Jump to content

DAYS: March 2025 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 478
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I was inadvertently amused when Joy told Philip that she brought breakfast because he worked late.  Meanwhile, there was a full scene the other day dedicated to Alex, Xander, and Philip closing early.  And today, hardworking Philip went to go talk to his Mommy less than an hour after he arrived at the office.  The guy's not exactly breaking a sweat over there at Titan Industries.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, Maggie volunteers at Statesville? OK

Please register in order to view this content

Her scenes with Sarah were good but I still don’t see why Maggie’s not doing what she can to help save the hospital. 

Xander knowing that Philip and Stephanie are keeping a secret from Alex could be interesting though, and adds another dynamic to the Kiriakis family storyline and I like that. The messier, the better lol and I also think that there was some more foreshadowing about Stephanie and Xander too.

As for Joy, idk. I wouldn’t mind her being on the canvas but if this is it for her, I wouldn’t mind that either. I wonder if there was any thought put into her character, other than that Body&Soul nonsense. It actually feels similar to what happened with Talia; a character  being introduced for a storyline that ultimately fails and not knowing what to do her with afterwards. Or maybe there was interference, especially with the way that the thing with Johnny and Chanel was just dropped, and Ron just quit caring. Who knows? Maybe it’s for the best though; she doesn’t need more writing that makes her look bad in order to make Alex look good. Plus, we don’t need more Nancy bashing either. As for the baby, she should just get an abortion. 

And, Theresa’s gone too? Just like that? If she was only gonna be in it for like 3 episodes, then what was the point of this? Were Ron and Jamey just trying to be funny again or something?

This just seems so unnecessary now, along with giving Kim cancer once again. There’s ton of potential story for Theresa (and none for Gwen) as we saw in the scenes that she had with Brady and Tate. Those scenes were the best part of today, and I wish that the show would continue to explore the relationship between her and Tate. We got to see Brady and Tate’s relationship on full display today and it was great. I really enjoyed their conversation about John and how John would be there for Tate, Sophia, etc. if he knew that Sophia was pregnant.

And, Tate looked hot too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days dictionary....

Hot means shirtless

Yes Tate looked hot today!

Please register in order to view this content

That's all got for today's episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually really like the actress that plays Joy and think she does a good job.   I had been wanting the show to cast Joy for years.  It was just such an odd time to bring the character on.  Craig, Nancy, and Chloe are all in New York.  There is no reason for her to be in Salem at all.

Alexann Hopkins could be playing any random young female.   Outside of her disdain for her own mother we really haven't heard much about her relationship with her family or Chloe or Craig.  Chloe was on and off the show for decades in ridiculous stories and the show brings her sister and Phillip back now that Nadia's gone lol?  Honestly this whole Rachel Sr. plot would make a bit more sense if little Rachel was going after Chloe and not Ava.   At least Chloe/Brady have a long history and little Rachel has hated her for years.

Anyhow, considering Nadia always comes back no matter how badly the show treats her I am sure we will see Chloe again.   There really needs to be someone in town that grounds Joy and makes me care about her more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 



unproven random *speculation/theory* that they were going to have Chloe arrive with Joy, but Nadia wasn't available, so they reassigned some of the planned scenes to other characters... and they reassigned Chloe/Brady to Ava/Brady, which made zero sense to me.
If Chloe were in Salem, then the whole storyline of Joy being conceived in order to get bone marrow to save Chloe from leukemia -- could have created an interesting dynamic with them as adult women, and especially now (if) Joy is pregnant.  I think without Chloe, that Joy just doesn't have enough meaningful connection on the canvas. 

(On a side note, bringing in Joy for Body&Soul was also pointless, but that's because Body&Soul itself was entirely pointless.)

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great post.

I have no reason to invest in Joy. 

Like u said she has no ties in town and her story and pairing with awful RSW is beyond terrible.

This soap has a lot of characters who I have no reason to invest in due to storyline reasons or past behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That would have made a whole lot more sense, so Days probably didn't think of it lol.

Chloe on canvas would also help solidify Joy's connections with Phillip, Brady, and even Xander.  Instead of Joy just saying, oh so and so used to date my sister we could see Joy react to Chloe being around them.   It would definitely give Joy more depth because at this point she is just randomly inserted into different scenarios that just make me think the show has no idea what to do with her.  Ending the Nancy bashing would also make me much happier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like her, too, it's unfortunate that her story (such as it is) was so ill-conceived. I imagine the character will be back at some point with Alex's spawn in tow, probably in conjunction with Chloe's biennial return. I think Alexann Hopkins will have gone on to greener pastures by then, though. 

 

Yes, this seemed pointless. And I hate that Kimberly is given another medical crisis -- even if it is off canvas --- to usher Theresa off.

I really liked yesterday's suggestion here that it's Drew, not Shane, we've seen the past two days. But, alas, I don't think that's the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've got this clip I love of 2 of my DAYS dames, Julie & Chloe, which I cannot find at the moment but I can find the clip where Chloe & Brady are talking after "that other" clip, so here's just a little thing from DAYS 2017. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just an added incentive to watch

As for that Days dictionary, got any other words to include in there?

After today, I’m not so sure either. 

He actually seemed concerned about Kim, as opposed to how off putting he was yesterday

I wish that would’ve happened.

Plus, it would’ve been a lot more interesting to see than Body&Soul 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And, y'all, the guys, spend a fair amount of time appreciating your eye candy. I'd love to have Nadia back because she's like my best EYE CANDY, not even just in all caps but with confetti & a disco ball & strobe lights!!! YASS BABEEE.

Plus, just about everything is more interesting than the BS that was B&S!!! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed.  I was with you yesterday, but today I questioned the Drew theory.  This news would explain Shane's cold behavior.  He was looking at Kim's test results/file, not John's.  

I don't know why he wouldn't tell Steve and Marlena though.  Historically Marlena and Kim were super close (much closer than Marlena/Kayla) so obviously Marlena would have been extremely sympathetic as would Steve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

That was really goodbye to Theresa and Joy?

On a random Wednesday.

Joy's never going to get a good letter of recommendation if she quits a job on the second day of work.

I wonder if they'll re-cast because they can't just ignore the baby?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
    • I actually love the new fashion.
    • Admittedly, I was a latecomer to ATWT (first becoming a regular viewer in 2000). But I really liked KMH's Emily. I thought she was a very specific kind of neurotic professional character, and I loved her prickly relationship with MM's Susan. I will say I don't think the show did her any favors after Hal died, stranding her in storylines with several of the show's dullest characters: nu-Paul, nu-Meg, and nu-Dusty. I actually quite liked one of her last major storylines, when she discovered she had a grown-up biological son with Larry named Hunter. But then Hunter just sort of disappeared, and the story fizzled out, which was pretty typical of the late Goutman years. 
    • I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.
    • Well, her staff pointing out the movie connection never seemed to stop Long from using those plots.  She was right about Vanessa--she needed a man who loved her, which she'd never really had up to then. But as others have pointed out, Long borrowed heavily from Taming of the Shrew to get it done. (which while I kinda disputed that, I get more now, having watched Kiss Me Kate a few times since.)
    • "Holly had her share of the blame..." NO, she did NOT. WOW. That's what you get for trying to be fair and giving these people the benefit of the doubt! The Rita rape episodes do not seem to be available. It sounds like Calhoun thought it was not dramatized, but it was. I saw it when it aired. Yes, it's close to 50 years ago, and memories aren't 100% reliable. I also know that Zaslow reportedly complained that it was written too much like a seduction and that's why the Dobsons portrayed Holly's rape differently. Maybe it started like a seduction and she rejected him and that's when it turned violent. I don't remember that part, if it exists. What I do remember is that Roger threw Rita so violently to the floor that she hit her head. They showed him coming at her from her point of view and he looked all fuzzy. It was an act of violence, not a seduction. Rita kept it a secret until it looked like Roger might be acquited, and then finally admitted it. She didn't make it up, it definitely was not a ploy.
    • I was actually referencing another scene between Roger and Alex, which I think is right after they marry.  But yeah---I'm not really impressed with Calhoun's reasoning. Or the "both recall it wasn't unprovoked" line. Wasn't Holly trying to leave him when he raped her? Oy vey.
    • I know we have discussed the location of Bay City in the Another World thread and the fact that originally Irna conceived of it as being the real Bay City MI, and it was later writers that treated it as a fictional Bay City [probably IL]. This article seems to suggest that that idea was well-established by 1981. I wonder when it started.
    • Desert Sun, 22 December 1983 Guiding Light’ writer looks for fresh ideas By TOM JORY Associated Press Writer NEW YORK (AP) - “Guiding Light” has been a daytime companion for millions since 1937, starting on radio and switching to TV after 15 years. Can anything new, really new, ever happen to the Bauers or the Reardons or any of the other folks in Springfield? “I get really upset,” says Pamela Long Hammer, principal writer for the CBS soap opera since March, “because I’ll come up with this neat scenario and someone will say, ‘That’s like “Strangers on a Train.’” “I think, ‘They keep stealing my material.’ “The way I figure it,” she says, “there are only so many stories in the world. It’s the characters who keep the show new and exciting. All of our stories come from them: I don’t come up with a plot, and then work a character into it.” Continuity is important. Someone out there surely knows all that’s happened, to everyone on the show, in 46 years. How about Miss Long Hammer? "Nope. I care about what our core families have been doing,” she says. “I’m always interested in what happened to Bert Bauer (played since 1950 by Charita Bauer) 20 years ago, but as far as going back and reading scripts, no. “Others on the show keep track,” she says. “I’ll suggest something, and be told, ‘You don’t remember, but five years ago, they had this terrible fight. They would never speak to one another now.”’ Miss Long Hammer, a former Miss Alabama who came to New York as an aspiring actress in 1980, began writing for daytime television while playing Ashley on NBC’s “Texas.” She eventually wrote herself out of the story. Her staff for “Guiding Light” includes nine writers, among them her husband, Charles Jay Hammer, whom she met while both worked on “Texas.” NBC dropped “Texas” after two seasons, and episodes from the serial currently are being rerun on the Turner Broadcasting System’s cable-TV SuperStation, WTBS. Gail Kobe, who was executive producer of “Texas,” now has the same job on “Guiding Light.” And Beverlee McKinsey, who played Iris Carrington in “Another World” on NBC, and later in "Texas,” will join the Light” cast of the CBS soap in February. Miss Long Hammer is reponsible for the long-term story, which can mean looking ahead 18 months or more. Staff writers deal with specifics, including the scripts for individual episodes. She says she draws on “imagination and instinct” for the “Guiding Light” story. Often, that involves inventing new characters. “‘I look at Vanessa (Maeve Kinkead), one of our leading ladies,” Miss Long Hammer says. "What could make the audience care more about her? “Then I think, ‘Why can’t she find a man she can love, who will also love her?’ Voila, here comes Billy Lewis (Jordan Clarke). “Another example,” she says, “is Alan Spaulding (Christopher Bernau). All of a sudden, he’s got a sister no one ever knew about. “They come complete,” says Miss Long Hammer of the serial’s characters, including the new ones. “We know who they are and where they came from long before the viewer gets all that information. That’s one of the most interesting things about daytime, the complexities of the characters.” The writers make a big effort to keep the show contemporary, and four of the leading players are in their late teens or early 20s Judi Evans, who plays Beth Raines, Kristi Tesreau (Mindy Lewis), Grant Aleksander (Philip Spaulding) and Michael O’Leary (Rick Bauer). “Guiding Light,” longevity notwithstanding, is a moderate success by that ultimate yardstick of the industry; ratings. The show is behind only “General Hospital,” “All My Children” and “One Life to Live,” all on ABC, and CBS’ “The Young and the Restless,” among soaps. And Miss Long Hammer says she’s convinced writing is the key to even greater achievement. “When I say I love the characters, it’s not a light thing,” she says. “I think what the audience senses is an enthusiasm and an energy among the people who do the show.”
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy