Jump to content

General Hospital: August 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

GH keeps taking too long with a couple to the point where an actor leaves. They did it with Spencer and the first Teina, they did it with Jason and Brott, and now they're doing it again with new Trina and Spencer who'se actor is leaving.

Edited by Planet Soap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will be so pissed if they update Kelly’s and it no longer feels like someplace Ruby would be. This is not supposed to be a fancy or modern location.

Who is Carly supposed to be?  Because it is wild watching her work at Kelly’s and not being devastated by her turn of events. And all of sudden, without any adjustment. What also doesn’t make sense is that Carly should be finding herself another rich man and blowing up personal relationships to get him. Which creates more story for her and is very in character. This would have required planning ahead and good casting.

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe their biggest problem is that they think they can make it up as they go along. Liz's parents & the Reiko story, the Hook, the year-long leukemia story & even the revenge porn shaggy dog case all would tend to suggest that - guess what - you have to decide on one ending ahead of time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really mind Carly going back to her humble roots.  I agree that we didn't exactly get a personal progression from her.  It was circumstances that led her to this, not any self-reflection.  I actually do think it's more interesting than her going and finding another rich man.  I don't think it will last long or that we will see Carly behind the counter at Kelly's for years to come, but I do think it's something LW plays more convincingly than upper class rich princess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don’t mind the idea, but we needed to see her humbled much more before being reborn as Coffee Carly.

Maybe I’m just salty because she and Sonny ruled the show for so long and never really got brought down as far as they should have been. Now she’s pouring coffee and he’s carrying his new lady’s handbag and meddling like Amy Vinning in everyone’s business. It’s rough to watch for me.

I have sat through many shaky soap storylines over the years where at least the characters were in character or going on an emotional journey. I actively hated a lot of Guza’s 2000’s work. But at least day to day there was strength!

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, it was almost too easy for Carly.  She did lose the Metro Court, but she was going to lose her house and Bobbie swooped in and saved the day.  It's just hard because there is no possible way Jax or Sonny would let the mother of their child/children live like that.  There isn't any plausible scenario Carly would be destitute just on child support payments for Donna alone. 

I really can't stand the way the show uses Sonny currently.  He hasn't fallen from grace or been punished, but you are correct, he follows NINA of all love interests around all day.

Guza had so many faults and I was over him.  However, he did bring an excitement to the show.  Sweeps meant something to him, and he did excel at full cast disaster arcs.  Was it violent, misogynistic, and ridiculous most of the time?  Yes, but things happened, and I don't feel like things happen very quickly or often right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This Kristina recasting gets better every day.  I loved her scenes with Joss!  Finally, a fun new rivalry.  All four of the characters (plus Baby Ace) today in Kelly's are a joy to watch.  

GranMolly's surrogacy story is going to be insufferable.  That coupling was better off-screen all these years, popping up briefly to talk about their not-marriage "domestic partnership" and then disappearing.

There was some bad editing in the Curtis scenes.  You could clearly see his legs move.

Please register in order to view this content

How old is Olivia supposed to be?  She used to party with Lois at Studio 54 when Lisa LoCicero was 10?! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Hotel would have the similar demos as Dynasty W 19-49 would have been strong. St Elsewhere survived b/c it attracted wealthier/urban viewers and The Equalizer was probably stronger with men and younger viewers. So each had their own niche-good counter-programming. As for Aaron Spelling's influence over ABC in terms of scheduling, I don't know if he would have been happy with Charlie's Angels moving to Sunday, The Colbys scheduled on Thursdays or Matt Houston moved to Fridays. I think he just had to roll with the punches.
    • Thank you @Broderick. That information was so helpful. I watched the first episode of the "Mansion of the Damned" storyline. I was extremely confused by Margaret Colin's Paige and her relationship to other characters. Your post helps me understand what's happening. The rest of the show was easy to understand and I'm enjoying it. Hunter's Nola is a good character for me since I know Kim Hunter from other work.  I must have seen clips of Edge of Night before because I remember seeing April. 
    • How is it back tracking when it was in fact the word I originally used? It's not.
    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy