Jump to content

Can being a long-time soap actor be a burden?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I've done a lot of theater, and yes it can be very demanding, but like others have said, you're given so much more time to master the character. With soaps, you get that script and you have to know the lines, the emotion, the portrayal, etc. by (in many cases) the next day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't know that either. I didn't really watch Passions but I liked what I've seen of her work on ATWT. She had the right look and charisma, and has aged well, She had a recurring role on Supernatural a few years ago, although she didn't have all that much to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kim is married to Robert J Ulrich, who is a seriously prolific Emmy winning casting director: Glee, CSI, The Mentalist, American Horror Story, Drop Dead Diva etc...

She has indeed aged beautifully, has a very adaptable look and natural charisma. She is an ideal television actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The smart actors who want to work will work, end of story. Look at someone like Debbi Morgan, she has YEARS and YEARS of high profile soap work, but she has maintained an agent (the most important thing next to talent) and she can go from primetime to daytime to film and back again. Since most of these actors don't have agents and don't pursue anything primetime during their time on the soaps, it's harder when the show ends. People like Maurice Benard or Kassie DePaiva think their soaps will last forever, but they won't. This is why the smart actor needs to stay active and auditioning for other things and having an agent to prepare them if they want to continue their acting careers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely. Staying on the circuit is the key and the fact is most soap actors don't stay on the circuit because they become complacent and others likely don't see any point to it since their contracts and/or schedules prevent them from working.

Lauren Koslow is one who goes on auditions even when she knows she can't do the job just to keep her face out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a good interview with Jennifer Bassey about fifteen years ago where she talked about all the efforts she made to differentiate herself in auditions (complete with photos of her wearing wigs and various outfits if she wanted to audition for a cop role or a grandmother role). I don't know if it made a big difference for her or not but it was probably one of the most open I've seen where a soap actor spoke about their primetime efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jennifer Bassey is a hustler, always has been, she never has a problem going back and forth to California if it meant a job. She's an older Kim Johnston Ulrich, blond, charismatic, aged beautifully, confident and capable. It also helped that she was married to the playwright Luther Davis who has since left her a wealthy woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think I may have posted that in an AMC thread a few years back but if I find it again I'll put it up.

Kathleen Noone talked about that some too, the effort you make in auditions, as she said she had a tough time getting casting people to believe, post-AMC, that she could play bitchy or tough roles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Being a soap star is a great thing if you make it work. People like Bernard, Geary, Braden, Hall, Zimmer are superstars in the soap world, get paid well, and still get to live a somewhat normal, private life. People like Lucci and Sweeney are able to turn themselves into a celebrity and brand. As for trying to break out of soapstar into movie/tv star, well that seems to be harder. Soaps are full of returns after failed attempts and promising soap stars forgotten all together after taking a stab at moving on. I do belive actors from back in the day when they say they didnt get a role because of their soap past, for some reason it was looked down upon but that seems to be over. Molly Burnett for example has days listed on her resume and booked roles on True Blood and that disney show while on days and since leaving the show has booked gig after gig after gig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Composite heashot photos went from being the norm for character actors, to being cheesy, outdated, and discouraged, to being sort of in again. Frankly, CDs don't have time to be imaginative anymore. The days of being discovered in a peasant dress and made over into a star are long gone. CDs, particularly in L.A., want to see you looking like the role they're trying to cast, which brought back a trend over the last ten years or so for actors to take role specific headshots. If you look at the pics on Linda Dano's IMDb (like the one with the cigarette) or those photos of the young girl who was let go from GH that we were talking about the other week, you'll see what I mean. For years, you were encourage no to "dress the part" in an audition but that's changing more and more. Trends come and go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • No idea if this one had ever been up before or what the exact date is, but it's always good to look at/save the new AMC content while you can. If you're here for the drama there is some delirium with Adam and Erica about 10-12 minutes in.

      Please register in order to view this content

      @Vee @Jonathan @Maxim @All My Shadows @alwaysAMC @Contessa Donatella @Soaplovers @DemetriKane @dragonflies @AMCOLTLLover @Khan @Paul Raven @slick jones @Wendy @DeeVee @j swift @EricMontreal22 @AmandainNC28655 @Wilsoky @Franko @Liberty City @robbwolff @Soapsuds @soapfan770 @FrenchFan
    • I think there's a story to tell in someone who always believed in honesty and integrity being emmeshed in so many lies, but I agree that it wasn't very well laid out over the last few months. I think if I was more invested in Lois, I would have more of an issue than I do. Few can hold up against Jane. This is one of those cases where I think mentioning who already switched babies or have long-lost children would just take away from the fallout. If Lulu wants to drag Brook Lyn for hypocrisy there is probably still time (if the show bothers). I don't think anyone would claim these are the best GH episodes ever. It may be very lowered expectations at play. But I do think that scenes like yesterdays were some of Tracy's best, as she is a character who is often not allowed that type of moment.
    • You would think that, wouldn't you? I'd almost think they needed the money to get Robert Newman back, but they also had to know Larkin wasn't going to stick around and play second banana either. I don't get what the writers thought they were doing with Calla. Long liked using actors from Texas, but other than Alex/Bev McKinsey, the characters she wrote for them seemed blah.
    • Bo has a bad history with kids named Zach. (too soon?)
    • Christie said in her interview this week that she recently started taking acting classes again, and has been doing some work in England, so that helped her to jump into Carrie for this (as well as it being all so familiar, it really was home.)
    • Andrea Barber aka Kimmy Gibbler did have a few scenes with Drake too, when he first came on. Christie came in the middle of that storyline 
    • Carrie, as played by Andrea Barber, was at Bo & Hope's wedding. She was the flower girl. The ringbearer was Zachary Parker, the little boy that Megan tried to pass off as her and Bo's son. Andrea's Carrie was at Tony & Anna's real wedding (Aug. 5, 1985). She appeared for the last time on March 21, 1986. Christie's Carrie debuted on April 14, 1986. It appears that Carrie remained in Salem, just off-screen, during that near-month. Christie picked up with what Andrea had been playing, apprehension over John.
    • I don't think she is. I think she just created some really boring characters and for some reason doesn't know what to do with them.  But let's say that she is being force to write these characters that she doesn't like or want to write for.......that's a really bad sign that the creator of the show is being told what to do from the very beginning.  With so many EPs, I was worried there could be too many cooks in the kitchen, too many people giving notes - all those EPs are representing companies who have a stake in the show.    Canada continues to be one episode ahead. Thursday's US episode is another lacklustre episode, even with Leslie in it.  We'll see if Friday or Monday's episode in Canada will be a repeat. 
    • Like a lot of soaps, once relatives left, they kinda dropped off the face of the earth and out of conversations. I don't know why writers do that. If they just don't want to confuse viewers, or don't think it matters, or want the liberty kind of revise history to make their stories work. After Josh left in '84, he's barely mentioned. Even when Billy's railing against Kyle and refusing to accept him, it'd be the most natural thing in the world to say "Kyle's NOT by brother, JOSH is!" and I don't think he ever really says that.  The only writer I can recall who didn't do that is Doug Marland on ATWT. 
    • IIRC, there is a line during this time period where Reva says something like Marah is her first-born child, which fans were not thrilled with.  Dylan makes a few appearances through the rest of the show (and a much later recast that isn't really worth talking about, with a face that is familiar to you). He will make one briefly during 1997, if you get that far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy