Jump to content

GH: February 2015 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 964
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's lame and bogus. How can you mean to write something and have it come out different? Was there not a proofreader? How about all the assistant writers who read it and have to write dialogue for it? Julian said this more than once also. This is just RC not being able to explain a crucial part of the mystery and it sort of cheapens and ruins the whole thing. Imagine if Agatha Christie wrote a murder and then last chapter explained it and said "the information on page 164 is erroneous. It was meant to say....."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is what happens when you have no real story arc. This plot has changed many times. I'm just waiting for the explanation as to why Helz needed Luke to dig up his 20 year old corpse lookalike. That will be a beauty. Nothing has made sense and neither will that. Fluke fighting with the corpse for 4 months fits how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

moRon has seen the error of his ways after it was asked of him to find common ground with his audience, especially when they are right. Last week, someone pointed out this Fluke nonsense has been going on too long. Ron replied that the person is not familiar with a 6 mos story arc. It was pointed out that the "story" has gone on a year, especially when HIS character says so. Makes no sense to argue with a viewer who thinks a story has gone on too long especially when your character contradicts your Twitter explanation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

He had to admit it because as Mulder would say, "The truth is out there".  It is just such a dumb lie.  It is like me saying right now that two sentences ago I meant to say Scully not Mulder and not only that but the other people paid to read the script didn't notice it also.   Even if he is telling the truth (which I doubt he is) all that means is he has no business being paid as a professional writer.   He predicated the entire mystery of "who is Luke?" around Julian affirming again and again he met this guy at a place years ago, it was the central story of the entire year.   It is a little late for

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't Tony also say in an interview, possibly with Logan before his medical leave, that he knew who Fluke was and established why the guy would do this and it all made sense? This is a rewrite unless another stupid twist is coming.

Don't these people know the rabid fans are pretty much all they have left, and we are literally looking for these clues like panning for gold in a toilet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • March 27, 2025 - GH Sherilyn Wolter (Celia Quartermaine) visited Emma Samms (Holly Sutton Scorpio).  They are friends in real life.    
    • Poor Philip. I appreciate how seriously his and Xander’s scenes were taken though. It felt like real drama and not like a big joke. You could actually feel Xander’s pain and anger. It adds another dynamic to the Kiriakis family storylines and I’m looking forward to the effects that this is going to have across the canvas. I can see them weaving Kate and Roman into this storyline as well. And it would be really nice if this somehow helped cause conflict for Stephanie/Alex too, especially because of what Alex did today. With any luck, Stephanie will be furious about it.  And I’m glad that Sarah has Maggie to confide in about her secret. I also liked seeing Steve and Shawn (and their matching jackets

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) continue to be on the case. Kevin, revealing everything to them is another interesting turn in this storyline. Plus, it seems the writing has improved for Shawn as well. 
    • TBF, I don't think we've seen her interact enough with the "have-nots" to know if she is or isn't. It's possible, but I don't think you can say that from her interactions with Eva and Silkpress.
    • You're right - though I did confuse his name with an actual actor who was on Dynasty.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • "Might" is not "is". And I was talking about the specific case about her attitude to Eva. 
    • But she can still be a priveliged elitist. She might have the same attitude to anyone from 'the wrong side of the tracks' whether they had an agenda or not. Nicole seems to be an outlier in her family.Her parents, kids and sister seem to think themselves above reproach.
    • Damian's clothes have definitely been a specific look -kinda reads 70's pimp to me . I guess it's a trend?? but it seems more suited to Holden. JR is 51  and I guess Damian is supposed to be a little younger but it looks a little odd on him in my book. But at least they're trying. The men's clothing has been bland/generic for years-either suits or basic casual stuff interchangeable  b/w them.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy