Members cassadine1991 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Whatever, moving on.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Marco Dane Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Levi is a dirty rat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AdelaideCate007 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 No they're not tearing it down. Yes, they still have the basic original set. They're remodelling and updating it. I agree with whoever said that the show sort of took a turn with Howarth, Alderson, and Easton coming back as the new characters. They were basically forced to bring them back and then Frank and whoever didn't like Ron's original character ideas for them, so we ended up with Silas, Kiki, and Franco. The show has just been kind of off since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cuzIsaySo Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Allegedly. Its obvious like a nose in the middle of the face that hes the culprit but we still dont know for a fact that he blabbed about Nathan to the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 That's an understatement IMO, but I agree. The show completely collapsed for me, in many ways, from then on. It's entertaining in a trashy way but I don't often find it good. How were they forced to bring them back? And who were the original characters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Oh okay, thank you for telling me that, that's all I wanted to know. I was the one who said that the soap was totally different once they dropped everything to keep Alderson, Howarth and Easton, everything they were doing before that was very enjoyable to watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Ignore button is our friend It will be nice to see the Brownstone again, when was the last time we saw it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AdelaideCate007 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Well, I was trying to be polite, but I agree. I usually enjoy a lot of it and find it entertaining but it's never, as you said, good. There are good and sometimes greats moments, but as a whole, it's never really been great overall since before the three of them came back. I don't know all the ins and outs, but ABC higher ups told GH that they had to have them back and find a way to make it work. I think mostly because they didn't want to give in to PP and wanted to stick it to them at the same time. Well, Easton was always going to be a Clay relative. That's part of the reason we had some or that half assed vampire madness happen. Ron thought of Howarth being a Quartermaine relative or Tom Hardy before it was decided he was "too dynamic" for that. Alderson was going to be either Anna Donnelly or Serena Baldwin (which was thisclose to happening) but those both fell apart for some reason. There rumours (which I think are more than likely false) about why she didn't end up as Serena when it almost happened, but I think the real reason is that they wanted to keep her tied to Howarth. Somewhere in the middle of all that, Frank changed his mind about who Sam's father should be and got the "brilliant" idea for it to be Julian and then for them to tie everyone to the Jeromes and here we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 I knew about Frank and Julian. I didn't know ABC wanted them back as much as GH did. "Too dynamic" for anyone but Franco. Wonderful. I always felt Easton should've simply been a Cassadine. I don't know that any role but Brook Lynn could've worked for KA - I wouldn't have bought her as Serena, I know that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Nina is such a fake bitch. She is clearly manipulating the situation. Why is Sam wasting her time on John? He's not worth it. This sh-t has aged her ten years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mr. Vixen Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 The last time I remember was around 2001 when Carly's car went off the cliff and she was presumed dead. I remember Jax coming to see Bobbie there. So they actually mentioned the brownstone and referred to it as being the one Bobbie owned? I'm excited to have it back, even though it'll be kinda said that Bobbie doesn't own it anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Slow your horses. Michael says he's tearing the buildings down and building new high rise apartments in their places. The Brownstone is officially done for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AdelaideCate007 Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Spoiler, but they end up just renovating the brownstone instead of building the apartments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Vee Posted June 18, 2014 Members Share Posted June 18, 2014 Yeah, it was in the spoilers for the month, I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cuzIsaySo Posted June 19, 2014 Members Share Posted June 19, 2014 I didnt like the way Michael just didnt seem. To give a rats ass about the people currently living there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fbb6aa067610794e36433d57928a2f42.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.