Jump to content

DAYS: Jack Spoiler


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No problem. He got new eyes from Zach, had his surgery and is now back in action in some aspects but his impotence has not been cured yet. So we are seeing him a lot more. I think he was on at least 3 days this last week, and Lexxie is on more too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, when you have a HW who either does not or cannot write for him, I don't know if that can happen. JER just seems like he can't stand MA, and that's a shame. I wonder if he ever saw how dark Jack was when he first came on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least Matt gets paid the same no matter how much he works (contract)

Really though, it's to the point where I just don't care anymore. J&J have been wasted so bad, I wish they had never come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS ruined Jack and I amazed any Jack & Jenn fans would want them to get back together. (And I am one of the former Jack & Jenn fans). Frankie & Jenn are a much better couple, Frankie is a much better man than Jack. Billy Warlock and Melissa Reeves's chemisty is not forced, it's actually as good as Matt Ashford's and Missy's (maybe even better!). Jack is a total son of a !@#$%^&*] for the way he has done Jennifer, Abby and Jack Jr. by faking his death. DAYS should kill this guy off once and for all and let the fine actor Matt Ashford move to a show that would welcome him. I'd like to see him back on GH as Tom Hardy, Audrey needs her son back and that could give her some much needed airtime. Also Tom might be a good love interest for Carly or Emily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't know about 2, but if Jack comes back having pretended to be dead for the past few months that would be kind of it, wouldn't it, in terms of rooting value? I guess it's his thing to run off and leave Jen and Abby, but there's a limit, imho. 'Course, that's only if he returns and was faking death. We could also get amnesiac Jack, or, y'know, no Jack.

I can almost understand why they don't want to use him. They're damned if they don't have him on-screen, they're damned with almost anything they have him do. I'd give up, too. 'Cause I'm lazy that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack's rootability has RARELY ever been in the writing. Ashford alone provided it back in the 80's and it was he and the fan reaction he got who made the writers eventually redeem him. No one can escape their demons forever, though. And so Jack kept running again and again and again. He's his won worst enemy -- always has been, always will be. Jack the honest family man is a bull [!@#$%^&*] role that Higley put him in. Even in 2001 - 2002 was he more like the real Jack, and again Ashford sold it, no matter how ridiculous. He'll never feel worthy of Jennifer and he'll always yearn to protect her -- and never does it in the right ways. That's just who he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You go Keith, because that's exactly what Jack is. Although he never really paid for raping Kayla, he is punishing himself for it by constantly feeling unworthy of his family and he screws them and himself over. Jack was never meant to be a total good guy. He needs that edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are so right Keith it is in character which is why I didn't mind this story but I am afraid I am no longer a J&J fan. Frankie and Jen just catch my attention and there is just something about them. I love Matt though so I don't care what happens either way but Days is stuck in a bad position. No matter who is writing Jack is hard to write for because he is a very unique, multi-layered character and every writer has had different versions of him. The Jack of the early 90's was great but then Matt came back in 2001 and he was more humorus and the demons were gone. He had gotten way to buffonish. JER has brought some of that back with his feeling unworthy of Jen and his need to protect her even if it hurts her but I still think JER has trouble with him. I honestly don't think he hates Jack-its just difficult to write him. I know others don't see it that way but I am having trouble with him too in my blog and just seeing how different wirters have treated Matt's Jack tells me its difficult. No matter what story Days gives J&J their fans are never happy. I know because I used to feel the same way but I no longer have the energy and Franifer has me going now. I totally understand because J&J fans have been burned so many times but if you think about it J&J have never been together (meaning happy, married ,etc) for a long period like the other couples and that is why many other Days fans have trouble getting into them. Days should take some blame but alot of fans tear Days apart when J&J get a story and then when they are happy they tear them apart again because they have nothing to do. This argument effects other couples too. Happiness always leads to back burner and everyone knows that so its a tough balance and its even tougher for Days with J&J given how the fans and characters have been treated. Its a very delicate and difficult situation and I totally sympathize with both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:rolleyes:

the last time Jack and Jennifer were in a good story was during 2002-2003 B&C era.their "stories" or lack off ever since Dena and then JERk were terrible,starting with that horrid talk show and to Jack being dead twice a year.while Matt and Missy did an amazing job on this last death story,it doesnt change the fact the story was crap imo.

now they are back to a triangle that ENDED 16 YEARS AGO.Jack has been dead since Dec,it's been 4 months and NOTHING happens.how dare we not being happy with the amazing story we are getting from Jer? :rolleyes:

Missy and Billy have no chemistry and as a couple they are boring and dont have what it takes to become a supercouple like Jack and Jennifer are.

as for Jack- corday said at the end we will love Jack even more,but the truth is they are/were trying to ruin Jack's character to make people Jennifer and frankie fans. but I really dont care,since it's not like Jack is the only character JERk ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Most Hardcore J/J fans of the 80's/early 90's hated ALL of these while they were happening:

- Anything with Valley

- Anything with Jack #3

- Ashford's return and him being a deadbeat dad

- Colin Murder Storyline

- The District Attorney storyline

- Jack Being Gay

- Brandon

- Death

- Frankie

J&J fans, for the most part, are always !@#$%^&*]ing no matter what the story. It's never good enough as the 80's stories/early 90's stories were. While it's going on, J/J fans hate it, and then a few years later, they use it to say that JER not writing as much for them is as bad as stories they hated. Amazing.

Personally, I am sick of fanbases and wish they'd just watch the show and take what they can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/shortland-street-fears-speculation-grows-about-shows-future-amid-industry-struggles/T2GECWXTI5AD3AMEV46YYYUE6E/ Still a big cloud over whether the show will get another year.
    • I had hoped they'd pair her with Michael Knight. They had a nice chemistry and he's been one of the better random castings on GH. When it comes to Gio, I found the scenes with Dante to be overdone. It's obvious they're trying to set up conflict for the reveal but I don't think that was needed. It actually made me less excited for the reveal and killed any interest I had in Dante and Gio forming a bond.
    • He also lost the woman he was going to marry, under very sudden circumstances. They are probably surprised Rena has wanted to stay. I think Lois works OK in her current capacity, if they allowed her to have more of a point of view, a bit more life of her own, and not just the reason for Gio's paternity being hidden. The character always felt very thin to me and on paper this dynamic with Tracy, Brook Lyn, Gio, visits from Gloria could be better for her than how overly centered she was on the canvas the first time around. But as of now she could be better used.  Somehow the show that was revived due to supercouples seems completely alien to romance. The older cast has this hardest but even with tiers who are younger or middle-aged, they've really dragged their feet about Liz and Lucky, they have contorted themselves in trying to figure out how to pair a man with Joss, Kai and Trina barely get focus...and others I struggle to remember. They also blew up Sasha/Cody so now I guess we're meant to be waiting to see if she finds true love with Jason? The show is so hesitant and when you are this hesitant it means you are incapable of writing romance.
    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, early 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy