Jump to content

Days: July 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 487
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Double weddings are really weird to me.  Why would you want to share that day?  Period.  These 4 barely know each other, but I think it's just a strange concept in general.  The only case I could sort of understand it is in when Carrie/Austin and John/Marlena did it.  They've both had weddings to one another a million times so why not? 

I guess we have to see how the Sloan stuff plays out on Monday because it seemed massively stupid to me too @j swift And, honestly, I liked both the wedding dresses.  Jada's dress was fabulous though.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shout out to Richard Bloore, Costume Designer, DAYS! All 3 dresses were fabulous! I did not like Leo's suit but it does look like something he would wear. 

Loved Kristen's line, to Dimitri: "You know, they say it's bad form to text with your boyfriend on your wedding day when you're about to marry the woman of your dreams." 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It goes without saying that they are all beautiful women, but I am biased against brides wearing their hair down under a veil, I think it looks messy.  It also seemed like Kristen and Jada were dressed for an evening wedding, but Gabi wasn't.  And I guess nobody upholds the tradition of not wearing white when it is your third or fourth wedding.

On the subject of double weddings, the only reference that I have is that I grew up in a temple where due to the number of kids getting Bat Mitvah-ed we all had to share the date.  Given that I don't like a lot of attention in large crowds, I appreciated it, even if I can't recall the girl's name that I shared the day with, even if you offered me half of Dimitri's inheritance. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Gabi's dress was supposed to more artsy or avant-garde since she's a designer or something.  I prefer hair down under a veil lol.  

I remember Days used to change up the color slightly for brides on their third or fourth wedding day.  I feel like Sami, Carrie and Hope at least all had slightly beige-y colors for their dresses and Marlena wore light blue to her "main" John wedding in 99.  I guess it just doesn't matter anymore lol.

I have honestly never known anyone in real life who had a double wedding.  I actually have never heard of it outside of tv shows or movies.  If anyone on this board knows someone who's done it in real life let me know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would hope that Dimitri split the cost with Stefan, but given that there were no centerpieces, catering, or invitations, it didn't seem that costly.

Marlena's blue gown is iconic, as memorialized in Rachel's doll.

Barbie DAYS OF OUR LIVES Marlene Evans BLUE SATIN WEDDING DRESS Fashion ONLY

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The etiquette of a double wedding seems difficult to maneuver.  Do you have double maids-of-honor?  Do the guests need to send two gifts?  It seems especially awkward to share such an intimate moment while your Mom's also in a bridal gown.

Personally, I would turn down the invitation to a double wedding because much like the one on Passions, the ceremony would take forever to complete (and someone might crash their car into the event).

Finally, I agree that if you're looking for realism, or erudite dialogue, DAYS may not be for you.  From Micky's amnesia on a farm to Marlena's twin taking over her identity, DAYS never tried to be a realistic soap.  It is a silly diversion made better because we can discuss it as a community.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would say that DAYS has always had realism in their friend & family relationships. No not realistic in how bizarrely people are kin to each other. But, in how they react to each other & that the family & friend business is still retained. Sometimes a good day is only good because of the conversation between & among family or friends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At the risk of contradicting myself on the realism issue, can we discuss the prop used for Nicole's test results?

First, I don't know of any medical system who wouldn't want to bill for another visit in order to review the results.  There's not a test that I've taken in the past decade that didn't require a meaningless follow-up appointment to tell me that my cholesterol is high, and I need to eat fewer eggs.

Second, maybe they'd print out the result rather than emailing them.  But, I don't think they'd be in an envelope like that. 

Third, due to a number of variables, must results don't include a specific narrative, so Sloan would have to know a lot about DNA in order to deduce that EJ was not a match. 

Although, this is the same hospital that Marlena showed Kayla her co-worker Nurse Whitley's psychiatric case notes without consent.  I'm certain there's more people here who've had amniocentesis than a double wedding, so feel free to respond if you are a content expert.

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was laughing that the specialist Dr told EJ that she didn't need to be there because the results were self explanatory.  He wasn't the father.  She was just going to let EJ read that by himself lol?  There were clear variances I am sure she was aware of but wouldn't follow up at all?  That's actually how the show explained it.  So silly...

I am not sure what Marlena was thinking.  I thought maybe it was because Kayla had already reviewed her patient files when Marlena was suspended for her MarDevil actions, but that didn't seem to be the case or at least Kayla didn't acknowledge it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm hoping that it doesn't happen. If the show keeps putting out good performance and story it will be hard to shut it out. Daphnee, Trisha, Ambyr and Colby are earning nominations without question.
    • Speaking of correcting dates, since you mentioned it above, why don't you go back to your Saturday post and edit it and replace your wording of "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-2-83"  with "DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-1-83" and add a note that the video has the wrong date of 11/2/83 on it, and that the video is actually 11/1/83. 
    • If the show ever chooses to show any flashbacks of major Ted scenes, the Ted/Eva, Ted/Kat, and Ted/Nicole scenes would need to be re-filmed with nuTed. Since there have been hardly any Ted/Martin scenes with the CurrentTed, they have avoided the difficulty of doing recreated flashbacks with nuTed for scenes with Martin.  The only one would be Martin punching Ted after the anniversary reveal (unless there's something in the next few episodes). I agree with other posters that the fact that we barely saw CurrentTed and Martin interact, makes it less impactful to viewers to see Martin's outrage at the reveal. 
    • This makes me think of that famous quote from COOL HAND LUKE,  "What we've got here is failure to communicate." I did not bring up "apparently" to try to get across either truth or validity, but doubt. If I had been sure, I would have said something entirely different. But, I'm not trying to argue, I hear you & I will comply. Besides that, I will endeavor to word things differently. I am never against trying to improve. 
    • That’s been my main issue with his response. It didn’t feel that earned by what came before. Definitely needed to see more of the Richardsons as a full family unit prior to all of this.
    • Bingo! I thought the exact same thing. Martin's anger feels so out of place, because we've hardly seen him interact with his parents. Vernon and him have more of a father/son relationship and we've seen their dynamic more fully play out. While obviously Ted and Marton are father and son, it felt a bit empty because we haven't really seen them bond or truly connect in any scenes.
    • Leslie inferred over 20 years ago, so Eva and Kat are over 20 at least 
    • As it happens, 40 years ago this week, ABC and CBS revealed their 1985-86 fall schedules. NBC revealed theirs the week before. ABC's would end up changing. The original plan for Tuesdays was to have Diff'rent Strokes lead the night, with He's the Mayor at 8:30, followed by Who's the Boss at 9, Growing Pains at 9:30, and Moonlighting at 10. There was some surprise over MacGruder & Loud not getting renewed, but it was considered part of Aaron Spelling's declining influence at the network. Yes, Dynasty was still a hit (for a while longer), but Aaron's shows steadily took up less and less of the schedule. Fall 1984: Seven hours, five of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, Glitter, Matt Houston, T.J. Hooker, The Love Boat, Finder of Lost Loves; MacGruder & Loud aired at midseason, by which time Glitter was gone.). Fall 1985: Five hours, two of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Hollywood Beat, The Love Boat). Fall 1986: Three-and-a-half hours, a half-hour of which was new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Life With Lucy). Fall 1987: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and Hotel; HeartBeat premiered at midseason). Fall-winter 1988: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and HeartBeat). This led to Variety's infamous shady headline in spring 1989: "Aaron's Dynasty Over"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy