Jump to content

Trayvon Martin Killing


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Your bottom line, IS correct, but Zimmerman getting out of his car was precipitated by Trayvon jumping a fence in the "uniform" that is worn by gang members, a woman in tight clothing is compeltely different in that it does not bring suspicion of criminal activity by the general public. Zimmerman's intent was to STOP criminal activity, not perpetrate it, like with your rape analogy, he was just unhinged and overzealous, but that doesn't change the orginal intent.... unless you think he left his hosue that night saying to himelf "I'm gonna go kill me black bioy tonight". But like I stated, I put the biggest part of the blame on the HOA for not hiring trained security guards to do that job, hence Zimmerman should not have even been out there doing that in the first place. The clothing aspect is what I consider a "contributing factor" which is different from a "Primary reason".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

George Zimmerman got out of his car because he was overzealous.

When you see someone you think is committing a crime away from you personally, you call the police not get out of a safe place to confront him. It's not as if George Zimmerman saw him attacking another person and got out of his car to come to anyone's aid.

It's not really a free society if people need to dress in such a way as to not make others suspicious that they are not criminals. It's impossible for anyone who is categorized as predisposed to criminal activity based on race/ethnicity to dress in a way as not to be seen as a criminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree that him getting out of his car was overzealous. Absolutely. Just so many factors at play, as was mentioned, also.. the 911 operator not being direct and firm as well. In a perfect world, we could dress any way we wanted and not be judged for it, but we have to deal in reality, not in what "Should be".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Martin didn't jump a fence, that's not stated in any facts that I've seen. Zimmerman's account never stated that Martin jumped a fence, when he did a re-enactment on video, that never was stated, was not mentioned on the 911 call and isn't in the police report.

The rules of neighborhood watch are to call the police and not attempt to handle any situation yourself, mainly for your own safety.

If you judge people by what they are wearing, that's a recipe for trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought I missed the whole jumping the fence thing because I hadn't heard about it before. Seeing someone jump over a fence is cause for suspicion and should lead you to call the police not get out of your car and pursue him.

He was wrong to follow him no matter what happened because he didn't get out of his car to help anyone.

I don't buy that. I think people should dress so that they are decent in public. I know "decent" is subjective but the whole idea that you have to dress in a way that makes someone not see you as a criminal is ridiculous. I'm not responsible for what someone else thinks about my clothes.....I can only be responsible for what I think. Other people's thoughts or hangups aren't my business. That whole notion is discriminatory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is the lie that is manufactured to rally around Zimmerman.

The hoodie thing is so stupid there are no words. There are no excuses for Zimmerman's behavior and Trayvon did nothing wrong or deserving of being killed by that asswipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And how do you know his jeans were sagging? I have only ever heard about the hoodie, just because he is a young African American male doesn't mean he was sagging. I see plenty of young minority males who do not sag. And where did the jumping the fence thing come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, some of the discussions that came as a result of this--especially about hoodies just border on ridiculous, imo.

Example #1: This is the biggest fear that a black mother has. (I'm still unsure whether it's that her son gets killed by the police--even though George Zimmerman was a neighborhood watchman or that her son is killed by a white man--even though he has a higher chance of being killed by someone of the same race)

And if it's because he's wearing a hoodie then guess what--there's a solution for that--don't let him wear hoodies.

Example #2: The mini do I look like a threat in this hoodie? movement. Some of the people I saw made me say "yes," not because of their clothing but their menacing looks.

Example #3: Racial profiling and the congressman in the hoodie taking the floor and declaring that it must end. Pass a law then since it's that simple. Otherwise stop being silly and recognize that it's a way of thinking and be honest about all the ways you contribute to that way of thinking because you cannot legislate people's thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

The reason why you haven't heard about the jeans is because news outlets were afraid to report it, because they knew they'd be call racist if they did. Rap and hip hop cultrue is a cancer that is eating away at the black community, much in the same way meth is in small town white america. My main point is this tragedy needs to be a wake up call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CNN may have a point about the potential attacks but they should have done a better job reporting this in the first place. Once they presented this as a racially motivated killing, there is no walking back from that. Other than the assumptions of people who were no where around and an edited 9-1-1 tape, where is the evidence that George Zimmerman racially profiled Trayvon Martin? It seems to be all based on the beliefs of individuals about what sort of impression his clothing made on George Zimmerman. The girl on the phone doesn't seem to have claimed to hear any threats or anything racist being said by George Zimmerman (not that he needed to say anything racist to be a racist).

Everyone is down to making up their own version of events including how he hunted the kid down like an animal.

I wish George Zimmerman would just be honest.

I wish I could blame rap and meth but it's a lot deeper than that including a strong sense of hopelessness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This tragedy is a wake call to get rid of the "stand the ground" law and tighten gun control laws, not to let white people justify stereotyping young black men because of their skin color and how they dress.

Oh, and that comment about rap and hip hop is racist bullshit generalization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why would it be a racist generaliztion, because I CERTAINLY put Kid Rock and Eminem in that category as well, Eminem is one of the wrost offenders of them all. Videos that glorify violence and misogyny. I do totally agree about the stand your ground laws being ridiculous.... the law should only apply if you are in your CAR or your own HOME. It might not have started out that way, but the CULTURE surrounding rap and hip hop has become the work of the devil. But if you all want to champion rap and hip hop while you bitch about misogyny in daytime serials, y'all go right ahead. And for your information, Dionne Warwick and Cissy Houston hold this exact same opinion. As a matter of fact, protests were launched back in the 90's by the National congress of Black women, co-chaired by Delores Tucker, Dionne, and Melba Moore (an organization that Michelle Obama fully supports) . People are just GOING to stereotype people of any race because of how they dress. They are going to stereotype because of what Trayvon was wearing in the exact same way this would be:

punk_rocker_with_a_cockatiel_10059070.jpg

But watch this starting at 1:25. and you will see exactly how I feel about this, from a woman I have a great deal of respect for:

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really disagree with much of the characterization of rap or certain rappers. But to be fair, it's not all bad and here and globally there are still socially conscientious rappers in existence so let's narrow it down to the specifically destructive elements of rap. Once upon a time it was friendly and happy go lucky and then it the "gangsta rap" element was introduced and ironically it got the user friendly label of hip hop which I don't use because rap by any other name is still rap.

Honestly I'm guilty of repeating lyrics from the Underground, Biggie, and a host of other--not the vile parts but I love music and they do sample some great songs. I don't care for Jay-Z but I do love the way his production team used that theme from "Shaft in Africa" on one of his songs, I love the sound of the "Encore/Numb" Linkin Park hybrid, and I do not care for Kanye West but Dwele has an awesome hook on "Flashing Lights." But I'm no impressionable youth.

Tipper Gore's push for the PA labels was helpful, even though the labels are sometimes missing on cds that should be labeled such as Janet Jackson's "Velvet Rope."

I am not even sure that I believe that rap is the problem since it cannot be any more hypnotic than all that rock music that was supposed to cause kids to fall prey to sex and drugs.

I think the biggest problem is teaching kids that they will never amount to anything because of who they are. If you're taught at a young age that you're less than and will never be any more than that then why would you even try? And it's not just about society saying these things, it's about all those well intentioned people who see themselves as trying to spare children disappointment by teaching them that the man hates them--that can't end well. And that's probably just the tip of the iceberg for a kid living in the worst part of the city, surrounded by gang violence, in a broken home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing.  Because my teenage self stayed home often on Saturday nights in the early 90’s I watched Empty Nest just about every night to the bitter end, I do actually always felt a bit sad whenever I see that GG ep knowing that Rita’s character will die with that last line “Good night!” For years I admit I had the Mandela effect that Mulligan was in the episode before I finally caught it again on Lifetime.    And yes lol I don’t care for David Leisure’s character in the episode but somehow was funnier than anything on Empty Nest. Same when Charley crossed over for Dorothy’s Jeopardy dream. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
    • 35 years ago tonight was the series finale. Promo at 11:43

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I liked them, too, and was really disappointed it never went anywhere. The whole art theft story was ridiculous, but they had a nice chemistry. Certainly nicer than Alan with Christine. With her, he looked like the funny uncle. The worst thing they did to Bolger, IMO, was having Phillip write that DREADFUL novel and dramatizing it while he wrote it. GAG, that has to be in the running for one of their worst storylines that didn't involve wacky things like clones or time travel. Soaps rarely do school storylines, or don't do them for very long. Not the case so much in the early days of soaps, but after GH took off in the late 70s other soaps took their lead and would catapult teens/young adults into adult stories right away. That's one reason Phillip and Mindy ended up with so many ex-spouses--they started getting married really young. They shipped Dina and Cameron off really fast after high school and stuck Alan Michael in a marriage storyline with Harley. Did he EVER go to college? I don't think so. It may also partly explain why Quint and Annabelle had to go, beyond TPTB wanting to do a cast sweep. Teaching is not a profession that plays well on a soap. Quint definitely had to quit being Indiana Jones, because that wore thin really fast, but they didn't do him favors by making him a professor. If they wanted to keep him, they should have done what they did with Amanda (who was in another dead-end soap job, concert pianist)--have him work at Spaulding as one of the major stockholders.
    • Judith McConnell (Augusta) and Denise Alexander (Lesley) were great screen partners on GH.  They got into some stellar arguments in character in the medicine room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy