Vee

It's easy to sit back and count your money when it's all been perpetuated by a man who made it his career ambition to grind women and women's voices down when he couldn't assault them. Julie Chen Moonves just turned Camille Cosby into a picture of restraint.

Genuinely curious to see if she has a job in the next 48 hours.

Always good to see Lecy, etc.

I probably would've voted for Nixon if I was still in NY, but her campaign made a number of mistakes and I am so, so, so tired of the angry white progressive journos whining and gnashing their teeth on Twitter every time their guy/girl loses and making it an all or nothing proposition. Yes, Cuomo sucks. Yes, I would've voted for Nixon. Yes, she made major mistakes. And yes, the will of the actual public has to be acknowledged and not condescended to or blamed. You don't get to blame Democratic voters for actually coming out and voting Democratic. Meanwhile:

I can't stand Cuomo, but Nixon's crew blaming high Democratic voter turnout on losing is peak Bernie Sanders.

Fúck her.

Travis Schuldt was The Worst on Passions. Eric Martsolf was twice as hot and came off like Olivier by comparison.

This is a jawdropper from the above:

Martin Campbell! That's a shocker, I loved his work on the original Edge of Darkness and the Bond films.

I always thought that was Sharon Gless, myself. But it could well be Stefanie Kramer.

I said this the other day, but all this just makes me that much more curious how Diane English and Murphy Brown - which tapes only a few weeks ahead specifically so that it may take on current events, and which has intended to tackle #MeToo - will handle all this. They can't fail to.

I was just wondering how and why Linda Bloodworth-Thomason fell off so hard when she came up here not long ago. Now we know, and I should've known. But it's the same story with women like Janet Jackson, like Annabella Sciorra as a rising movie star in the '90s. We know now what happened to them. These men happened to them. That one was especially crazy.

Wow.

I don't think this is in any way some sort of double swerve to try to help the GOP - with the exception of Politico and some of the folks at the NYT, I don't think the media is interested in that so much as they get completely blinkered by Beltway thinking (which invariably leads to conservative sympathizing) and the horse race and treat things like a big game. Some journalists know it isn't. Some never will. And I do think most of the media want the GOP out of control of the House if only to stopgap Trump - I think most major media personalities do believe the GOP is corrupt and out of control and need to be handicapped this year. That doesn't mean they'll ever stop criticizing Democrats first once it's done. Like what we now see at Facebook, it is about the press' constant fear of 'liberal bias' and a generational slant towards not only conservative thought, but more importantly overcorrecting and reporting the conservative viewpoint to prove they are not 'too liberal.' What they've never understood is the GOP will never stop calling them liberal. I think the article is an accurate summation of the GOP's fears. Do I think they will lose the Senate? Probably not. But it is in play and I hope we can make it very close.

A recent quote from TP producer Sabrina Sutherland, who is very close to Lynch:

Meanwhile, in 1990: