Jump to content

Nielsen Has Been Getting TV Ratings Wrong for Months


DramatistDreamer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This is from Deadline with more information what happened with ABC. http://deadline.com/2014/10/abc-ratings-premiere-week-nielsen-glitch-primetime-gma-world-news-kimmel-849788/

This is the prime time info- the article also goes into detail about late night, the nightly news and late night talk. "In the revised ratings, only 5 ABC series received upward adjustments — .1 for all — the usual suspects Modern Family (3.8),Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (2.0), Once Upon a Time (3.5), Grey’s Anatomy (3.1) and The Goldbergs (2.4). What’s more, two series, Nashville (1.4) and Revenge(1.3), were adjusted down a tenth, the first time an ABC series has received a downward adjustment this fall."

So yes HTGAWM didn't have as high as a rating as original thought for Live Plus Same Day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've always wondered over the years just how many people Neilsen counts. I have never been, nor have I ever known anyone who was, a participant in their system. To me, it's like when the newspapers or tv news take polls of 1,000 people and proclaim "the majority of Americans" think this or that.

Seriously, with today's technology and big brother monitoring, there has to be a more accurate measurement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, I do know someone who is a Nielsen "family" and I've seen the box as well. One of the reasons, no one really knows is that each individual or groups are asked not to tell anyone that they do the Nielsen's.

I do agree though, it seems strange that such a relatively small community has such outsize influence on ratings and ad dollars.

Ironically, I was approached to be a digital Nielsen (online) participant but I declined because it sort of freaked me out to have to install software onto my computer that someone could tabulate (and possibly monitor) page clicks. I know that with the TV top box, you need to turn it on but there is this paranoia I have that once installed inside my computer, I could actually have been handing control over to someone or something operating from remote. Also, they weren't offering nearly enough compensation to make it even worth my while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like Hulu/Netflix hits are more reliable than Nielsen's system, to be honest. We were a Nielsen family twice when I was a kid, and both times, I was literally the ONLY person in my family of 4 who actually wrote down everything I watched. My parents and older brother literally did not care at all, but they're all avid TV junkies like myself, so...yeah. I still think about those lost Nielsen points for Lifetime's Any Day Now and that local New Orleans rap news show Phat Phat 'n All That.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree but isn't it ironic that neither publicly releases their ratings numbers? Wall street seems to get really pissed about this (lol). Netflix is subscriber based, so if the subscribers and the producers of the shows don't care, why the hell should anyone else?

Hulu, the free version does rely on Ads but I'm thinking that everyone knows they do healthy numbers anyway and the ads keep rolling in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, it appears that at least one ABC show's ratings was noticeably affected by the Nielsen's glitch. Are there others?

http://www.aol.com/article/2014/10/14/nielsen-strips-abcs-world-news-tonight-of-primetime-crown-after-ratings-error/20978142/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl15|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D545699

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • For those who care (like @DRW50) and want to be spoiled:

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess I have to reluctantly rewatch
    • That works for me. And/or Dani could be in with a fast crowd and got involved with something shady and Bill came to the rescue.
    • I think judging from synoses of other shows, that the summaries are roughly in the order they played throughout the year. So Kubeck returned to a more crime theme. Maybe now that EON was competition they wanted that audience? Re Jameson Parker, the story goes that he was not pleased that TPTB wanted to tread lightly with the Dale/Ellen romance and he was taken to task over some improvs he added re touching Ellen in ways considered too 'racey'.So when his contract was up he quickly moved to OLTL as Brad.
    • I don’t think it was intentional. Because if it was, I imagine it would’ve been mentioned in one of those ‘Welcome to the Neighborhood’ specials that aired. 
    • I mean, soaps are a world were 5'2" Eva Longoria can be a runway model...
    • I wonder if Michelle Val Jean even considered this. It seems so obvious to many of us.  If they want the Dupree name to continue, Anita and Vernon need at least one male heir.  Two would be even better.  Do you think Val Jean may have written it this way intentionally for some reason?  
    • Agreed Anita and Vernon definitely needed a son or two.  The Duprees are the core family, yet the name practically doesn’t even exist anymore.  Some slot machines would be nice

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I would have it come out that Dani was pregnant with Naomi while her career was still on the rise, and the idea of a Dupree having a baby out of wedlock would be scandalous, and Bill, who was starting out in his career, received pressure from Vernon/Anita to do the "honorable thing" and marry her and in exchange Vernon promised to help his new son-in-law out with his legal career. 
    • Dani,

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Dani as a model never sat right with me, especially when some of the cringe dialogue was saying she was a rival to Naomi Campbell. Not trying to be mean or disparaging against her, but in no world would Dani/Karla Mosley's looks have ever have been accepted in the real world and ultra competitive high fashion modeling industry - certainly not 15-20 years ago. I get this is fiction, but come on...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy