Jump to content

Is JFP the most Evil woman in daytime?


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Honestly I really think this woman is just pure evil. Poor josh Griffith she stabbed him in the back hard. She will do anything to keep her job. Her argument ratings are up but I can do better. It will be interesting if JFP tries to make y and r more her show. She probably argued her seven years and her years of experience to Steve kent. This woman is evil for many things over years. Firing Ellen Parker on gl, her fights with bev McKinsey causing her to quit. On oltl she fired Laura Koffman at 9 months pregnant, she got robin strasser kicked off abc, she had infamous fight with Sarah brown, the Anna lee stuff, heck she even stabbed Guza in back. Now at y and r who is safe with this complete wench in control. She honestly must be the worst bitch u could ever encounter if u get on this woman's bad side.

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

She is not a bitch. She has a CEO way of operating. We may not like her management style but I tell you this. Everywhere you go, there will be folks who seem to think that they run a show and will try to use their power to get what they want. If I was in charge, I would be putting them in their place left and right as well. If that means firing vets or "stars", so be it. There needs to be clear leadership.

Also this may be coming from the place of my own work environment. Its getting out of hand with a coworker who wants to be the lead and is not...yet, still operates as if they are the manager. Our manager needs to put this person their place, but is too nice to do it. Now the environment is toxic and no one wants to work with the person. After living this, I understand why JFP does what she does. Unpopular but there it is...

  • Members
Posted

PRAISE JESUS!!!!!

I'm curious as to how many managers we have on this board, and can they honestly say they are loved by everyone and all of their decisions make everyone happy? We all know the answer to that!

  • Members
Posted

Correct. We may all want our soaps to be happy behind the scenes but they're a business like everything else. Do I agree with a lot of what JFP has ever done? Hell no ... But she's lasted this long for whatever reason. Not defending her in the slightest but it's not always black and white.

I mean, she DOES have a bit of a similar track record so why anyone is surprised now ... it's truly the near same at every show she's at.

  • Members
Posted

The most evil in all of daytime history? I can't say for sure, but I can say that she is up there based on my history of watching her take a hatchet to great soaps.

That said, despite my not watched Y&R in ages and my glee at Syphillis being thrown out on her ass, I feel for the viewers who are currently suffering under her showkilling M.O. I'd say that it gets better, but I refuse to lie to anyone.

  • Members
Posted

Perhaps, but that falls under a management decision you don't like, which again, was covered. Didn't Hunter Tylo successfully sue Aaron Spelling for that very thing?

  • Members
Posted

Oh so we're going to act like all of JFP's decisions are just management decisions? Honey no. And while yes of course managers have to make tough decision, it's THE WAY she handles the decisions that are gross.

SON:

“It was like the death of Bobbie in my heart and soul, and the death of my livelihood and my work and my ‘GH” family, the fans as well as the people who worked on the set. All of that was all of a sudden gone, like, overnight. One day I was there and then it was like, ‘Merry Christmas, you’re fired,’ and an intern came down and handed me all my stuff.'" - Jackie Zeman

WE LOVE SOAPS:

"I remember one day a scene was written, Kin [shriner] and I were in a scene and it was written we would kiss at the end of the scene. It was a public kiss, we were in a restaurant or somewhere, it wasn’t an in-bed love scene. I remember Jill saying to the director, “Take the camera off them.” She was standing only a few feet away. We asked "why" when it had been written in the script. “Our audience doesn’t want to see old people kissing,” that’s what she said."

We Love Soaps: How did that feel to hear that?

Jackie Zeman: We were in our 40s at the time. That didn’t feel old. It didn’t affect me personally but I felt like, “No you’re wrong, they do.” Just because you turn 40 or 45-years-old doesn’t mean you’re not capable of having a romantic relationship. It doesn’t mean you’re not capable of having loving sexual feelings for another person. I felt it was a mistake. I still do. I believe the audience does want to see that because it’s real.

The funny thing is, JFP had that opinion about 40 year old WOMEN. Apparently it was fine for Geary. She has a history of being both ageist and sexist. I guarantee you if you asked Jill to show some damn proof of her claims, she wouldn't have had any.

  • Members
Posted

Since when are a considerable amount of management decisions not a result of personal feelings? Jill, as well as tons of others, are in a position to put things into place based on how they feel personally (I'm 46, and I'd hate to be told some of the things that JFP have said, but it happens when people are in positions to make decisions). Sometimes we won't agree with those decisions, but they are nonetheless management decisions.

  • Members
Posted

Yes and saying "I don't want any black people working here" would be considered a "management decision" under your rules and yet it wouldn't make it any less disgusting - the same goes for her ageism and sexism. The idea that ageism and sexism is acceptable or a "CEO's way of operating" or just merely "being a manager" is ABSURD.

  • Members
Posted

The amount of bootleg Janet Wood apologists in existence never cease to amaze me - since she's shown her ass many times over by employing sexist, ageist, and racist actions as a means to destroy once-great soaps. She and Cryptkeeper Frons were truly a pair of showkillers who managed to accomplish the destruction in a fraction of the time that it took to build them up to their legendary glory.

I've said it before and I'll say it again - this is precisely why I consider any 'criticism' of any pre-or-post bootleg-Janet-Wood-regime to be baseless.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton practically twirling his moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lol. Right?  I mean the show could have framed the 60th anniversary in a different way, but the narrative was celebrating Tom and the hospital. Also, what a weirdly sexist bunch of posts about women's nail polish.  Like, yes, this is Days problem lol.  Stacy Haiduk isn't a good Kristen because she doesn't wear nail polish?  Are we in the 1950's???
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy