Jump to content

Ebola outbreak


alphanguy74

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I read that Dallas Presbyterian initially sent him home, citing that he had nothing more serious than a low grade fever, even though he told them he'd just come from Liberia. Only days later when he was much sicker and had to be brought by ambulance did the hospital check for Ebola.

Very scary that a large hospital, the first line of defense for any outbreak, apparently does not bother to keep themselves informed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In Frankfurt, Germany, a doctor from Uganda is currently being treated. He was part of an Italian aid organization in West Africa.

There's also another patient in an hospital in Hamburg who is reportedly "almost cured" from the disease. This man is also from West Africa.

I'm not scared easily, but I'm a little paranoid when it comes to diseases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to say that as awful as all this is, it's shining a light on how that are just some things America's free market/private businesses can't handle. We see all the ways people put themselves at risk to earn a living and how we take all that for granted. But now we're dealing with something stronger than monetary need. The sad thing is that if this guy had flown someplace with universal health care he probably would've gotten better treatment and fewer people would've been put at risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like to believe we can contain it, even though I can see a few more cases popping up. The man from Liberia originally lied about being around infected people, so I think the sort of fear that stops people from admitting they could have it, might lead to an outbreak here and there in the West. We are damn lucky it can't be transmitted until there are symptoms.

I wonder if the government is giving money and resources to that company that had a cure? We should have been doing that right from jump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right and I hope if it works, we hand it out like candy in Africa. As for the financial aspect of big pharma, I'm always torn on that. I think there is some truth in the idea that these companies aren't going to fund research and development, if it doesn't pay off. Still, we can't let them hold the world hostage when the stakes are so high. There has to be some reasonable and fair compromise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thomas Eric Duncan, a Liberian citizen is in a Dallas, Texas hospital being treated with Ebola. He has already exposed over 100 people. How did he ever get into out country? It's like anything goes now. And is he paying for his care?

This Liberian in a Dallas hospital claims he carried a pregnant woman with the disease in Africa to a hospital which turned her away because it was full. So, he carried her back home where she died. Therefore, knows full well that he was exposed to this deadly disease and could have had the it before he got on a plane and entered our country. It's possible that he came here for the better treatment.

Who is going to pay for all the medical care for the people he exposed the disease to? Who is going to pay for all the security to keep the people home he exposed the disease to?

The guy KNEW he was exposed to ebola, but chose to come here anyway!

Thousands of Americans visit abroad and should be banned from entering our country if they were visiting an area where Ebola is running rampant until there is proof that they don't have the disease. We can't be so overly nice to these possibly-infected people at the same time exposing multiple innocent other people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hopefully this man can recover, I pray that he does. In the event he does recover, I think he should face charges as he lied when asked at the airport whether he had been exposed within the last 21 days. At the time, his temperature was normal, so all they had was his word. In reality, that's all that anyone truly has in these cases.

I know this will not be what many want to hear but in a vast, globally connected country like the U.S. which is connected to other countries, North and South, I honestly don't believe a travel ban would prove effective. There will be ways around it. The U.S. can't even conquer cyber security, so I don't foresee a travel ban providing anything but a pacifier effect.

If the U.S. were an island or a small country, I could see a travel ban working.

As much as people won't like to hear this because it is a complicated, time and labor intensive strategy, the only true answer is to contain Ebola where it lives and breathes...in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.

Nigeria stamped out whatever Ebola outbreak it had so Africa is not incapable of containing the disease, even in a country that has problems with corruption and political strife. Nigeria does have better infrastructure and a better performing economy but at the very least, none of these countries are as big and expansive as Nigeria. The U.S. has stepped up its efforts to help set up infrastructure in Liberia and I've heard that Great Britain and France are performing similar efforts in the other countries. Nigeria, I understand is lending expertise and Ghana has been structuring a Command Center.

The countries with outbreaks which have high poverty rates and lots of political squabbling need to be obliged to improve their efforts or risk an end to financial and logistical support. Delivery of supplies and humanitarian aid have been delayed (with deadly, disastrous consequences), particularly in Sierra Leone because of political infighting. This strikes me has the height of hubris!

I understand the fear but we have to be pragmatic and realistic and not operate based on reactionary impulses. Institute a travel ban in a multicultural, multiethnic, globally connected, large country like the U.S. and watch people find a way around it (by the way, Duncan flew in from Belgium).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is absolutely the answer and the only ethical thing to do imo. We should have thrown the resources of the entire developed world into stopping this disease in it's tracks from the beginning. Then it would have been less likely to be on our doorstep now.

Cost is about the last thing I'm worried about. A disease like this is every bit as dangerous as ISIS. If we have the money to fight them on foreign soil, we've got the money to stop this epidemic in Africa, before it really breaks out in the west. People who are afraid for their lives will lie. I can't really blame the guy for that because I think it's what many people would do in the same situation.

I can however, blame the hospital who sent him home, after he came in presenting symptoms. That was sloppy and we need to do better as a society. Look at how many people in health care have been infected. These people are supposed to be the experts. It makes me think this is going to be harder to control then some media outlets would have us believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He had been in Liberia but he was not from Liberia. The patient was a priest/missionary and Spanish citizen who, after being diagnosed with Ebola was flown back to Spain and subsequently died a few weeks ago.

Authorities and medical researchers are still trying to trace the nurse's movements during and after the priest's care (apparently she went on vacation after he died) but one medical researcher speculated that some breach in care protocol may be the connection to her infection (e.g. cross contamination while removing protective gear which requires assistance and precision and care).

I wonder if people are aware that this latest incarnation of Ebola (which has been around in the public consciousness since the 80s/90s) has been spreading for almost a year now. This didn't just happen in a vacuum or spread like wildfire-- it has been happening FOR MONTHS!

While the U.S. and half the Western world has been handwringing over ISIL/ISIS, as if they will be on all of our doorsteps tomorrow, ebola and the enterovirus has been consistently killing people for quite some time now, with little notice until recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Beth #1 being recast right before she and Eric come face to face was jarring.  We spent the first 50 episodes or so getting to know Beth and see her rapport with her kids, co worker, and even her mother in law. Her Beth seemed content with her kids and job as caterer, but you could tell she also had a faraway look that you just knew meant that she dreamed of what life would have been like had she and Eric gotten together.   Plus, she came across as someone that you could see eventually moving into more wealthy circles based on her demeanor.   Seeing Beth always looking off into space probably helped fuel Brooke's dreams of wealth because she saw how unfulfilled her mother was.  Once Beth was recast starting in episode 52, that whole vibe completely changed and Beth #2 seemed to almost like living the middle class life.. and that her Beth would feel ill at ease around wealth, etc.
    • I agree.  I've always chalked it up to the fact that DALLAS had been a pop culture phenomenon for many years and that viewers, including viewers who'd stop watching years before, were tuning in one last time to say goodbye. Also agree that it was interesting to see KL finish 27th for the week.  Any show doing that well after 12 seasons is a miracle, lol.
    • I don't know anything BTS, but your theory seems reasonable.
    • In comparison to Maurice Johnson, sure, but he's still... stiff AF. "Leaps and bounds" is a strong exaggeration as well. Watching him is like watching paint dry. I'd recast him next, ASAP.
    • Yes! Andre easily could have just been a hunk with no real depth (like Derek) but his character is rounding out very nicely.
    • They're contract; anyone in the opening is a contract player.
    • I was watching an episode last night and noticed that Pictionary is taped in Atlanta. It's just a walk for Chandler to the studios.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • my vote goes to Eden (Belle)! She single handed carried that show on her back !! Best family will probably be The Dingles! I have to say 2024-2025 was a mixed bag on all of them soaps ! But if I had to say which one would be the best I would give it to Emmerdale for Belle/Tom’s storyarc. It went on for too long but at least was written properly compared to others. But I do think Corrie will win best soap for Mason’s storyline  Best storyline… I wish it would be Belle and tom but the abuse story from Hollyoaks will take that 100%
    • I have to push back on this. I just don't believe it. I don't believe MVJ or anyone at BTG operates that way -- seeing a performance in reveal scenes and saying "That actor has to go." If that's the case, why aren't they doing that with other actors? We all know Maurice Johnson is FAR from the weakest actor on this soap. My feeling is that Keith Robinson became available and that someone from BTG wanted him badly from the beginning. I think this recasting was all about Robinson and not about Johnson at all. Yep, and anyone who can't see that isn't paying attention. Calling Brandon Claybon the worst actor on the show is laughable. Tomas, Ashley, and Derek might be recurring, but they're also key characters, so leaving them out of this actor discussion doesn't work. They get plenty of screen time and are on contract. The only way your narrative works about BC being the worst on the show is to ignore the rest of the cast.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy