Jump to content

AMC: Fear The Walking Dead


YRBB

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

This was a good episode. Tyreese lives in the form of Nick. Madison has almost hit the ground running in terms of knowing what needs to be done. I have mixed feeling about that. She definitely seems pretty heartless at times and it seems a little too soon for that. At the same time it's always refreshing to see a character who isn't harboring delusions that this is just a bad case of the flu. The junkie son (I'll learn names soon) is also smarter than he seems. He's obviously going to get some people killed though. The older Latino guy seems like has definitely been through something similar.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Solid episode.

 

According to some of the backstory in interviews, Madison's husband died when Nick was 13, leaving him something of an arrested adolescent, and she has either addiction or abuse issues in her family past. The Salazars fled the military regime in El Salvador.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if this was originally two episodes in scripting stage. It felt very packed. Not a bad thing of course. 

 

I feel a little sorry for Cliff Curtis, as he will now get the same "what a bleeding heart idiot" hate that Rick Grimes always used to get, but I guess I see the reason they have to have this type of character. At least they have divided the grim reality duties up between Kim Dickens and the older man. I like his wife - it's a shame she will likely die soon.

 

Moments like the power coming on and going off at random times really worked for me, along with the absolutely gorgeous scenes of Cliff and his family seeing the lights go off in one section of town after another.

 

I hope they ease up on the "shocking" moments where someone is grabbed and about to get bitten, because the more it happens the more it starts to seem a little silly and like the walker is doing everything he can to avoid taking an actual bite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think these shows have to have the occasional idealistic person. This show even more than the original. Hell, I'm maybe the only person on this board who liked Tyreese. I don't think it's wrong for some people to have the mindset 'as long as I'm alive I'm going to hold on to my humanity because once it's gone, surviving doesn't matter anyway'. It's easier to justify that thinking on this show because they haven't seen one example after the next of their friends getting killed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Tyreese too. 

 

I don't mind them being idealistic or not wanting to kill those they knew, or those they still see as people. It mostly depends on how it's handled. I thought the scene with Cliff Curtis so adamant about not killing the neighbor, Susan, was a bit redundant as we'd already seen him reluctant to take life 2-3 times in the episode. I thought it just undercut the material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

9/20- episode: 

So I'm been calling Travis, Nick. Oh well.  Speaking of Nick, I have a harder time sympathizing with him than I should. It's not really his fault that he's suffering from addiction during a zombie apocalypse, but I was still rooting for Madison when she started slapping him around. I know she was wrong, but it's TV, so I don't care. Stealing that man's IV was just beyond the pale.

 

Looks like the daughter is a religious nut. Just what you need in an apocalypse a junkie and a religious nut. Was Madison sneaking alcohol in the garage? That would certainly be the icing on the cake, but after what she saw it's hard to blame her.

 

I wonder if it's Tobias trying to contact Madison? He seemed too well developed to just be dropped.

 

At first I thought the army was just taking the weak away and killing them, but if so, why do they need a (fake) nurse? It makes me wonder if they are experimenting on people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Someone at this show really loves glorifying Frank Dillane's body with long, languishing pans, and maybe I should complain about that. But I won't.

 

The episodes get more and more solid. The surreal dread of the fake 'calm' really worked for me, and I love watchng the relationships start to fray and shift. Kim Dickens is showing some Deadwood steel and is really riveting to watch as she changes, which makes me wonder if Madison is the character the showrunners have described as

The scene with her and Nick was awful, but human.

 

I don't think Alicia is a religious nut. The voice-over was her reading Susan's (the Asian woman from last week) suicide letter to her husband, the man who arrived at the very end of the previous episode.

 

I do wonder what happened - did they just seal the city off and then start shooting people? Leave them to die? It's hard to know what exactly happened and how when evidently, the Clarks were living in a lower-middle-class suburb on the edge of the city. But it's also been nine days since Episode 2.

 

Showrunner Dave Erickson on last night's show with EW. Also for THR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am of two minds on this show.  I like the edge the show has where everything seems ominous, but the characters are supremely unlikable almost up and down the line.   Plus, where are the freaking zombies???

  •  The daughter:  Can she die please?   She has been annoying since her first scene and only brings the show down.   Her boyfriend needs to come back and eat her
  • The druggie:   I like him most of everyone on the show
  • The other son:  He seems like he has potential but they don't do much with him
  • The Spanish guy:  He is basically playing a human fortune cookie spouting out words of wisdom with an accent.  Boring
  • The spanish daughter:  I like that she is willing to sleep around to get medicine.    That is good shorthand for "this situation is desperate"
  • The ex-wife:  helpful nurse but unwittingly got them all in trouble.   I think she has potential though
  • The shmuck husband:  Useless, a fool, total FF material up to now
  • His cliche TV wife:  sorry, this is a stock character.   I don't think there is anything new or unique about her than hasn't been on TV before.   These characters get the job done I guess, it is just I could swear this woman ran to seattle to solve cases on The Killing and then ran home to make dinner.   Just nothing new there but the actress is ok.
  • The government as the enemy:   this is old news for TV shows and movies.   Why would the army be killing innocent people except so Ruben Blades can sound wise? 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestly don't know if I like the show.   At times it is very interesting and has tension, but it is loaded with implausible and unlikable characters.  The show has ignored zombies in favor of making the US Government the big bad, and they really haven't given much motive for why the army is now evil except it works as a plot device.   If the end of the world is coming there would be no point in killing everybody and if they don't think it is the end of the world there is now doubly no point in killing able bodied, healthy people.   Who do these male soldiers think will help them repopulate society if they kill every civilian woman on earth?   And there is just no reason for it.   If the US government is pulling out of southern california, there is just no reason to want to imprison every civilian just so you could kill them later.   This all allows Senor All-Wise to draw allegories and comparisons to fascists regimes and corrupt commandantes, but as yet they haven't explained anything.  

I guess that is the bigger problem:  the show about the fall of Los Angeles is filmed in some parking lot behind a studio somewhere.  Don't we want to see the Hollywood sign burn up or the chinese theater overrun with the dead?  For a show supposedly chronicling the fall of mankind all we see is fear and anxiety in the hermetically sealed environment of one family.   The show was more interesting with the riots, and most interesting when the smart kid was foreshadowing how the world would fall.  And then they didn't show it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
    • The casino scenes came out of nowhere in comparison to the rest of the week, but at least there was some movement in the storyline. Joey has really made a fool of Vanessa. Chelsea is really embarrassing herself with this doctor. The desperation is so obvious and she clearly gets that from Dani. Hayley was giving Donna Logan vibes because that is how Donna acted when Eric had a heart attack. Stealing potential evidence is not going to reflect well on Kat and might throw the case against Leslie. Tomas had no business in Eva's hotel room even if he did shut down her advances. But I think they still might end up together at some point because the book that Eva gave him is the same one Kat called basic which seemed like foreshadowing.
    • So Sharon decides not to go to France and stay behind to support Mariah, but now with Phyllis gloating about getting an invite I’m sure she’ll change her mind.    Mariah’s secret is that she screwed that old man? I’m so confused about what’s going on here, and Mariah coming out and telling Tessa that she can’t know her secret is supposed to do what exactly? Is that supposed to put Tessa’s mind at ease? Lol…. I’m getting Cameron Kirsten vibes though. Did he do something to her without her consent and things went too far? These writers really can’t come up with something original if their life depended on it 
    • Eve and Thomas have so much in common--they both like reading (print and audio books) and wow they both like reading *fiction*!  (Also I would never pick up a book called Mercy and Goodness yawn

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy