Jump to content

HBO's Looking


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I just watched the first 3 episodes back to back. There isn't much going on, it's more like a pastiche of gay characters.

Jonathan Groff's portrayal irks me though (could be the writing though). He is clearly meant to be insecure and type-A, but acting easy going to try compensate for that. Only Groff alternates between the two states rather than display the simultaneous farce. We've all met that person in real life a million times, so shouldn't be too much of a stretch to nail, but Groff fails at it. It's a shame because he did really great work on season 2 of Boss.

I think I like Murray Bartlett's character best. His fag hag is great too.

Russell Tovey is ick (I expect to be pelted with tomatoes for that comment)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Tovey is the guy who had the threesome then yeah he's very sketch to me as well.

I also saw episode 3. I can see why people liked it a lot more but it still seemed to miss that spark of life which makes for compelling TV. I just don't buy the relationships that the show is trying to sell me. Aside from the older guy and the "hag" I just don't feel a real connection between the main three like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I don't get it either. I've watched both Weekend and the small film, Lorimer. I also read the interviews with the three male leads. I did not see how Looking would or could ever be the gay version of Girls or SATC and the modern take on Queer as Folk US.

Neither HBO or any of the folks working on this series (from the producers, writers, directors and actors) promoted this program as any of the other series. It was reporters, commentors, reviewers and bloggers who had to find something to use as a barometer to discuss what they thought Looking was going to be about BEFORE they even saw a clip of any episode. Once they got their screeners and watched them, that's when all of their initial writings on the series couldn't match to what they were viewing.

Why can't Looking just be what it is? A reflection of what these three characters are experiencing in their lives in this fictional world. A world that is "normal, everyday, complicated, sort of boring, with not too many over the top situations".

Edited by difficultdiva
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Last week someone made a snarky comment on my friend's FB page about seeing him on some show, it totally went over my head, but turns out he was the escort on tonight's episode. Small world.

The main character annoys me. His new boss reminds me of Ricky Gervais. And I did NOT realize that was the dude from GL. He looks so much older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If anything I thought the early QAF stories were more ridiculous than some of the later ones (aside from nonsense like Emmett's affair with the football player).

Gale and whoever played Justin started phoning it in long before the last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that is why I like it. It is relateable for the most part, is actually challenging my point of view on some things, and keeping it refreshing.

And the writer in me is seeing it doing what I love to see down...THE SLOW BURN. I think it is setting up a lot of things that will snowball into serious drama. Cuz (just speculating) we totally know that Patrick is probably make some in-roads with the boss and it will get complicated probably in time for the Latino guy to enter the picture again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The slow burn is better than the fast pace, chop chop and exciting things that another person might have chosen to do, if they had created the show.

DRW50 - It was Randy Harrison, who portrayed the Justin Taylor character. I think he's actually a talented actor, but he really couldn't keep his distaste and growing dissatisfaction with what was being written for his character from being seen (and at times read about in the press) from the viewing audience. Especially the ones who became shippers of Brian and Justin. I felt some sort of empathy for him, because he had watched both seasons of the UK original and he assumed (just like I had done), that the tone would be like the one created in Manchester: a world that people could look into and somewhat identify with, regardless of where you come from in life. He also made a point to stress that he was absolutely nothing like the character of Justin, that pissed off a lot of his fanbase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The story that really turned me off I think was mid series (season 3?) where Ted became a sex obsessed meth head. I dunno why, but it just rubbed me the wrong way (sure, it could be argued it's an important story to tell, and one that certainly happens, but it felt particularly nasty to me to show Brian daily do drugs and hook up but make it all work, and then poor unattractive Ted does the same thing and falls into some gay porno Hell with all his friends writing him off.) Brad Fraser, a Canadian gay playwright who I really admire, and have some sort of "facebook" friendship with (Mia Kirshner and Thomas Gibson were in a movie of his most well known play, Love and Human Remains) was one of the main writers for the final seasons of the show, and while his plays are always over the top and sexually graphic I was disappointed that he didn't seem to bring much of what I liked about his work to QAF (I have to be careful what I say on FB about the show, lol.) By the final year it did just sorta putter along -- I still watched every week but only because it was a social thing with some of my friends, I barely was even paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel absolutely the same--the third episode especially. I guess it's really just an issue again of there being so few "gay" shows, so a number of people who probably would never have seen Weekend either, are disappointed that they don't immediately relate with it, or do find it boring (which seems to be the main criticism.) I don't, *shrug* I just hope HBO decides to at least give it a second season.

BTW you mentioned Lorimer the short film that inspired it--I've been trying to track that down. Did you see it online?

I had no idea Randy Harrison was so vocal about his role on QAF in the end, but I can't say I blame him==most of the time I wanted to punch Justin in the mouth. Of course part of the issue was simply that the show had to keep Justin in Brian's orbit, probably partly due to uninspired writing but also due to the fanbase. I remember Davies said one reason he couldn't see QAF going on long was that he just didn't think that the equivalent character, at his age and experience, would stay in the same social world as the others for long (there were plans for a sitcom spin off involving Vince's mother and her group but for whatever reason it never happened, though I believe scripts were written.) Of course that was a problem with the North American QAF in general--they felt like they had to, and were, representating every type of gay and lesbian character, and I think ultimately that meant they didn't do a great job with any of them. Davies got in some flack for not having the lesbian characters very prominent but as he pointed out, that wasn't who he was telling his story about. In that instance I think Looking is similar, and I appreciate that, though I suppose I can appreciate that that means if an audience member doesn't want to spend 30 minutes with those characters than they're not gonna like the show.

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Does anyone have a casting choice in mind for Sharon ? I'd totally love to see Anna Maria Horsford 
    • That’s great news!! Thanks so much!!  
    • It would have been interesting to see Sam Groom back in the role of Russ, when the character returned in 1989 (or even in a later return).  David Bailey was acceptable as Russ, but he didn't have much acting range.  And if Russ and Rachel ever reunited, I don't think Bailey would have been the best choice, because Rachel's husband sort of becomes AW's leading man. I don't think Bailey would have risen to that challenge. But Groom could have done that wonderfully.  I would have also been okay with a complete recast -- hopefully with an actor with a good deal of soap opera experience and someone happy with the role long-term.   And to answer a question: I do not believe Russ's return in 1989 was originally meant to be short-term.  With the reveal that Josie was his daughter, and with Olivia on the canvas, there was lots for Russ to do.  I think Lemay's plan was that Russ return permanently, but Donna Swajeski probably didn't think he was exciting enough and lost interest in Russ.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • However, let me say this and I don't think it applies in the case of MM and BC. Straight actors shouldn't accept a role if they are unwilling to play intimate scenes that are often required in daytime. Imagine a gay actor accepting a straight role and saying they won't do any intimate scenes or have very limited intimacy with an opposite sex co-star. It wouldn't happen though, because the stigma works one way.  I think the limited intimacy has more to do with trepidation of how soap viewers will take it. The average soap viewer is older and more conservative and soaps aren't exactly drawing in younger eyes, so storylines have tended to lean more safe in the 21st Century especially in terms of sex and sexuality with a few exceptions.    On that note, I have finally caught up this week. I am loving the Anita stuff that is brewing and I'm glad TT is finally getting some meaty story to work on and not just be a mouthpiece to move others' stories along or play narrator. NuTed is not sitting well with me. I am having a hard time understanding the casting change, because the new actor isn't exactly hitting it out of the park and he makes the other characters play and feel different with how he plays opposite them. I'm going to give it time, but there was something more endearing about Ted #1  inspite of some of his acting shortcomings.  I am obsessed with Wig. Our girl is really crazy and I'm not sure they're going to be able to keep her on for long without turning her into a caricature or making the show a big joke, but for now mammaaaa (*Eva's voice*) is providing the dramatics.  I've said this before, but I'm super impressed by how far the actress playing Naomi has come. I wonder what she's been doing, because she's gotten so comfortable and the acting has vastly improved.  I have a feeling that Bill is going to say something about Martin being zesty and Chelsea is going to be there to overhear. I thought it was interesting that she didn't feel comfortable telling her father and the convo between Dani and Chels hinted that maybe he might be a little more old school in thinking. 
    • I disagree. I think Jill going off the rails made perfect sense.  It was a multi season process starting in season 8, climaxing at the season 9 cliffhanger, and continuing into season 10.   It was after Jill's story ended was when Knots Landing really went off the rails because it happened just as Abby was leaving the show.. and the Lathams didn't really have anything interesting to follow both of these events.
    • Thank you for that. I came into the show at a confusing time for Cliff because he just floats from one story to the next and his job appears to change. I like him even though I know I probably shouldn't since he's such a creep at times. I might have to go back and watch some of the previous stories because I'm missing some important pieces of Deborah and Geraldine's backstories.    Thank you for the explanation. I'm not sure I have the patience for that so I think I'll give it a miss. I must have bought it with the idea that it was going to cover her time on the soaps. 
    • David Bailey was the only actor that I remember as Russ. I was too young to remember Sam Groom or Robert Hover. When David Bailey returned in 1989, I thought the powers that be should have recast the part. However, I went back to watch some episodes with Bailey. Actually, Bailey was good. The show missed a great opportunity to keep Bailey on longer than six months. Bailey always great chemistry with Vickie Wyndham, Irene Dailey and Connie Ford. And he was good in scenes with Carmen Duncan. Russ could have been involved with Iris again and possibly Rachel with the return of Carl Hutchins. Charles Keating's reappearance in 1989 with Carl being involved with the Red Swan story.  Beverly Penberthy's return in 1989 would have been a treat. Pat could have played the aunt for Josie to lean on, and good romantic pairing later for Spencer Harrison. Even though Paul Stevens had passed away in 1986. I would have brought back the character Brian Bancroft; this time being played by Donald May or John Gabriel. Was the intention for David Bailey to return for only short-term purposes.
    • First up: Finishing up January 1974. Then on to 1973! FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 12/31/73-1/4/74 & 1/7/74-1/11/74:

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy