Jump to content

Fear has made daytime stale


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

I think those expectations unfortunately are too high for Daytime during the time period in question. You barely get that even with more niched and focused primetime shows, let alone ensemble series. I feel like you can count on one hand how many shows like that existed as major television productions/series. Most of them only on premium cable networks (Queer As Folk, The L Word, Looking, Glee and maybe Grey's Anatomy if you squint) and it's 2020. Usually in a primetime series you are lucky to get one gay character, with one love interest and then the series runs it into the ground. 

 

I feel like a big reason the writers don't bring on many gay characters is they feel it limits storylines. I think that's why Pratt made Reese bi-sexual, so he could create a love square between Reese, Zach, Kendell and if he could have re-written Bianca's status as a lesbian he would have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I feel like streaming has done a lot of good here to carry the flag of the above shows and push things forward, with series like Sense8, High Fidelity (with Zoe Kravitz as a sexually fluid lead), Special, Dear White People, Transparent, Orange is the New Black, and dozens of series that most of us may not know but are waiting for discovery. The ability to narrowcast programming, without pressure to please a broadcast-size audience, has been sooo beneficial. Network TV isn’t even close to doing a good enough job, primetime or daytime. (The CW had been making some strides in recent years.) Cable at least has dramas like Pose, but they could be doing more, beyond the Ryan Murphy stuff and Killing Eve, etc.

 

I’m curious about the sexually fluid idea for soaps. It would definitely open up the number of available partners a character could have (the advice to be “not too specific,” so that any character could be anyone’s brother or sister or lover).
 

But a lot of us mention that the secret between Kyle and Theo on Y&R should have been that they were lovers, instead of the banal stupidity about drugs and girls that it ultimately became. Would the blue hairs in the audience have accepted Kyle with Summer and Lola with the knowledge that he banged/got banged by a dude? No. 1, the writers don’t have the luxury of setting that story up properly (patience just isn’t a thing that soaps value these days), and No. 2, they’ve struggled so hard for years to find a youngish male lead who clicked with the audience, which Michael Mealor has done, and they don’t want to “taint” him with risky storytelling. Especially when they felt they ticked that box with Mariah, which they’ll pat themselves on the back for but won’t really invest in. (I know they also did it with Adam, but his sex with Rafe was a homophobic attempt to show how much of a sociopath he was, which only made his “rescue” by Sharon’s love more appealing.) I think soaps feel much more comfortable creating fluid female characters, and we have all of two of them on daytime (Kristina on GH and Mariah).

 

Soaps have always also done LGBT stories with characters under 40. The few major exceptions have been psychos (Nora’s serial killer husband on OLTL and the dude Lucinda was dating who was creeping on Luke on ATWT). I sort of get it, because they’re using LGBT stories to pull in younger viewers, but it feels like a missed opportunity. There’s so much richness in the lives of older characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me the issue with the Reese/Zach/Bianca, etc. storyline wasn't that Reese was bisexual or had chemistry with Zach; it was that Bianca and their much-hyped relationship, brought on with great fanfare, was just a vehicle for delivering Tamara Braun and pairing her with Thorsten Kaye. (I think Braun was sold a bill of goods as well; she was committed to the romance with Bianca.)

 

On another show, with better writers, the bisexual angles with Reese, Bianca and Zach could have played well and been edgy but smart, complicated but daring, but they needed to put the time into committing to Bianca, who was the money with the audience, and Bianca and Reece together, and they didn't. They prioritized Zach and the hot new hire who'd they sold on the back of Bianca's immense popularity. Supposedly Eden may have left over a plan for Bianca to sleep with Ryan out of revenge, or something - I would've watched that! Though it seems nonsensical, at least it would be soapy and complicated. But Pratt's stated goal was to cement Reese as a bisexual vixen on canvas aimed primarily towards the men of his choice, not to present a major lesbian couple which did have star power or play a tangled, edgy bisexual triangle. The latter would've worked for me.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would have been interesting to see how Bianca Montgomery and Luke Snyder aged had their respective shows continued on, with those characters remaining on the canvas. AMC, I think, would be better the bet bc they were so comfortable with Bianca's sexuality partly because of how - and idk if this is the word - mainstream she was. She was everything any other younger female from Pine Valley, Pennsylvania, could have been, it's just that she pursued relationships with women. She grew up to become a typical Pine Valley mom, and I think that at some point, they would have paired her with a long-term love interest, and with time, they easily could have become daytime's first/only lesbian tentpole couple. Had the show continued and continued, it wouldn't have been outside the realm of possibility to have the big Christmas celebration at their house, and Bianca would be reading the AMC poem (which she already did for the 35th anni.).

 

The only daily soap that I know of that did a older gay characters/couple was Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman near the end of its first set of 130 episodes. The storyline centered on Mary's new neighbors Ed and Howard, who were awkwardly pretending to be brothers while living together until it was revealed they were actually a couple conflicted on whether or not to just come out openly and get married (which is what Ed, the older one, wanted - Howard was like 5-10 years younger and was less confident). Their story was all too short, and I wished they would have kept them on as part of the show's stable of characters, but still, they did a decent job at a time when Y&R and DAYS both backed down from their planned stories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Luke and Bianca both had one thing that other needed to be fully realized soap characters. 

 

The biggest problem with Bianca was having a meaningful love interest. She had more or less great writing, great development and the commitment of her show but her writing was never focused on her romances. The show did everything in it's power to keep Bianca single. Frankie, Lena, Maggie, Zoey, Reese, Marissa one after another they just gave her pointless love interests that went nowhere. Marissa was probably the closest that came to a long-term love interest that was stable. They had children together and wanted to have a family together but they ended up killing her off. They loved Bianca as a character but hated her love life. 

 

Luke had love interests, and actually had two popular ships but the show was not interested in good story-telling for him and as time went on, they cared less and less about him as a character. So you end up with two solid couples more or less with Luke and Noah and Luke and Reid, but with piss poor story-telling, low investment and back-burner status. 

 

 

Edited by Skin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Luke and Will had the same problem. They were stuck in boring pairings.The money couples were Will and Paul and Luke and Reid and in both cases the fans got shafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Members

Only having four soaps has made daytime stale. The same small pool of actors that seem to move back and forth between the four shows. A few years ago, an ABC executive said the soap opera genre is dead and that there will never be another new soap. It's been about 20 years since the last new one. They went from twelve shows to four. They used to replace the ones they cancelled with new ones. That changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy