Jump to content

ATWT: Oakdale Confidential


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wow. I'm definitely taping both of the special episodes!

But now the mystery begins. Seven divas on a bus? Who can they be? My guesses...

Lisa (The original diva of Oakdale, besides Aunt Edie)

Lily (The modern diva of Oakdale)

Barbara (the !@#$%^&*]y diva of Oakdale)

Emily (the wacked out diva of Oakdale)

Carly (the violent diva of Oakdale)

And then my mind draws a blank. Hmm...Lisa Brown's attending the 50th anniversary fan luncheon, so maybe she'll do some appearances as Iva? And maybe there are some other guest spots in the works? Rosemary Prinz as Penny? PLEASE!? Or better yet, Patricia Bruder as Ellen. Now THAT would bring back some memories!

I'm thinking that the black-tie thing is not THE anniversary stuff. The March 31 and April 3 stuff will be what we're really waiting for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"It sounds like that's just the book. At least I'm hoping."

I got the impression that the book was just a tie-in account of this on screen murder, not something to the effect of Lorelai's Diary on GL, where the book became the story itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A book about Maddie who has been on the show 6 months? :blink:

This whole anniversary should center on Nancy, Lisa and Bob along with Kim, Susan and a returned John.

The divas had better include Nancy, Kim, Lisa, Susan, Barbara and Lucinda. I would think Lily would be the 7th. No newbies!!!! I don't want to see clips from last week. I want to see classics celebrating the 50 years including the 20 that ATWT was #1 (which was a LONG time ago).

Irreverant episode doesn't sound good to me. ATWT perfected anniversaries with the 30th celebration. That was ATWT at it's finest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I do not like this at all. Granted, I'll probably buy the book to support the show, but I'm definitely not going to read it. I like Maddie, but she's been on the show for less than a year. And I don't consider Katie or Carly to be veterans either, especially since there are characters like Kim, Lisa, Nancy, etc still around! :rolleyes: So what the hell does this book have to do with the 50 Anniversay??

Honestly, I pray to God that ATWT does something a lot better than this on the show for the anniversary; otherwise, I will be extremely disappointed. :rolleyes:

Also, I don't often judge books by their covers, but that one just screams "crappy mystery novel."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't think that the 50th anniversary shows and the book have anything to do with one another. And plus, it's a book. Who friggin' cares?! Just watch the show and reminisce about what a great show ATWT is and what astounding progress it's made over the years, plus a few ups and downs along the way. The book may[/] tie into the show a little bit, but I'm sure they're not gonna make a whole storyline out of it.

They'll probably talk on-air about how some author that grew up in Oakdale and knows all of them has went on to publish many books and has now written one including some Oakdale citizens...or something.

I very highly doubt they totally say "Hey. This is a book. This book is what we're basing our whole 50th anniversary on."

That would be really cool. REALLY cool. Or maybe a totally re-vamped opening.....possibly with faded images of past ATWT stars/characters/storylines/copules/etc. inside the globe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"Also, I don't often judge books by their covers, but that one just screams "crappy mystery novel."

Like COUGH COUGH The Killing Club COUGH COUGH

I really wonder what Julie Poll is doing these days. Perhaps she can update her book for this anniversary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy