Jump to content

DAYS: December 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 485
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I don't mind Gabi and always liked CB, but I don't feel a need for a recast.  Gabi hasn't done anything noteworthy in months.  It's a shame that CB was treated badly-I just don't know where else Gabi has to go on the show.  Her and Stefan stupidly plotting for Dimera was not interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed

There should be some resolution for Gabi, but I wouldn't mind a Stefan and Sloan or Stefan and Ava pairing, as both characters possess similar qualities to Gabi.

Also, can we get consensus?  Is it Stefan, Stefon, or Stephon?  I keep seeing it written in every different way.  I assume Stefan, since it is Stefan O. Dimera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks @Liberty City

I'm terrible with remembering all the Nikki, Niki, and Nickys, as well as the Vicky, Viki, and Vicki's

Also, I just finished today's episode 5.5/10, no noticeable difference with the scab writers.

Positives:  I'm happy that Chanel is not oblivious to Holly's manipulation.  She's too savvy to get played by a teen with her first crush.

Negative:  The Jackie Cox stuff makes everyone seem ridiculous.  And Leo's epiphany over delivering Nicole's baby is just plain stupid.  If Leo becomes an OB-Gyn, I may need to scream.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The strike stuff is coming in stages.

Ron wrote up to or including Christmas so his storyline concepts will air til then, and he'll be credited til his ideas are no longer airing.

The breakdown writers will continue to be credited for another week or two for however long their prewritten stuff is - whatever they turned in before the May 2nd strike start.  The writing staff was still credited today Dec. 4.
(but no specific scriptwriter credited today)

The scriptwriters writing individual episodes are no longer credited effective today December 4th, as the day-to-day scripts now airing were written starting May 2nd by non union people --
either former union people gone fi-core, and/or random people who were never union writers

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which also leads to Nik & Nic & Nick. 

I was looking at my notes from Patrick Mulcahey & just like Adam Huss is married to Adam Huss, Patrick Mulcahey is married to Patrick Mulcahey. 

@janea4old   Great explanation!

Edited by Donna L. Bridges
more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's my Facebook post:

FIRST STRIKE SCRIPT AIRED TODAY...

The first strike-affected script of "Days" aired today (December 4). All of the dialogue (script) writers were removed from the credits. As Jason47 had reported earlier this year, the script writers would be the first writers to disappear from the credits, since they submit their scripts after the breakdowns are written. The remaining writers are still in the credits as of today. In the 2007-2008 strike, the dialogue writers reappeared for an episode or two after initially disappearing, so it is possible another script or two was finished and submitted before the strike began in May (they are submitted around the same time, but not always exactly in airdate order), so another episode or two might have the dialogue writers listed again later this week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What else? #May4th

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • In my usual account on my most used video hosting site with the video title  DAYS 1-8-15 Will & Paul Sex This is an edit I began when I was first teaching myself to edit & at that time I couldn't make it do what I wanted it to do. I pulled it up & finished it this morning. 
    • Or Megan is shot as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts...while Julie confesses she's the biological mother of Special Guest Star Barry Bostwick's little boy.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy