Jump to content

The Tracy Quartermaine Lovefest


razor32always

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I didn't watch yet, but my friend who is the insider said the intent of the scene was to show that luke really did sign it and she saw it and realized it and realized the true depth of their love for each other etc and threw it in the fire as he ultimate symbol of trust--for what it is worth that is what she told me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

GRRR… finally saw it and WTF were the mobbies doing taking over LuNacy's day. I'm SOOOOOO glad both Lulu and Tracy said how rude that was, because it was. Luke's reaction was funny - and gives a little insight into some of his other so-called non-chalant reactions to Sonny's stupidity. Perhaps Luke isn't as amused as he appears.

Also nice touch between Brook and Luke. I've been wanting a scene forever where Brook calls Luke her grandfather, and it's almost exactly like I envisioned it would be, lol.

As for the pre-nup, Luke TOTALLY signed it. He might have undersigned it Coyote, but there is no way Tracy would have reacted like that to a false name. In the end she knew he gave her everything she asked for, and she gave him what he wanted. It was a beautiful scene of love, honesty, and commitment. And tell me - when was the last time we had a scene with absolutely no dialogue what-so-ever? That was perfect.

The music thing - that's a reason to call TPTB and complain. The wedding was beautiful, the reception was mostly wonderful, but LuNacy theme song is for them alone - not Dante and Brenda.

Edited by remos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^ no, montages don't count, not like this. This was a full scene, two people only with a full chunk of the story being told. Montages are usually snippets of the story or moments of follow-up, but they don't tell any story in and of themselves.

I'm serious, I can't remember any soap doing what they allowed JE and TG to do today. That is huge trust in the actor's abilities that they left the entire scene without dialogue. Perhaps my Liturgist background is influencing me here, but it's noted that Westerners have a really hard time with silence. Easterners seem to be comfortable in it, but Westerners tend to get really antsy if there isn't something being said. So to allow an entire scene without any intervention is an amazing compliment. Can you imagine Brenda being give that? Or Carly? Or bless her heart, Lulu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok, so after watching the last 2 minutes of todays episode like 20 times, there isn't a doubt in my mind that Luke signed his real name. I know when Alexis called him Wiley E. Coyote that I thought that was the name he signed, but after seeing Tracys reaction to seeing the pre-nup he did sign his real name. And I agree with remos and funny, the silence between them in that scene was priceless. I LOVED, LOVED, LOVED IT!!! :wub::wub::wub:

Edited by nex4evr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Incredible :wub::wub::wub::wub::wub:

I have no words! Haha. It was such an amazing scene. I remember asking for a love scene for this wedding, and I got pretty darn close. It was beautiful. I loved how passionate they were. Hearing her sob as she is kissing him, and then he puts his hands on her waist. I was almost gone. I was thinking, ok, let's steer them toward the bedroom now. I was beginning to think they might do it on the floor. Then, the camera cut away to Dante. That angered me. I am thrilled that Tracy finally recognizes that Luke truly loves her. Yeah, he loves money, but he loves her most of all. Oh, how breathtaking. Thank you, GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

okay. I've now rewatched multiple times, too.

it makes more sense now if you assume he signed his real name. Her emotion at the end is even more poignant... but.. but....

it's not clear. It should be clearer. If you assume Luke signed his "real name," then she should have reacted slightly differently when she read the document... a gasp...something.

Ugh.

Edited by LaineyBev714
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy