Jump to content

Soap Tropes: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly...


Recommended Posts

  • Members

The Good: The bitch goddess (Lisa, Rachel, Erica, Jill, Brooke); Social climbing; Character development; Engaging opening title sequences

 

The Bad: All of the black people/minorities are related; Super-couples; Endless stunts; Repetitive dialogue 

 

The Ugly: Raping the heroine; Rehabilitating the rapist; The illiterate person of color learns to read and improves his/her life (huge sigh); A woman on cough medicine/slightly out of it mistakenly sleeps with her husband's brother and bears his (the brother's) child; Forcing a newcomer down the audience's throat; The only people of color are cops, thugs, gangsters, accountants, or under-fives...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Good: benevolent grandmas who are accepting of almost anything/anyone
Bad: people with no business experience whatsoever successfully maneuvering the corporate world
Ugly: original premises shapeshifting and transforming and regenerating into all kinds of crazy nonsense to attract "younger audiences"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's funny, I remember in the late 90s and early 2000s almost every complaint about daytime was their desperate attempts to cater to a younger audience by getting rid of vets and bringing on a bunch of hair models and having everyone half-naked. But now it seems like everyone is old and telling the same stories for 20 years. Instead of trying to attract new viewers they're desperately trying to hold onto the few they have and by doing that the same characters are making the exact same bad decisions they were making 10, 15, 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good: Older Matriarch/Patriarch of a town, who all people come to for advice/everyone gathering at the core families home for holidays/poor girl/guy from the wrong side of the tracks social climbing/exasperated mother/older female dealing with the town vixen/said vixen actually has a heart of gold

 

Bad: Triangles where two women fight over a man, one is always "bad"/Woman turns psycho to give supercouple more story/small midwest town has international airport and "yachts"/several international businesses/young people are instantly heads of corporations/there is so middle management in a coroporation just v.p.s/no writer does research on how publicly held companies work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was just thinking the other day how much I miss seeing "have-nots" on soaps, grasping at every opportunity to obtain a better life for themselves and/or their loved ones.  Nowadays, it seems like every character has a private jet that's always at their disposal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I miss that, too. Recently, I was rewatching GL from 1996 and there was still such a great class structure between the wealthy Spauldings, the upper-middle Lewises, and the lower class Reardons at Company. You would never find an Alan Spaulding dining at Company or going to Buzz's lil restaurant unless it was to torture Buzz or Reva. 

 

Eventually, all the soap characters on every show became part of a general class, where a young girl knocked up by a gay guy can be running DiMera Enterprises and whatnot... 

 

 

To add to "The Bad": I was going to either revive an old thread or start a new one... but some things nitpicky that make a big difference is the lack of detail or effort to the every day simple stuff. It's so annoying when someone at Crimson Lights or Brady Pub orders a coffee and then proceeds to hold onto an EMPTY cup! We can see an inch down into the cup and there's nothing in there. They set it down on a table and we hear the hollow sound when it's set on the table. 

 

It's just as realistic as a women waking up in full makeup and perfectly coiffed hair. 

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The good: Strong matriarchs and/or patriarchs, family gatherings and holiday traditions, divas and vixens, tent pole characters. 
 

The bad: Constant endless triangles, rush to get married amongst teens and early 20-something’s in this century, pushing each pet couple as a super couple, and not using history.

 

The ugly: near incest with relationships. People falling for step-siblings and/or adopted family members is really quite the stretch but three members of the same family shouldn’t be in a triangle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The good: History, family scenes and strong actresses.

 

The bad: Writers pushing longterm characters under the bus for theeir new pet/creation.

 

The Ugly: The handling of rape and sexual assault and the inevitable "redemption" of the rapist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy