Jump to content

Y&R: Peter Bergman and Susan Walters on The Talk (spoilerish)


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Peter Bergman and Susan Walters give scoop about Jack, Diane, and Kyle,
on The Talk, Monday April 18.
The youtube has the full interview.
The tweet has part of the interview
 

Please register in order to view this content

 

The youtube has the full interview.
The tweet has part of the interview

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Susan says she remembered Diane as being sassy and not evil.

She received an email from the show listing all of Diane's bad deeds.  She was surprised to read them all.  She says Diane wants to redeem herself.

Susan says that Diane has made horrible mistakes, and feels horrible about them, and is truly trying to make amends.
Susan adds (quote) "But I don't think that means that she's had a personality swap with anybody totally nice."

Susan says she wants to make Diane sassy again.

Peter says he was off the show for a few weeks recovering from eye surgery, when the show contacted him to tell him that Diane was coming back.  He was thrilled.  He seems excited about the Kyle story and is glad to work with Mealor again.

Peter hints that Jack and Kyle will disagree about Diane.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

oh, I agree. I think it would be a lot more interesting if Kyle is a complete mama's boy and basically kicks Jack to the curb, but IDK what is up with Y&R writers but it seems like large swathes of the male cast hate their mothers or at least have a sort of weird adversarial or non-relationship with them if any at all. It's really weird. 

i just KNOW they're gonna retread the same SL they did when Jack's mom came back. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think they had any idea who he was this time last year. I think they were keeping their options very open. Same with totally dropping the Trina romance that was spoiled for him in the mags once FV clearly took a shine to him. Frank's priorities are bright and blazing in one color. I do think Gio and Emma seem to have worked out given that she is very dry and sarcastic and he is like a hot golden retriever, but I'd still play the field or explore quads with both with very different people - Emma with a scheming young man (of color), Gio with possibly Trina or someone else, or even a boy. Then maybe put them back together, who knows. But of course none that will happen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He definitely got lost in the shuffle last year. First, they were implying that he was Drew’s son, then he was nothing more than just Violet’s bff

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then they changed him to being Dante and Brook Lynn’s son, which was clunky at first but I’m enjoying the storyline now. 
    • GM is adorable, charming and fun onscreen despite months of nothing to do until recently, and has a bodacious bod. I'm not cosigning the show or this story - I haven't watched a full episode in over a month - but I think we're all taking the small victories in 2025 at this point. I'm open to testing this theory!
    • I think Jason might've posted some numbers for the syndication a while ago and the numbers for Falcon Crest was horrible. Like 1.5 rating or something, which was terrible.    ETA: it was actually Paul Raven:   New to syndication 60 min Fall Guy 67 markets 3.1/8 Falcon Crest 110 markets 1.1/5 To get into the top 40, you needed a 4.6/9 rating for reference - and Falcon Crest managed to get into a lot of markets to begin with. In the fall of 1985 Dynasty, Dallas and Knots were syndicated (show / rating / share / coverage % / markets): Dallas 3.4 10 51.7 92 Dynasty 3.4 10 48.7 47  Knots Landing 3.3 10 12.5 20  So, Knots as an example trippled Falcon Crest's rating with 20 markets - I'm sure those were major ones but it just goes to show you how much Falcon Crest bombed in syndication. 
    • It's not bad but the stories move too slow. It's the same problem when Dan O'Connor was CO-HW with Van Etten, they have a million stories and they all drag on endlessly with no resolution. I'd argue the majority of the stories airing now are good but you get sick of waiting months for something to happen.
    • Thanks. I must have missed that period entirely for Lifetime. 
    • Thanks. I know Marland did that type of thing sometimes but it's less likely with these characters. I don't even remember Alex ever mentioning him.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy