week after week. Sorkin creates entire, self-contained worlds that need virtually no suspension of disbelief in order to allow yourself to get swept up in them.

Studio 60 is no exception. I watched the pilot multiple times and rejoiced at the return of a Sorkin-created universe. Not only are the dialogue, characters, plot, etc, a treat, but We get to see some familiar faces who have appeared elsewhere in the Sorkin universe

(try to spot Leo's daughter!). The pilot contained all three of the main ingredients for the Sorkin trademark, which is so refreshing. The pilot makes you laugh, but the drama is present. While there is a dark streak that runs through Sorkin's comedy, it still has a lightness and dare I say hopeful aspect to it that appeals to so many viewers. There is no doubt great drama on TV right now, not much great comedy, but so few that a) combine both and B) manage to do so with such lightness and effortlessness.

But what I found makes Studio 60 so special is the personal nature that this show implies. The two main characters, Matt and Danny (played by Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford respectively) are a writing/directing team who won't work without the other, mirroring the relationship between Sorkin and his go-to director Tommy Schlamme. There are a few other parallels that are revealed in the pilot that I won't spoil here, but is interesting to see a professional and deeply personal relationship recreated in the show.

I wonder how much is personal to the writer himself. I would think quite a bit.

Another interesting parallel is how Matt and Danny are brought back to NBS (the imaginary station) after being unceremoniously "dismissed" (there is some debate as to whether they quit or were fired) in order to save the show and the station. Sound a little like Sokin and Schlamme being unceremoniously "dismissed" from The West Wing and then brought back to NBC in order to save the station? Jack Rudolph, played by Steven Webber, is the network suit who pissed them off the first time, but has to watch them come back into the

fold, knowing that they do represent the saviors. Fact and fiction collide! Because Studio 60, I think, can save the network. It's that good.

I could say a lot about all of the other characters, but I think I will leave it at that. What's bad? The nagging fear that I have when watching the pilot that this is all too good to be true and will flame out before we want it to. Who will pull a Rob Lowe? Will

there be dissension in the writing room? Will the network botch it (it would be hard, but who knows!)? I'm being pessimistic, but I am so positive about the show that I am terribly fearful for it's future. TV has let me down over the course of my life, and this would be too much to bear.

Do what you like with this. It's long, it's rambling, but the show inspired nothing less than that in this humble pseudo-reviewer.

Thanks, herc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I 100% agree that Bill and Haley's set would work better as a bedroom. I also think it might have made more sense to give them a penthouse instead of a mansion. Realistically they aren't going to have the room for multiple mansions, even with the larger studios. A more open concept penthouse would've been fine. I also wish more people lived together. The age confusion kinda messes that up but I would at least have Chelsea living with Dani. If Martin were Anita and Vernon's child (as he should be), I'd have these families living together as well. By doing that, the space used for Martin and Smitty's house could be used to build a dining room for the Dupree home and I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to throw a couple bedrooms in as needed.
    • CBS primetime was such a mess in the 1990s. 1990/91 fourth consecutive third place finish. 1991/92 to 1993/94 some signs of life but it didn't last.  1994/95 to 1999/2000 another primetime mess era. 1995 the sale to Westinghouse and Les Moonves arrived. The only bright spots were Touched by an Angel becoming a Top 10 show and Everybody Loves Raymond starting to show growth. CBS primetime would have a comeback in 2000 with the premieres of Survivor and CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond becoming a Top 10 show, and the rest is history.
    •  Thanks! For some reason I had misremembered ER and Chicago Hope going directly head to head but that may have been because of the hype about both shows.    Poor Connie Chung. She seem poised for success and possibly the next Barbara Walters. I don’t recall her co-anchor gig on the CBS Evening News was well received though. She kind of tanked her career moving into more a tabloid journalist role once at ABC and especially once she moved off network TV to CNN and later more infamously on MSNBC. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Strangely, it was Phillip who invited Evie to go to the ball with him. She had been taking care of Samantha, so I guess it was a way to thank her for helping Justin after Jackie's death? So she was not invited by Vanessa. Phillip brought her as his plus one. That Evie stayed on the canvas so long is extremely odd, especially since Ben was gone way before her. My theory is Marland was going to bring Rita back, so they wanted Evie to remain in place as her sounding board. When he left and Potter was still EP, that might have still been the plan. Once Kobe came in, that would have been thrown in the dumpster along with a lot of other story plans and characters.
    • Nina and Portia are generally presented as entirely too savvy to not think this ketamine (don't even GET me started on that) nonsense wouldn't immediately blow up in their face. Drew, the ex-navy seal and congressman, wouldn't get a drug test immediately after acting wildly out of character? Portia allowed this to so easily be traced back to her by roping in Brad, a man who can't stand her? Nina didn't think Willow would Stand By Her Man? Girl, PAY ATTENTION! I also find it disturbing how BOTH of them are gaslighting Willow. It feels gross. They should have presented Gio as anything other than a responsible, genial and affable guy if they wanted us to buy any of Dante's ranting about him. You've known this kid since he was a baby and suddenly you're yelling at him like he's the devil incarnate? It was so forced. Every one of them, including Dante, know that they all would have done the same thing in Gio's shoes. Teen gets drunk, friends cover for them. Gio's only 5 years older than him, barely allowed to legally drink himself. How was he to know the kid had alcohol poisoning? Alexa Havins crying every day over keeping a baby secret. Ahh memories. Molly and Kristina are just the worst to their mom and Alexis allows it. Kristina does need to be committed, she's a danger to herself and others. I wish Alexis would just tell her that she knows. I can't wait until Molly finds out about her almost getting Ric and Liz killed. I need her to body slam Kristina. Sasha thinks she knows EVERYTHING. She's always giving advice and painted as right no matter what. And so holier than thou while carrying a married man's baby.
    • Correction, Chicago Hope 1994/95 was initially Thursday 9 pm, a CBS dead zone and head-to-head w/ Seinfeld. 1994/95 CBS Thursday 10 pm initially was Eye to Eye with Connie Chung. Later in the season CBS did a scheduling shift with Chicago Hope moving to Monday 10 pm, Eye to Eye with Connie Chung moving to Thursday 9 pm, and 48 Hours moving from Wednesday 10 pm to Thursday 10 pm.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A--I wish someone would post a better vid of the entire ball, as it must be out there. And B--nope. Evie is only in a small segment of the ball with Phillip, Rick and Mindy. She doesn't dance at all. Ross dances with Helena and Amanda. I'm not even sure why Evie is at the ball---Vanessa heartily disliked her. I did see that Billy actually asked Henry to introduce him to Vanessa, which I hadn't realized.
    • Honestly, they should've ordered more of 2000 Malibu Road for the 1992-93 midseason and aired it when Knots went on a break. That was probably their best shot.    Then of course they fumbled Central Park West by airing it in the 9PM slot instead of a 10PM slot where it would've been away from the Fox dramas. CPW got its best rating by airing randomly on a Sunday and when it was taken off the air for a "re-tooling", Party of Five's ratings actually had a spike, so clearly they were feeding off each other. But being a smaller network focused on a certain demographic, Fox could afford to be patient Party of Five, CBS couldn't... 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy